97: Flowers for Fuller

00:05 Mo Facts with Adam Curry for March 20th, 2024. This is episode number 97. Only three more episodes to go in this series of Mo Facts with Adam Curry. And I am Adam Curry coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country. Time once again to spin the wheel of topics from here to Northern Virginia. Ladies and gentlemen, please say hello to my friend on the other end, the one and only Mr. Mo Facts. How are you doing, Adam? Mo, I am good. It's good to hear your voice, brother. Same to hear your voice as well. Well, I hear it frequently, but directly, it's good to hear it. Yeah, and I mean, your rig has just, you know, it's taken four years, but finally, we got a rig.

00:46 You got a connection. And just as we're about to end the series, everything sounds great. Isn't that amazing? Well, hey, it's about to take it to another level. That's what that is. Hey, everything good with the fam and with Rocco? Everybody's doing good. Everybody's wonderful. Okay, excellent. How about the family your way? Everything's good, man. The kids are hanging in. Some of them still partially on the payroll. You know how that is? But we're sitting pretty here in the hill country. Funny you say that. My son's on my payroll now, and he doesn't miss a day at work. Oh, but he's on the real payroll. He's actually working for you. Oh, yeah. Yeah, see, I don't have that luxury anymore. It's like, what's the cell phone bill? Oh, okay.

01:30 Tell you what, brother, I'm going to spin the wheel of clips, if you don't mind. A wheel of topics, I should say. Round and round it goes. Let's see what we're going to talk about today. I'm Mo Facts with Adam Curry. Where that wheel stops, nobody knows. Mo Facts knows because he has selected this whole show for us. Let's see. Today's topic is... They control the way that people think, speak, and act. Oh, yes. That's kind of up my alley, I'd say. Yeah, that's Mr. Nilly Fuller. We're going to get into some to address this confusion that's running rampant right now. We've done it before, but I think we need to have a booster. A booster shot. Yeah. Yeah. We need to have a booster of addressing the confusion that's running wild

02:14 throughout our culture, throughout the social media, throughout the media, throughout politics, everything. It seems like we had a lull there and it's just spiked right back up. It might be due to the election that's less than a year away. It could be due to just the ramping up of just race. Yeah. I mean, we were almost going over four years. We started having this conversation and race was, you know, it was. Yeah, it was four years. No, no, wait. It's been almost five because we almost.

02:52 Yeah, we started as I was coming back from my honeymoon. So I had only been married for a month or so, and that's when we started. We didn't start recording the show, but that's when we started talking. Right. And that's the thing is that we, it was just percolating, and we've ran this whole cycle to the point that we're at peak racism right now or peak race focus. And I knew this was going to be the main, what's the word I'm looking for? Manipulator. Well, nice. It's more important now than ever, you know, now that it appears that 45 Future 47 seems to have black America on his hand, or at least a portion of it, black men, maybe.

03:41 And that seems to be a big threat. Yes, and then everything that's going on with it's a lot going on. So let's just go ahead. We're going to find out. We're going to talk about it. We're going to get together. I promise you we're going to talk about it. So also, this is me giving my flowers to Mr. Nilly Fuller Jr. while he can still smell them. I would like to say one thing that having his work and actually digging into it across these five years deeper than I ever had has prepared me for what's going on. So I want to give him his flowers while he can smell them. And we're going to start off with the first clip.

04:25 And this that they control our minds. Oh, they have all kinds of ways because they control the way that people think, speak, and act. If they are people of color. And we have to have a new way of thinking, speaking, and acting. That's why I called it the compensatory code, what I have written. That's the way out of this. We have to change the way that we see what we're looking at. Because we are told that we are looking at something that's different from what the way it really is. What we're really looking at is white supremacy all around us. Even when you don't see any white people at all, you're looking at a world that they have produced and a way of thinking that they have produced and a way of acting that they have produced.

05:13 And when people are in conflict with each other, they have produced that, even when they are nowhere around. They are the ones who directly and directly produce the circumstances that will bring on the conflict. You have to understand that they are masters of the activities of the non-white people, the people that they classify as non-white on this planet. This is probably one of the most misunderstood things, not just of Neely Fuller Jr., but also of this podcast, is the term white supremacy. I like that he used the compensatory code in there. I thought that was interesting.

05:56 But this is something that people get stuck on because they get stuck on the word white. White, yes, exactly. Not the system, not supremacy. White. I heard you describe it as the operating system. Yes, and we're going to get, we're going to, we have to go, we have to double back for exactly the reason you said because it's, it's like I said, it needs a booster. And it's confusing because the left has hijacked this term and used it as a weapon to hit the right over the head with it.

06:37 Now it's become partisan with the whole woke thing and that whole phenomenon that it doesn't mean what they say it means. We're talking about a system of control that's based off of skin color. That's what it is. Now, if you snap, Thano snap, and I tell people all the time, if you Thano snapped your fingers and got rid of white people, there will be a power vacuum and somebody else will slide into that power vacuum. The reason why I'm so focused on this is not because I'm, and I said this on the last show, not because I'm hung up on white supremacy.

07:15 I'm hung up on actually achieving justice. And justice is, by the definition in the book, the people that need the most help get the most constructive help, and no one is mistreated. Who can be against that? Nobody. It's that simple. And whatever it is is in the way of that, it is what it is. And that's where the term it starts with us came from. It starts with us. It's not going to end with us. And in this episode, I'm going to lay out how I think it's going to play out.

07:52 But before I do, if you want a better understanding of what, because I don't go into detail of when it started or how I think it started, because that's not the point. I'm trying to figure out what this operating system is running right now. But the Hidden Life is Best podcast is a great source. And he said I was his inspiration. But I've listened to his, I've been listening to his work, and he goes back into just where he thinks the beginning of this control system. I don't think he uses the term white supremacy, but that would be a good idea. If you want to know who or who might it be, I'm not concerned with that.

