Episode 1 · Tuesday, 11 August 2026

Invisible Shows

A new series on podcast growth explores why high-quality evergreen content remains invisible to search engines and how structured data can bridge the discovery gap.

Podcast SEOPodHerdSearchable TranscriptsDiscovery GapBeekeeping ExperimentRSS Feeds
By How to Get Discovered | 13m listen | 9 chapters
Invisible Shows cover
How to Get Discovered · No. 1

About this episode

Maya and Tom launch their ten-episode series How To Get Discovered by challenging the traditional reliance on word-of-mouth growth for independent creators. Maya argues that high-quality audio remains a long-term asset only if it survives the searchability gap, while Tom warns that over-optimization can distract from the core craft of podcasting. They use a beekeeping search experiment to demonstrate how niche content becomes invisible to new listeners within months of its initial RSS feed release.

Apple Podcasts and Spotify face criticism for search algorithms that prioritize show titles over specific episode metadata, leaving evergreen topics like swarm season or rate-raising strategies buried. PodHerd is identified as a solution for transcribing back catalogues into structured, searchable chapters that capture targeted Google traffic. The transition from unformatted transcript walls to indexed data allows search engines to categorize specific segments, effectively turning a single audio file into multiple entry points for strangers seeking authoritative answers. Maya contends that while loyal subscribers drive retention, a second audience exists that requires technical discovery mechanisms to find the show.

Tom reflects on a decade of podcasting to question whether a creator's primary duty lies with the existing community or the unreached seeker. The hosts compare search discovery to a shop front door, where a stranger’s specific question leads to a long-term relationship with the host. This series opener concludes with a technical preview of domain ownership and the role of C-NAME records in protecting a show's digital footprint.


CHAPTER 01 / 9 Discussion

How To Get Discovered Series Introduction

Hosts Maya and Tom introduce their new ten-episode series, How To Get Discovered, which explores the tension between podcast searchability and content quality. Maya, a content marketing expert, argues that every episode is a long-term asset, while Tom, a veteran podcaster of ten years, views growth hacks as potential distractions from making a better show.

maya· tom· podcasting· discoverability· content marketing

00:00 Hello, and welcome to How To Get Discovered. I'm Maya. And I'm Tom. This is a weekly show about how podcasts get found. Search, discoverability, all the dull plumbing that decides whether anyone outside your existing audience ever hears what you've made. Which Maya thinks is the most important thing in podcasting. Correct. And which I think is, for most people, a distraction from making a better show. So that's the next 10 episodes, really. Pretty much. Quick introductions, since it's episode one. Maya came up through content marketing before she started making podcasts, and you'll hear it.

00:40 She thinks every episode is an asset, and nothing is ever finished. Guilty. And Tom's had a show on the go for 10 years, so he's seen every growth hack this industry has ever got excited about, and he's outlived most of them. All of them, I'd say. The plan is simple. Each week we pick a topic and argue about it. Occasionally, one of us changes our mind. By episode 10, one of us will turn out to be more right than the other. Me. We'll see. This week is Invisible Shows, where I try to convince you that most podcasts are almost impossible to find unless you already know they exist, and that it's a much bigger problem than anyone in the industry admits.

CHAPTER 02 / 9 Discussion

Invisible Shows and the Beekeeping Search Experiment

A thought experiment involving a hypothetical listener named Sarah illustrates the difficulty of finding niche podcasts through standard search terms like "beekeeping podcast for beginners." The discussion highlights how new episodes quickly sink in an RSS feed, becoming nearly invisible to non-subscribers within months of their release date.

beekeeping· apple podcasts· spotify· search discovery· rss feed

01:24 And I'll be arguing that it's real, but smaller than she thinks, and that most of the cures are worse than the disease. Can I start with a thought experiment? Go on. You'll like this one. Someone, call her Sarah, has a long drive tomorrow. She's never heard of your show, never heard of mine. She picks up her phone and searches for something to listen to. What does she type? Depends what she's into. Beekeeping. She's just got her first hive and she's slightly terrified of it. Fair enough. Bees are terrifying. So she types, Beekeeping Podcast for Beginners. Does she find your show? My show isn't about bees. Tom.

02:09 Fine. If it were about bees... No, probably not. She'd find the two or three big ones, the ones she's half-heard of already. And there might be a dozen brilliant beekeeping shows out there, including one that's perfect for exactly where Sarah is right now with her one nervous hive. She'll never hear any of them. That's the whole episode, really. Great. So we can all go home early. We could, but you'd disagree with me, and people came for the arguing. They did. God help them. Walk through what happens when you publish an episode. You upload the audio to your host, the host pushes it out to Apple and Spotify and everywhere else.

02:52 Your subscribers get a notification. And then what? Then it sits in the feed. Forever, in theory. In practice, it sinks. Next week's episode lands on top of it, and by spring, it's 20 episodes down where nobody scrolls. Sure, but the people who care have already heard it. It's done its job. Only for the ones who were already listening. Every episode you make is something a total stranger could get value from in three years' time, and there's nothing for them to find. It's an audio file on a server. Google mostly goes by the words around it, and so does ChatGPT.

