Topic: Globalism

Carl Oglesby's framework of "Yankee vs. Cowboy" defines the internal conflict within the American power structure. Yankees represent the Eastern establishment, multinational corporations, and globalist interests personified by David Rockefeller. They view the world as a North Atlantic industrial community and maintain a "special relationship" with Britain, often aligning with the Democratic Party's internationalist goals.

Narcissistic abuse recovery therapist Majit Karu Ropia explains how narcissists move "goalposts" to ensure their victims never succeed. The hosts apply this concept to the climate change debate, noting how the terminology shifted from "global warming" to "climate change" to "extreme weather." They argue that this fallacy is used by both sides of the political aisle to manipulate public perception and maintain control.

The discussion refutes the idea of a hot war with China, framing the U.S.-China relationship as a partnership established during the Clinton era. They argue that China buys U.S. debt so the U.S. can buy Chinese goods, creating a pass-through economy. The real "war" is described as being directed against the individual rather than between nations.

Mo Facts identifies as an ADOS (American Descendant of Slavery) and compares the 13% Black population in America to the 13% white population globally. He argues that both groups are facing "replacement" by the global elite. The discussion suggests that racial tension is manufactured to prevent different groups from recognizing their shared status as targets of the "supremacy" system.

Mo Facts posits that the global system maintains hierarchies by keeping even powerful groups in a state of dependency. He compares Israel's need to request defense funds for the Iron Dome every four years to the way Black institutions like HBCUs are forced to beg for funding. This cycle of dependency is described as a core mechanism of the "anti-justice system."

Alexander Ionov, president of the Moscow-based Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia, was indicted for conspiring to use U.S. citizens as illegal agents of the Russian government. The FBI alleges Ionov spread propaganda regarding the invasion of Ukraine and worked to undermine trust in American democratic processes. The discussion questions the specific goals of Ionov's interactions with local U.S. political groups via Zoom.

Neely Fuller Jr. describes white supremacy as the most powerful religion in history, surpassing Islam and Christianity. He clarifies that it is not about "skinheads" but about a global power structure that manages non-white people. The hosts conclude that the only way to beat the system is to stop being "humble" and "ineffective," and to recognize the "water" of indoctrination that everyone is swimming in.

Neely Fuller Jr. provides a "test" for religious leaders: observe their actions when the system of white supremacy demands they do something contrary to their faith. This is applied to the recent vaccine mandates, where many leaders complied despite their followers' concerns. Fuller defines white supremacy as a global system of control that overrides individual beliefs and dictates reality "because I said so."

Adam Curry and Mo Facts introduce episode 78, focusing on billionaire George Soros and his influence on global structures. They discuss the concept of an "Open Society" and how Soros, along with like-minded individuals, aims to restructure societal norms. The conversation sets the stage for examining Soros not as a singular "boogeyman," but as a representative of a specific institutional ideology.

The hosts compare the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" to modern political propaganda like the Steele Dossier, noting that even forged documents can have real-world effects. They argue that George Soros uses the history of anti-Semitism as a "magic cape" to shield himself from legitimate criticism of his globalist financial activities. The discussion touches on how modern media creates faceless enemies out of groups like Russians or Jews to drive political narratives.

The discussion explores how Henry Ford used professional journalists to "punch up" the "Protocols" to make them more appealing to the American public. The hosts argue that George Soros uses the historical context of Ford’s anti-Semitism as a shield to deflect from his own political and financial influence. They conclude that labeling all criticism of globalism as anti-Semitism prevents honest discourse about institutional power.

Emily Tamkin’s book "The Influence of Soros" is discussed, highlighting Soros's history as a hedge fund pioneer who "broke the Bank of England" in 1992. The segment covers his transition from currency trader to a philanthropist spending billions to foster an "Open Society." The hosts argue that his goal is to bring nations to their knees financially to facilitate a globalist, borderless system.

The hosts discuss how the Duke case demonstrated a "shared goal" between liberal faculty, ambitious prosecutors, and the New York Times. This coordination is described not as a formal conspiracy, but as a mutually beneficial alignment of interests to push a specific ideological vision. The segment notes that the "woke" graduates of 2006 are now the mid-career professionals running modern media and corporate institutions.

The hosts facetiously propose a "vaccine draft" where everyone, including billionaires and politicians, must line up for a jab to ensure the load is carried equally. They critique the "global citizen" narrative pushed by Bill Gates and the WHO. They suggest that if the threat were truly sincere, there would be no exceptions for the elite or their children.

Mo defines premeditation in the context of the nine-minute restraint, arguing that Chauvin had ample time to change his course of action. He describes the global reaction—including riots in Holland—as evidence of a "major spell" cast on the world. He asserts that the event was never truly about George Floyd but about a broader push for a specific type of "justice" that remains undefined.

Citing Neely Fuller, the hosts define white supremacy as a cold, global system of power that functions as a world government regardless of the race of individual participants. They argue that Black communities are often used as a "beta test" for restrictive social policies, such as biased algorithms or medical mandates, before they are rolled out to the general population. The segment concludes with a discussion on the importance of maintaining distinct cultural identities.

A proposed solution to the immigration crisis involves allowing undocumented residents to stay without citizenship while granting their children a path to legal status. Some argue that globalist interests prefer an influx of "proactive" immigrants to replace "lazy" Americans who are being transitioned toward Universal Basic Income (UBI). This shift is occurring alongside a student debt crisis that leaves young American workers financially crippled compared to new arrivals without such burdens.

Using a clip from Neely Fuller, the hosts discuss the concept of a worldwide system of white supremacy as a synonym for globalism or a one-world government. They argue that the elite pick winners and losers based on arbitrary classifications, such as the recent shift in how Asian Americans are categorized. The segment posits that the system plays different racial and political groups against each other to maintain control.

Cynthia McKinney's theory on the "divide in the deep state" is discussed, where she posits a conflict between globalists and "nationalist" factions (the "killer wasps") within the military. The hosts praise her analysis and call for her to be interviewed on the show. They emphasize her quote: "All the bad things that are happening to white people today happened to black people first."

Mo Facts plays a clip from Chronicles of Judah 144, which argues that the image of Martin Luther King Jr. is used by white liberals as a "trigger" to control Black Americans. The segment suggests MLK was a pawn used to bring Black people into the fold of globalism and communism. Mo speculates that Griffith J. Davis may have been an asset assigned to keep MLK within the parameters of American capitalism.