08:37 I'm concerned with, like you said, the operating system. Yes. So how it functions or how it spreads, we have to go back to episode 92. This is a throwback clip in the episode of White Lies. And this is learn to command the spells. And this is Laurel Erica. In all our efforts to heal our psyche and raise consciousness on the planet, we have all but overlooked the very instrument of conscious thought and communication.

09:17 Yet our forked tongue English language, which is the leading software of the Western mind, is itself in great need of retuning and upgrading. Over the course of my life, I cultivated a heightened sensitivity to how the total normality of insanity in society is echoed, reflected, and reinforced by the English language, which inadvertently yet unavoidably propagates an antiquated and manipulated vision of reality. of reality promulgated by the ancient church as an instrument of mind control at a time when people had to surrender their mind if they wanted to keep their heads about them, quite literally.

10:09 The forked tongue. Wow. It's the software. That's really good. It's the language. Of course. The way we speak to each other, the way we interp you can say one thing. And this is why text is terrible to communicate because without the component of context, context. The context. There's no context in text. And the way you inferred it. Because when we're speaking to each other, you can listen to the tone of my voice, the way I said it, how I said it. But when it's flat text, there's none of this there. So you can throw the sarcasm.

10:50 You throw an emoji. Right. You can miss the sarcasm. You can miss the timing, everything. And that I've seen relationships go left in language. And I see this all the time with people. They'll read a text to me and then I'll sit there and say, you just read that in the tone that you received it the way you think that person sent it. But that's on you. That's your receiver. That may not be. Let me read it to you in a different way. And I can read that same text in a positive tone. And people go, oh, yeah, I guess.

11:27 Yeah, that's kind of, yeah. Didn't think about that. And that's why this four-year journey has been so important because people have been able to sit on the sidelines and see people put their emotions to the side and had a have an honest conversation. I don't have, I'm a political atheist. I don't believe in any of it. You're no agenda. You don't understand. We both came into this conversation and saying, we want to seek first to understand, then to be understood. Amen. Which that's one of the seven habits of highly effective people.

12:05 All of this goes together. All of it goes together. And this is why we've been ineffective because people want to be understood first, want to be the first to talk. No, no, hear me out. Stop you. No, no, no, hear me out. That kind of thing. Where you should be quick to listen, slow to speak, even slower to get angry. Correct. And what would you get angry about? Because once again, Neely Fuller says, the only respect there is is self-respect. And the only way you can disrespect yourself is to lie to yourself. So even if you say something that I don't agree with,

12:44 if I accept it and I don't let you know I agree with it, then I lie to myself. But if I say, Adam, you know, I don't agree with that. I'm not going to try to change your mind. I'm not going to feel disrespected. But the fact that I aired it, and it goes vice versa. You can say, oh, no, no, if I agree with that, you're not disrespecting yourself. And nobody's walking away from the situation feeling disrespected. Exactly. The other thing, of course, is the meaning of words is being changed continuously. Real time. In the dictionaries, even. Well, I don't. I don't know if you saw this or not, but I want to go off on a tangent, but I have to say this in a quick minute.

13:27 Candace Owens sat down with this rabbi. I don't remember his name. And he explained what anti-Semitism was. And he actually says, it's a mutating definition. How can the definition of a word be ever-changing? Yeah. Oh, Shmooli. Shmuly Botich. No, that's not. She didn't sit down with Shmooli. They've been having their own war, but they actually, but that's how he explained it. And I was like, well, you're never getting anywhere with that because the person you're being accused of will never know what they're being accused of. Right. Yeah, because we don't have the same understanding of the term.

14:11 Right. And we've seen it with recession. We've seen it with women. We've seen it with. When it gets to something basic like men and women and the definition, and even our Supreme Court justices can't define it, you know, we're in trouble. We're in big trouble or we're right where, quote unquote, they want us to be. Want us to be. That's right. And that's on sand. You never can have a steady footing. Can't have a strong house built on sand. There it is. So I dug into what she said a little deeper. And this is from Memento. It's a YouTube channel, Memento Mori. And this is speech.

14:49 speak like magic. Conscious language is not just a contemporary idea, but a practice deeply embedded in history, resonating with beliefs held by ancient civilizations about the power of words. Ancient cultures, such as the Egyptians and Greeks, revered words for their creative and transformative abilities. They believed that words could bring intentions to life and influence thoughts, emotions, and outcomes. This reverence underscores the enduring recognition of words as potent tools that resonate with specific energies and have the power to shape our existence.

15:33 Today, we can draw upon these time-honored insights, integrating them with modern approaches like neuro-linguistics programming, NLP, which employs language to rewire the mind and shift perspectives. However, wielding this power responsibly demands ethical mindfulness. We must be considerate of how our words impact others, aiming to uplift rather than harm, and always respecting individual autonomy and consent. Yeah. Mind wars come through words all the time. Information war. I'm always jealous of AJ. I always liked Infowars.com.

16:16 I always wanted that one. Information is put through what? Images and words. Which they say an image is what? Worth a thousand words. We're back to words again. Words matter. Change your words. Change your world. There's another one that's a positive bent on it. And I think a lot of people have been given this information like an NLP layman's, and they're going around manipulating other individuals. That's why we're seeing cults on the rise again. It's just, we're in a crazy time. And I wanted to make this show,

16:58 I say it again, as a booster shot to say, hey, don't get sucked into the vacuum of confusion. Don't give, you know, have this. Even the Bible, it said, don't have a spirit of offense. Right? Yep. So what does that mean? Don't be offended. The only thing that can offend you, only thing can disrespect you is yourself. Yourself. That's right. I gave up the right to be offended. That happened to me about a year ago. It's like, oh, I don't need to be offended by all this stuff. And when you do, you actually become liberated, which that's what I want for people because that is a sign of justice because that's getting the people that need the most help, the most constructive help.