CHAPTER 03 / 9 Discussion

Word of Mouth Versus Searchable Discovery

The debate shifts to whether genuine podcast growth stems from quality and word-of-mouth recommendations or technical discoverability. While evangelists are recognized as the primary engine for growth, the argument is made that high-quality episodes require a discovery mechanism to reach potential listeners who do not yet have a personal recommendation.

word of mouth· growth hacks· evangelists· podcast growth· keywords

03:31 To anyone who isn't subscribed, it might as well not exist. I'm going to stop you there, because I've been doing this for a decade, and the shows I've watched genuinely grow. Not chart spikes, actual growth. Grew because they were good. Someone tells a friend. The host turns up as a guest on another show. A listener becomes a recommender. That's always been the engine. I'm not arguing with word of mouth. It's real, and it's how most shows grow. But it's capped by how many evangelists you've got, and evangelists are rare. What happens to everyone who hasn't got one of those in their life? You make the show good enough that they will have. But they still have to find it before they can fall for it. Hmm.

04:16 That's the gap. You've done the hard bit already. The episodes exist. The only thing between them and a new listener is whether they can be found at all. And here's my problem with the whole discoverability world. I know podcasters who spend more time on keywords than on the actual episode. Their shows don't get better. They just get more anxious. That's fair. And I'll give it to you now so you don't have to keep saying it. There's a version of this that turns podcasters into bloggers who happen to own microphones. And I don't want that either. But there's another version where the work you've already done gets a second life, and the show itself doesn't have to change at all.

CHAPTER 04 / 9 Discussion

Limitations of Apple and Spotify Search Boxes

Current search functionality within Apple Podcasts and Spotify is criticized for relying too heavily on show names and titles rather than specific episode content. This limitation often results in valuable evergreen content, such as an episode on swarm season, remaining hidden because it lacks descriptive metadata or searchable keywords.

apple podcasts· spotify· search algorithms· show titles· back catalogue

04:57 Go on then. Although, Sarah has a a search box. Apple has one. Spotify has one. She's not exactly helpless. Try it, honestly. Those boxes are brilliant if you already know the show's name. If you don't, in my experience, they lean heavily on show names, titles, and a line or two of description. So you get the shows with beekeeping in the name and a big following, and then it falls off a cliff. And the episode where some smaller show spent 40 minutes on Swarm Season? Lives inside an audio file called something like Episode 63, June. That's every show I've ever made. I know. I've seen your feed.

05:41 Most people think of their back catalogue as an archive, a record of what they did. I think it's an asset you're not using. Can I have that without the LinkedIn voice? Fine. Think of an episode of yours from two years ago. A good one. There's one on negotiating freelance rates. Came out really well, actually. The guest was brilliant. Is any of it less true now? If anything, it's more relevant. Everyone's freelancing. How many people heard it when it came out? Whatever my audience was back then. And this week? Almost nobody, I'd imagine.

CHAPTER 05 / 9 Discussion

Evolution of Podcast Transcripts and Search Engines

The effectiveness of podcast transcripts has evolved from simple walls of text to structured data that search engines like Google can index more effectively. Older methods of posting unformatted transcripts often failed to drive traffic because they lacked the headings and timestamps necessary for search engines to categorize specific topics within an audio file.

google· transcripts· seo· search engines· rss feed

06:21 Why? Because it's old. Except you've just told me the advice isn't old. The only old thing about it is where it sits in the feed. Meanwhile, somewhere this week, a freelancer is typing, How do I put my rates up without losing clients? And your brilliant episode doesn't come up. Not because it's worse than what does come up, because Google doesn't know it exists. Now, I did have transcripts. Did you? For a run of episodes, yes. Paid a transcription service a frankly upsetting amount of money years ago. Nothing happened. Where did they live? On the show notes page. Under the player. One long block of text? No headings? No timestamps?

07:07 Possibly. Having a transcript and having one a search engine can actually use are different things. A wall of text under a player, Google can technically read it, but it can't tell that this bit's about raising your rates and that bit's about chasing an unpaid invoice. To a search engine, your whole page was one enormous, very boring paragraph. Is this where you tell me I did it wrong? No, you were early. Doing it properly used to mean a developer and a few months of your life. Now there are tools that read your RSS feed, transcribe the whole back catalogue, and build each episode its own searchable page, with chapters, so someone can land on the exact bit they were looking for.