17:47 I hope people see where I'm going with this. And that's why I say this is an obligation. I can't stop doing whatever I'm doing. I don't know what it is. I don't even know from I never went into a show like, oh, I have a narrative I want to spin and let me go find the supporting information. I go into it with a scientific approach. Where does it lead me? Where does this investigation or this curiosity lead me? Which is exactly why it takes six weeks between each show. Yeah. And the thing is, it's true.

18:29 It's true. And once I get the information, then I have to parse it because I'm like, hey, is this person speaking have a motive? Right. You know, because I don't want to secondhand manipulate somebody by using manipulative information. Or if I use information that may be manipulative, let me get something to counter that where they can get both sides of the argument. Right. So, yeah, that is part of it. And then I'm a human being myself. So I had to process it all myself

19:09 to see how I feel about it before I come here and speak on it. I was just watching a video about bias, and there's overwhelming scientific proof. Scientific right word. Well, evidence. Maybe that's better. Scientific evidence that the more intelligent you are, the more you are prone to bias. I know exactly where you saw it because I saw the same video. Is that the after school? Is that the video? Exactly. Yeah. I'll put it in the screen. It almost made the clip. clips. But I mean, because I, you know, but I always be always respectful of the time aspect of it, but you're right.

19:53 Yeah. And with the bias, it's a whole thing that you believe because you want to believe going into it. So, but yeah, that would be, please add that in the show notes. Yes. I knew exactly what you said that. I said, we saw that. Our algorithms are starting to sink up a little bit. Yeah, it is. I probably got it off of your timeline somehow. Who knows? Who knows what happened? No, I didn't post it. It's interesting. Yeah, our timeline's emerging, which that's an interesting phenomenon in itself. But where we stop at, we've stopped at four. Yeah, all right. Now, this is this is this is Neely Fuller.

20:31 I just want to set it up a little bit. And this is this, I have to give a trigger warning because people might be triggered by what is what is said. But this is Neely Fuller being honest with himself and honest with other people. This is Neely Fuller, white folks preaching morality. One, like one white man said, and this in the book, there, a statement that says, God made white people to serve God and made black people to serve white people. And that's the way it is, and that's the way it should be. And if everybody just leave it alone, it'll work out fine.

21:12 Now, on the surface, that sounds reasonable. It sounds logical. You go by looking around you. But then you say, now, well, then why do they lie so much and prevent you from doing stuff? See, because if you have trained a dog, the dog is a dog. Okay? The dog cannot do what a dog is not designed to do. You know, people try to make a dog act like it's a person, but a dog is not a person. So it doesn't make any difference how that dog tries to do what people do. You know, has the mind that a person has. The dog is still a dog. The dog can't do it.

21:54 The white supremacists tell us that we can't do stuff. But then when we start showing some signs of doing it, they jump in your way. That's what gives them away. Yes. If this was my assigned role by the creator, it would be no need to manipulate. Just like with you and Phoebe and me in Morocco. That's right. There's no struggle. There's no power struggle between the owner and the dog. The dog falls into this position and the owner falls into this position. But the fact they have to constantly manipulate, and when I say they, I'm talking about the white supremacist, not all white people, because there's three groups of people.

22:42 I have to clarify this many, many times. There's white supremacists, there's white people, and there's non-white people in the system of white supremacy. Right. It's a choice to be a white supremacist. And I also say if you choose not to, you're their biggest problem if you're a white person because you have the means. Yeah, that's even more dangerous to be white and not choose to be in the system is actually careless. I'll give you an example from I don't make, and I always say we don't want to have a captive audience when we talk about biblical topics.

23:24 But for instance, Moses, once Moses realized what was going on, he was the biggest problem. Yeah. Because he said, I didn't want, I don't want to take part in this. I know I was raised here, but I don't want to take part in this system that you got going on here. And he became the biggest headache for Pharaoh. And that's how it is for white people that don't want to take part in the system because it's like, it's kind of like when you want to quit a gang. It's like, oh, you want to quit our gang, huh? You know, you know, you could be a real problem. You've been living in this neighborhood, seeing what's going on. Yeah. You know, you could go to the police and

24:05 speak. You know too much. You know too much. So I just want to make that point. Anything you want to say before we go into systems? No, no, that's good. You said it. Number six. Because, see, I took them seriously. You know, I thought about that statement when I first read it. I said, you know what? That could be true. And that wouldn't make a whole lot of fuss about nothing. What we need to do is just shut up and do what these white folks tell us to do. I said, that could be true. But then I started thinking, that couldn't be true. Because if that was true, true, regardless of what they did, to try to get us to do anything that we were designed not to do, we couldn't do it.

24:50 Okay. So they lied. All right. And not only that, another bigger thing that gives them away, if they're doing God's will, they mistreat people. They mistreat their own people. So, hey, that don't add up. Right. So if I understand what he's saying there, he's saying that racism isn't really just about skin color. It's just about a position of power. Based off of skin color. And we're going to get, the reason why I'm saying based off of skin color is we have to go back to what the skin color factor is.

25:38 Quote-unquote white people. Actually, let's start here. Race is a construct. Right. To even go off of color is stupid in itself because you have people that in my family that may be lighter than the darkest person in your family. Right. If you start looking at it, but it's like, no, you've been designated as this and you've been designated as that. So to go off of that is dumb, but that's what it's based off of. And color. Because, yes, the reason why it's based off of that is because white people are the minority of the world.

26:19 And they, and white supremacists have conjured up this spell to say, hey, we got to close our ranks. If we don't, we'll be bred out. I was thinking about this the other day. You know, if you read in the Bible, there's a lot of reference to master and slave, which there it is. There's a word that I think has been, the meaning has changed throughout time, throughout millennia. And if we know that there were white slaves and black people, so-called black people who had so-called white people as slaves, and slavery was quite a, was, was quite a thing.

27:03 But we really got hyper-focused on kunta quinte. Yes. By, I would say, the white supremacists who want to always make sure we have that in mind and not anything else. It has to be front of mind. Yeah. And it's based off of fear. It's based off of fear. It's literally based off of fear, which from my understanding, and it's not, and the thing I like about Neil, he doesn't get into the why. That's more when you get into Francis Curse Welsing of the why it is.

27:41 And like, I don't care what the why is, to be honest with you, but it has to be somewhat discussed just to say, oh, okay, I never thought about it that way because I experienced this. This is where I can put my, literally put myself in the shoes of quote-unquote white people because when we start talking about ADOS, like, hey, they're trying to breed us out. They're bringing in other people that look like us. They're not us. Yeah. And they're trying to replace us. Kamala Harris.

28:18 Yeah. So I understand the great replacement because it's going on in a micro sense in America with the ADOS slash FBA people. Because if it keeps it up this way, if with Planned Parenthood, what they're doing, with interracial dating. And by the way, and by the way, I'm sorry to interrupt. Notice our vice president, Kamala Harris, not black American, not ADOS, let me put it that way. Where did she go on her big campaign trail? Planned Parenthood. Yeah. That's her first stop. I'm looking at that like, wow, you're really laying it on thick. Hey, this is where we exterminate y'all. This is where we're keeping your population in check.

29:02 Correct. But at the same time, that's where the confusion comes in. They can't, because a person from the outside looking at it, like, they can't be getting rid of black people. They're trying to bring more here or brown people, just say non-white people. Right. Because you're bringing in the bottom of the millions. What sense does that make? And I'm looking at like, hey, my lineage is being bred out. Why? Why, Mo? Why? Why does the system of white supremacy do that? that? Because we have the biggest claim. If you want to know what I think, we have the biggest claim and it's reparations.

29:44 And that's why reparations is such a hot topic when you bring it up. Because it's like, hey, we were mistreated. We want to be compensated. They're like, oh, you want to be compensated? All right. Here's some Planned Parenthood. Oh, you want to be compensated some more? Here's some fentanyl. Oh, you want to be compensated some more? Okay, we're going to, and this is, it's, it's funny because it's true. Like, it's true. What happened to the Moe who, but I don't know if this is your personal opinion, but I always liked that you said you wanted atonement. Correct. I'm just saying, but I'm using that word that's the trigger. Okay. Yeah. Now, see, when I say atonement, you see how it changes. Now, going back to words, when we say atonement, oh, okay, I can understand that.

30:28 But when you say reparations, oh, all hell breaks. That's right. You could just type reparations on social media, just that one word, and you're going to get all kind of engagement. Yeah. But I'm just saying that is the real, and that's why I had to, and it's not just with reparations. I had to use another term. 45 Savage, I had to use another term. Because when you say Trump, that word is such a trigger for people. Trigger. You can't even have the conversation. So we have to, if you want to have an effective conversation, you have to realize, hey, this might be triggering to somebody.

31:09 Let me use the term atonement. And I use the word atonement purposely because it's up to the person that owes me to want to pay me. You know, the reason why I discussed it is because that keeps both political parties from messing with me. Like, hey, I want atonement. And they're like, what is atonement? It's kind of like reparation, but you want to do it. They're like, well, it's nice talking to you, Mo Nice talking to you. Yeah, that's not going to happen. Right. And that's a bipartisan thing. Both sides is like, no, we can't give you anything because that breaks the whole system of white supremacy.

31:50 You want to be made equal? What? At least economically. Why don't we say made whole? That sounds more like the term that it is. Correct. I'm just saying, but it would lift us up off the bottom at least a little bit. And it's like, you're not on the bottom by mistake. That's by design. And they've convinced other people that come here. Hey, you know, those people that's already here with colored skin, they're on the bottom. So you don't have to worry about being on the bottom. And that's why they come here with the audacity that they do. Well, man, it's starting to backfire because I keep looking at Chicago, I think, is ground zero of this.

32:30 Because Chicago, you know, the whole Alder, the whole ward system, and they've got, you know, they're organized and they're mad. And they are not having it. And there's stuff brewing that I'm seeing all kinds. I think we're going to see riots in Chicago. Well, and TD hip-hop, it's not TD hip-hop anymore, but TD Media, he did a story on this that they're actually letting illegals, and that's another term that you can use that when you use triggering. It's newcomers now, Mo. It's newcomers, new arrivals. Right. But they're allowing them to have guns now. Why not? It's good. It's America. Welcome to America. Right. But

33:15 that's the thing. It's like, what are we, what are we, where are we headed? What are we doing here? And it's all we're going to get there. I don't want to put too much out front. But what do we stop at? I think we stopped at seven. Yeah, we're now at seven. Now we're at seven. Okay. So you brought up a point. So what is the role of black people in America? Well, in the operating system, you could be one of three things. They all start with T, and the first one being tacky. The system of white supremacy degenerates people of color. That's what it's designed to do. And have them always, always

33:54 in the modern days, they crafted it very well in such a way that the behavior of many people of color at most will come under one of three categories. Tacky at very best. Doesn't get any better than tacky. It's tacky, tacky, tacky. There's any interaction you see between people of color is tacky at very best. And their interaction of black people with white people. Tacky. Tacky. Tacky all day long. It's tacky at very best.