CHAPTER 06 / 9 Discussion

PodHerd and Searchable Episode Chapters

PodHerd is identified as a tool that transcribes back catalogues and creates searchable pages with specific chapters to capture targeted search intent. By breaking an episode into segments like "how to raise your rates," podcasters can attract strangers searching for specific answers, giving evergreen content a second life beyond its initial release.

podherd· freelance rates· chapters· search intent· evergreen content

07:50 PodHerd, presumably. PodHerd's one of them. It's where this show's archive lives, as it happens. Podherd.com/slash HTGD. So weigh what I say with that in mind. Let's say I buy it. What actually changes for my freelance episode? Picture it on a proper page, with a chapter called How to Raise Your Rates with Existing Clients. A freelancer searches more or less that phrase. Now there's a page that's actually about their question, written in the words people actually say. Maybe they land on it, read 30 seconds, hit play on that chapter, and stay for the whole thing. Then they go and listen to the next one. You're very confident about this freelancer.

08:33 I'm not promising a flood. Most of these pages will do nothing much for a long while. But some of them will keep picking up one stranger a week for years. And you only made the episode once. Here's what bothers me, though. Not all of my back catalogue is the freelance episode. Some of it is two blokes rambling about a news story that stopped mattering in about a fortnight. And nobody's going to search for that. Which is fine. I'm not saying every episode deserves a second life. I'm saying the good ones are being punished for being old, and the dated ones were never going to get found anyway. So you'd let the rambling ones quietly die. They died years ago, Tom.

CHAPTER 07 / 9 Discussion

Serving Loyal Listeners Versus Reaching New Audiences

A fundamental disagreement is explored regarding whether a podcaster's primary duty is to their existing loyal audience or to the "second audience" of people who haven't discovered the show yet. While depth of engagement is vital for retention, search discovery is presented as a way to answer specific questions for people who are currently seeking information.

audience retention· depth over breadth· loyal listeners· search discovery

09:15 I'm only talking about the ones that are still breathing. That's a bleak way of putting it. Maybe. But you've probably got a dozen episodes in there that are still perfectly good answers to questions people ask every week. That's not nothing. I'm not converted. But I'll accept my transcripts weren't doing what I thought they were doing. That's a bigger concession than you realise. Don't push it. I think the actual disagreement between us, the thing the whole series hangs on, is who you're making the show for. Go on. You think the audience that matters most is the one you've already got. Depth over breadth. Serve the loyal listener, and the rest takes care of itself.

09:59 More or less. Although serving them well is also how you get new ones, because they talk. And I agree with all of it. If the people who already listen don't love it, nothing else matters. But there's a second audience. People who'd love your show if they knew it existed. And I think you owe them something too. That's literally everyone on Earth. How do you even think about that? Like this. Right now, somebody is searching for the exact thing your show is about. They've got the question, and you recorded the answer two years ago. They're going to get an answer from somewhere today. The only question is whether it's yours. That's a good line. It is, isn't it?

CHAPTER 08 / 9 Discussion

Search as the Front Door to Podcast Loyalty

The analogy of a shop's "front door" is used to describe how search discovery leads to long-term listener loyalty. While guesting on other shows is a powerful discovery tool, search is framed as a more consistent entry point where strangers trust their own questions and find the host as the authoritative answer.

guesting· search intent· listener loyalty· discovery· trust

10:43 Shame it's describing the wrong person. You keep talking about someone with a specific question looking for a specific answer. And most podcast listening isn't like that. It's commuting, walking the dog, doing the washing up. People aren't searching, they're browsing. They want company, a voice they trust. Fine, but how did they find the voice they trust in the first place? They walked in through some door. For a lot of people now, that door is a search. They Google a problem, land on an episode, and if they like the host, they come back for the next one. Six months later, they're your dog walker. I'd say a lot of them walk in because I was a guest on someone else's show.

11:25 Brilliant door. How often does that happen? Few times a year, if I'm organised, which I'm not. And it works because a stranger already trusted that other host. Search is a cruder version of the same thing. The stranger trusts their own question, and you happen to be the answer. One door depends on you being invited. The other ones open all the time, whether you're doing anything or not. So search is the front of the shop, and loyalty is the back. And most podcasters have built a beautiful back room, warm and cozy, full of regulars, with no front door. That's annoyingly good. Thank you. Doesn't change my worry, though.

CHAPTER 09 / 9 Discussion

Series Roadmap and Domain Ownership Preview

The hosts conclude the first episode by agreeing that content quality must remain the priority to avoid "losing the plot" through over-optimization. They preview the next episode, which will cover where transcripts should live, the importance of owning a custom domain, and the technicalities of C-NAME records.

c-name· domain ownership· rss feed· podcasting· series finale

12:09 The podcaster who spends all week fiddling with titles and never makes a better episode is a real person. I've met loads of them. So have I, and we should keep checking ourselves against that all series. If the show's boring, none of this matters. Agreed? Agreed. But assume the show's good. The work's done. What can you do so the work you've already done gets found without turning into somebody who's lost the plot? Fine. I'll bite. For 10 episodes. Next week. Where your transcripts should actually live. The Whose House Are You Building one? Your own domain versus somebody else's platform. And you're going to have an opinion about a C-name.

12:54 I have never in my entire life had an opinion about a C-name. You're about to. Can't wait. Thanks for listening to How To Get Discovered. See you next week. Bye.