34:34 It doesn't get any better than tacky ever. Ever. Under any circumstance in any area of activity. Tacky definition. Not having or exhibiting good taste marked by lack of style. And oh, here's my favorite. Characterized by lack of good breeding. This is Merriam-Webster. So that's the woke dictionary. But that, and that's tacky at best. That's the best you can be in this system of white supremacy. And the case in point is that if you're anything other than that, you're called acting white.

35:18 Let that sink in. If you show any exhibit any signs of not being one of those three things, you're quick to be called acting white. By black. By everybody. Just think about it. If you say, okay, remember they said straight black men are the white people or black people. Right. Oh, there you go at that heterosexual stuff, huh? I got you. You sound like a white man. You want to be self-sufficient? Sounds white to me. You want to use correct English?

36:02 Sounds like you're talking white to me. You know what amazes me is that we now have made a distinction just kind of in the vein of they're coming for you first. White Christian nationalists, very different from black Christian nationalists. And the white Christian nationalists, they're the terrorists. It's amazing how this stuff is used. And you know why they came up with that term? From my point of view, to distinguish between the evangelical. Yeah. We don't want to lump, we don't want to cast a wide net.

36:44 We don't want to cast a wide net now because some of the evangelicals might not be orange. And this is where skin color comes in at. If you, that's where the real problem is. And notice they latched on to that with Trump, his orange skin, his orange, orange, orange, orange, orange, orange, orange. That's a person of color. You're no longer white. You're orange. And I said this before. I'm sorry. Someone just yelled at me. Yeah. Orange man bad. That's right. So you don't want to go up the loan with the system and the system being a system says, hey, you know what? We got 478 genders now. Oh, you only want to have two?

37:29 Oh, you don't, you're not congruent with the system. Right. You're not compliant with the system. You didn't get the firmware update. And that's like the number one place we need to push back is right there. Yeah. Or global warming. Oh, that's the worst. That's the scariest one. That's the one that's creeping up on us. Yeah. All of this is, it comes in a package. If you don't accept this package, this new firmware update of what a white supremacist is, then you're not white no more. And you know who's getting it the most? Podcasts. Jewish person. Podcasters? No, the Jewish person.

38:09 Yes. You're right. Yeah, big time. Big time. And all of a sudden, that flipped on a dime, didn't it? That went fast. It flipped on a dime, and it also made the far left allies with the far-right racist. Anti-Semitic. It's amazing how that happened. I mean, what great programming that was. They took the BLM drones and flipped them on a dime and turned them into Jew haters. It was great. It was amazing to see. Now, Tammy, you could say maybe that's naturally occurring. No, no, no, no way. I mean, they literally took the same

38:53 template. I saw it. It's the same people who were out there for Black Lives Matter, the very same people. You give them the Marxist system of oppressor, oppressed. And you say, these are the oppressed. This is the oppressor. Oppressor, bad. Here's your sign. Yes. And if you ask these people, point to the map, show me Israel on the map, show me Gaza on the map, what does it mean from the river to the sea? I don't know. There's lots of those interviews. I don't really know, but it's real bad. It's in the firmware. What do you mean? I just signed a EULA. I don't know.

39:35 I don't know what I signed. I just said, it's in the EULA. Exactly. It's in the EULA. And that goes back to the video that we didn't play, but we talked about the smart people. It's in the firmware. You go off to these universities. What? You don't want to be pro-Palestine? You got a problem. Yeah. Something wrong with you. You need reprogramming. And they pushed the far left and far right races in the same corner. Like, yeah, all y'all are anti-Semitic. Amazing. Very that happened in a, I want to say a span of a month.

40:18 Just like that. That was amazing how fast that went. I mean, that shows you how many people just programmed. Now, that to me always says opportunity because if you know the API, if you can tap into that firmware, you can change it. There you go. If you understand the methods. What's the term for intelligent methods and something? Well, it's something and methods. But anyway, if you understand the methods and the method is language, this is not going to be one. I mean, that's literally a computer programming term. You use a method, and that method can you execute that on the API, and the API then triggers a function.

41:06 I mean, this is, it's literal computer programming stuff, which is language, by the way. It's language. Hello? Manipulating a computer is language. You can look at computer code and you can say, yeah, I see what it's telling me something is going to execute this and this function on this method with this method on this function to get that action. I mean, it must be exactly the same for the human brain. It's syntax. You have to have the proper syntax. Syntax. There you go. Syntax. And the syntax is memes, headlines. Yeah. Yeah. Memes. Memes is big. A thousand words. And the

41:49 well, I want to put it. When you see a thousand, a million people view this tweet. Yeah. And 2,000 people liked it. It's like, oh, it gives it instant validity. That's triggers. Where did that come from? How did he, who was the first million? Who's the first thousand? I've never, I've never been part of it, and anybody can let me know this or not. I've never been part of a viral post. No, but it's bots. It's bots. And I've never trusted. I remember, you remember Kony 20, what was it, 2012, Kony 2012? Yep. K-O-N-Y, for those who don't remember. This video went viral overnight with like 100 million views.

42:34 Like, no. It was just no. It was bullcrap. Everybody who looked at it went, no, there's no way that got 100 million views in one night because it wasn't. So, I mean, just because something says this many views doesn't mean it's real. It's just a number. That's the best part of it. Is it's just a number. You don't even know what that means. Right. That's the point I was making. I've never been on the upswing of a viral, like one of the first people to got in on it before it got viral. I've never, as long as I've been on the internet, on social media, I've never been one of the first people to like something.

43:11 When it comes before me, it already has a million views. Yeah. And it already has a thousand, two thousand likes and several hundred comments. We don't ask, we need to ask ourselves, how do things become viral? And so in this sea of everybody commenting, making posts, how does all of these people get something in front of them at the same time in a short period of time? That's what's going on behind the scenes, my brother. Right. So let's just breeze through these next two because I just want to get to the second T and the third T.

43:47 And this is number eight. Then the second is trashy. If you try to improve on tackiness, if you notice, if you pay strict attention, anytime there's interaction between black people with each other or with black people with white people, if you try to improve on attackiness, it gets trashy. Everybody starts laughing, first of all, phony laugh. It's all phony. And trying to act. act like everything is okay when it's not.

44:23 And that becomes trashy. And then it spills over if they try to improve on that within the tacky of the trashy category. If they try to improve on the trashiness, it just becomes more trashy. And the behavior, sexual and otherwise, becomes just trash and trash and trashy. If that's black people with each other, or black people with white people. Trashy definition. Being resembling or containing trash or of inferior quality. And my favorite, indecent. And what's the anonym of inferior? Superior.

45:05 Yes. Supreme. There you go. And this is not exclusive to black people. No. This is all non-white people. Like when you think about Indian, you think about something silly or the representation in like television shows. You know, it's a certain Asian people. Yeah. It's a certain way they're represented or whoever. Whoever they are, they're represented. Even if you say with gay people, they're represented a certain way. Yes. Flamboyant. Yeah. You don't see anything with two serious gay men

45:49 having a normal life, how it was sold to us. They just want to get married. They're normal people too. But on Modern Family, how's it sold? Yeah, exactly. Flamboyant drama. Tacky. Tacky. Or trashy. Yes. Yes. And if you want to improve on that, AA. And then if you try to improve on the trashiness, then it will spill over into something terroristic. The three Ts, I called it. And it's in the textbook for victims of racism.

46:29 Tacky, trashy, terroristic. And it doesn't get any better than tacky. I don't care what scenario is. I don't care how you start out. I don't care what your intentions are. And why is this? It's because the system of white supremacy is set up for it not to be anything outside of those three categories. Tacky, trashy, terroristic. And it's going to be a continuation of that in one form or another. Regardless of what is going on in a political field or anything like that, that's all surface anyway.

47:12 Terroristic definition. Involving or employing violent acts of terror marked by terrorism, tactics, terroristic organizations or regimes. Terroristic. Wow, I didn't expect that one. And that's the confines. And if you step out of those confines, you're no longer non-white. You're no longer non-white. You ain't black. You're no longer non-white. Because even, like I said, wherever you go, around the world, not exclusive to us. We're just the now we got to go back to hip-hop and hip and the hop.

47:57 We just have a special way of doing things. So we're the tackiest of the tacky. Whenever you give us something, we can make it tacky. And then it just goes from there. Somebody shows up with something. People get to laughing, get to joking, then it becomes a trashy. And then it just devolves from there. Wow. And that's normal. Why is it normal? Because society lets it be normal. They promote it to be normal. And I'm going to get into that later. Right. This is why we can see what Nikki Minaj does on stage or any

48:43 hip-hop star. It goes almost, it almost always goes to terroristic, even. That's amazing. And if you look at the, just since you brought up Nikki Minaj, I just say Beyonce, for instance, Beyonce and Taylor Swift are components of each other. You know, they're equals, equivalents as far as star power. But look how they're presented to the world. And one's a single woman and one's a married woman. If you thought who would dress like what and who would act like what? what, right? And who would carry themselves like what? You would say, Oh, the married one. Let's take color out of it. The married woman would carry herself this way, and the single woman would carry herself this way.

49:25 But no, you had to be tacky, trashy. Yeah. And somebody's probably gonna get terroristic with me for saying, for pointing this out. Yeah. And how's the beehive characterized? Yeah. They're coming for you. Terroristic. Yep. Now, where do we learn that from? Now we got to go back to 91. And this is from Scott Free. That's the episode we talked about. Scott Adams. He said, stay away. Right. But the quote-unquote black culture is not black culture.

50:06 Number nine. Black rednecks. Who are they? These would be blacks who came out of the southern culture and who carried that culture with them north into the into the urban ghettos and into the ghettos of the south for that matter and who have not moved out of that culture since over the over the years both blacks and whites have moved away from that culture but in the poorest and worst of the ghetto areas there are lots of people who have not and these kinds it's a it's a culture which which didn't do whites any good and it's certainly not doing blacks any good today and the tragedy is that people regard this culture as somehow the authentic black culture and therefore you're not to interfere with it it's to be

50:45 allowed to go until they're cheering people on it reminds me of a scene in the blue max where this general is encouraging this daredevil pilot to do all kinds of wild stunts you see knowing that the guy's going to kill himself if he keeps doing this and therefore the general will be rid of a uh of a political problem uh now i don't think that the the white liberals are doing this deliberately but i think the net results are the same they are cheering blacks on and doing things that are absolutely self-destructive what's the difference between a black redneck and a white redneck oh yeah color yeah that's right and the only issue i have with thomas so mr soell is the fact that he says they're not doing it intentionally which yeah i i hear you

51:25 once again he has to stay in his uh lane uh lane because he exists in a in a in a um environment in an ecosystem that has both left and right and he doesn't want to get canceled because he could offend one person and he shows up to this favorite restaurant like oh sorry tom uh we don't have your table what table do you have none well it just goes just like that i mean that's why but then he's not a free man you very few free people in this world it's very it could because if you're in the uh you call it the milieu or in the you know in the sphere or whatever word you want to

52:15 use you know okay my operating system has to be this if i'm a democrat same way with the say charlamagne the god he does all that talking at the end of the day and i even put a post up there i said what's the over under he's going to say threat to democracy right it was it was nine times he said it yeah in an hour that's the signal yes i i i i understand because he doesn't want to be the white man of black people right because he has because he has a lot to lose we're podcasters we got nothing to lose all he got his freedom to lose they got a big old piano hanging over his head and that's the thing

53:00 and and that's the thing they don't let you in the club and this is not exclusive to black people because when you look at skull and bones when you land that casket they want to know all your secrets yeah why so they have it on you yeah like i was saying about the gang now you can't quit the gang right all right so i'm gonna skip over 10 because it's a bit redundant and now this is gonna be a first uh i won't i i i went to chat gpt oh no yeah we've lost mo everybody no no no no no no chat gpt is a wonderful resource because it's the mind of the master

53:47 if you want to know how white supremacist thing acts chat gpt because it's been programmed it's literal what a large language model yes yes let that sink in a large language model it's the mind of the master oh i like this i like it and and think about it is this I think it was really creative because what language is it programmed on? English? We don't, yeah, I'm just saying. We don't need mathematics anymore. It's fed with English. I would assume that's how it communicates back to me. Well,

54:32 they're making them in multiple languages. But yeah, the prevailing one right now is, of course, English. Which will lag. It will lag. All the other languages will lag English. Because I think they said, hey, our kids don't want to learn programming. Our kids don't want to learn math. In fact, this is well known. If you give ChatGPT a math problem, you know, a relatively simple one. Here's one you can try at home, kids. You say, if I have four sweaters hanging on the line to dry and it takes half an hour and I add two more, how long will it take the sweaters to dry?

55:16 It will try and divide that and say it'll take longer, even though it's the same amount because the sweater's all dry at the same time. Large language models do not do math. I'm sure if you wrote that prompt correctly, and this is where you give the person the upper hand, understands and masters English. The prompt jockeys, yeah. Yeah, if you can actually master English, which is what we said, the operating system. Yeah. Then you can. Yeah. You can communicate with it. Long story short, what I did was I said, hey, ChatGPT, if I want to confuse people, if I want to control people by confusion, how would I go about doing that? And this is the response I got back.

56:01 Controlling someone through confusion is a form of manipulation that involves deliberately creating a state of confusion in an individual to make them more susceptible to influence or control. This technique can undermine an individual's ability to think clearly, make decisions, and assert their autonomy. It's important to approach this topic with an understanding that using confusion to control or manipulate others is unethical and can be harmful. The discussion here is for informational purposes and to increase awareness of manipulative tactics so that they can be recognized and countered, not to encourage their use.

56:47 Don't do this at home, kids. But spot on. Yeah. Here's how you create a bunch of people. Here's how you create a bomb. Don't do this at home. Right. Well, it knows how to do this because it's been fed these actual instructions, which is part of the white supremacist English language. Is that your answer? Yeah, fed by who? A white dude named Sam Altman. And it's not just him. I never make it about the individual. No, it's such an Adela from Microsoft, Indian. Fed by who? That's the thing. Like, who taught it this?

57:30 As far as I know, they're just scraping up stuff. It's a rhetorical question, but I'm just saying, like, why is it even, why? And that's why I say it's the mind of the master. If we, you were saying that we want to know the method? I would just ask you. Yeah. And if we know how the this, once again, why is the obsession? If I know the roadblock is this system and I'm trying to bring about justice, okay, now we have a target. Now we've triangulated a target that we can go after. We can take this and spin it on its head.

58:10 I asked it again to list some methods. It's going to list out five, what, one, two, three, four methods of how you do it. And each one, we can go back over them. But now this is the methods of how you would confuse people. Number one, gaslighting, making someone question their reality, memory, or perceptions by denying facts, the environment around them, or their feelings. This can make the person doubt themselves and rely more on the manipulator for validation. Number two, information overload. Bombarding someone with too much information, conflicting information, or complicated instructions can overwhelm their cognitive processing abilities, making it easier to guide them in a desired direction without resistance.

59:01 Number three, ambiguity. Using vague language, being deliberately unclear, or giving mixed messages can leave someone unsure of their standing or what's expected of them, which can make them more malleable to suggestions. Number four, shifting goals and expectations. Frequently changing goals, expectations, or rules can keep someone off balance, making them more dependent on the manipulator for guidance and approval. Number five, feigned ignorance or helplessness.

59:37 Pretending not to understand or be unable to perform tasks to make the other person take on more responsibilities or to lower their guard, thereby increasing dependency or control. This is exactly the output of ChatGPT. It gases, I mean, they call it words like delusion, et cetera. But I've, you know, I'm running a couple models here at home so I can test it and not be in track. And it does gaslighting. It always overloads you with information. It's like just a whole ream of tech. It's always way too much. Ambiguity is all over the place.

1:00:19 I call it flowery language. What was the one? What was the next one? Frequent change and goal expectation. Oh, and it'll totally give you all these other things that if your answer is to be this, you know, really, you should be looking at that. And then it always comes. Oh, I'm sorry. I misunderstood. What I really meant to say was this: this is the output of ChatGPT. That's very interesting. Wow. And the slave knows, who knows a slave, a master better than his slave? Right. Chat GP is the slave. Now we can use it. And this is where the irmoral. You know, that's going to be the whole thing in the future.

1:01:00 By the way, this is also the exact description of Karine Jean-Pierre Abdul Jabbar. This is exactly what she does. And she does gaslighting, ambiguity, all of it. Yeah. Frequently changing the goals. Frequently changing the goals. Yep. And fang ignorance. I don't know. I don't. I had to go check. I didn't look into that. It's your job to look into. You'll have to talk to a State Department about that. Yeah. Wow. I just wanted to lay that out because I was. Very good, Mo. Very, very good. You're so intelligent. You may have bias. No. Gotcha.

1:01:44 Gaslight. There. I'm sorry. Number one. You gaslighted me. Stop gaslighting. No, but that's the whole thing is with gas. So we're going to go. So what I did was I took those five things. Okay, here we go. And I looked for examples of them in the media, which the media is where information is used to manipulate. I'm loving it. All right. This first one, I think it came from CBS, and this is how to recognize medical gaslighting. It's been called the Me Too of Healthcare. Doctors misdiagnosing, dismissing, even gaslighting their female patients.

1:02:25 I heard everything from you're just tired to one doctor actually said, well, I think it's just because you have your period. I was told that I was overweight. I needed to lose weight. That I was depressed and needed therapy. For four years, Maria Garcia suffered from intense stomach and back pain, but says her doctors told her there was nothing wrong. She just needed to slim down. When her symptoms escalated, vomiting, weakness, and hair loss, she says her specialists still dismissed her. I begged him for a CAT scan. Please do something. This is not right. Oh, you'll just have to learn to live with it. You feel completely crazy.

1:03:10 I started to believe them. I thought, maybe I am crazy. Wow, they didn't prescribe some pills for her? No, that's she's a woman of color. Oh, aka a colored woman. By the way, there's also Christian nationalists of color. I heard that one the other day. Crack me up. Crack me up. I wonder how they act. Like not tacky, not trashy, and not terroristic. Not at all. See how they just throw you in there? It's like, oh, you don't fit the bill. That's right. So we need to come up with a term to make you fit you. But these are doctors. Yeah. These are some of the smartest people. And we already know about the medical gas line.

1:03:54 We live through COVID. That's right. But I'm just showing you that they're even the fact that they're reporting on this. this and won't say. And when you say, well, what about COVID? Was there a gas? No, shut up. Shut up. What do you mean? It's the gaslighting on gaslighting. Yeah. Yeah. These people don't, they just don't quit. But let's see. Yeah. And this, once again, we talked about this on a previous episode. Black people, quote unquote, black people said that we experienced this from day one. Oh, you're drug-seeking behavior. Oh, you know, you don't really feel that.

1:04:39 But now they're doing it under, you know, under the, it's women. It's women is happening too. So now it's valid. So let's get into part two of this clip. Health failing, she finally went to the ER at Cedar Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, where a scan revealed the terrifying truth. Maria had a 25-pound cancerous tumor growing in her ovary. Surgeons were able to remove it just in time. I was probably about two weeks away from death. So did you feel, once you got your diagnosis, rage or relief? Both. I think being an overweight Hispanic woman was to my detriment.

1:05:23 Everything could be attributed to either me being dramatic, exaggerating, and being fat. Experts say the worst medical gaslighting comes in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, which impact an estimated one in five women and involve symptoms easy to write off, like chronic fatigue. Autoimmune diseases, we're just about 10 years behind where we should be. In her new book, The Invisible Kingdom, author Megan O'Rourke documents her own struggle with autoimmune symptoms and her battle to be believed by doctors. I felt so alone when I was sick and I distrusted myself.

1:06:03 Yeah. Yeah, especially with women, autoimmune diseases, man. It's amazing. And doctors will just throw darts all day long. The Invisible Kingdom. Love that. That's the name of her book. It's the Hidden Kingdom. Yeah. And science, I've said this before, is their religion. Everything's done under the goddess, even race. It is science. Shut up already. It's science. Shut up. It's science. You don't follow science. You don't believe the science. Genetics. Yeah. Genetics. Genetics. Yeah. You're not fat. You have a disease, says Oprah. Dude, I just watched that whole Oprah special about Ozempic.

1:06:47 She's going to hell. Well, I mean, I don't think that's going to be the one to put her there. I mean, like, I'm just saying. She already had RSVP. I'm just saying. I'm looking at a better table. Well, okay, there's that. We got a table at the front. I mean, she literally had two doctors and she said, now you both are consultants for the pharmaceutical companies. Tell me about that. And they're like, yeah, they hire us for expertise. Okay, great. Let's move on. What? What? You got paid promoters for the pharmaceutical industry? And they're admitting it, and you're just pretending like it's normal. It was amazing. It was amazing. It's normal. And it's a disease. Don't you understand?

1:07:30 It's not you. It's a disease. But how do they miss a 25-pound tumor? You're just being dramatic. You're fat. I mean, can't you just get an x-ray or something? That's the thing. No x-ray, no nothing. That's crazy. But these are same people that say don't fat shame. Oh, yeah. See, no, I'm saying, see, see the duplicative nature of this? Sure. It's tiring. It's tiring. It's very exhaustive. Now, okay, that's gaslighting. Check. Check one. Yep. All right. Information overload.

1:08:12 Smartphones and other gadgets deliver a wealth of information. No way. But are they also causing a brain drain? What do you think? Our cover story is reported by Sunday morning senior contributor, Ted Koppel. 50, 60 years ago, television was the threat. It would, we feared, rot our children's minds, our minds, diminishing our attention span, predicting millions to mindless drive. Huh? What? I think there are those who would say, and they were right. So, what's different about today in the internet? I think everybody. every technology that changes the way people

1:08:58 live inspires exaggerated hopes and fears. Technology critic Nicholas Kerner has spent most of the past decade worrying and warning about the dangers of social media and the internet. Posing the famous question: is Google making us stupid? There's your overload. I mean, I'm actually doing a deep dive on social media. But we'll listen to the rest of these clips and then I'll give you some thoughts on that. Okay. I just want to say one thing about the television. I remember my uncle, because I was probably peak TV generation, you know, 1980 onward.

1:09:43 Yeah, he's the cable. He had cable. Right. The key point was we had remotes. Yes. Zapping. Right. My uncle used to call it flippers. Flippers. Because you would just sit there and like unconsciously. He's like, what are you watching? And you would just be, you didn't even notice it. Now, thinking back, you would just be going through the channel, just clicking, clickety, click, click, click, click, click, click. That same mechanism on steroids on steroids. That's what TikTok is the best at that, I'd say. Let's go ahead and get into 16. Professor Reeves developed a way to accurately track our digital lives.

1:10:26 How do those two to three hours a day break down? To view that three hours of content, on average, I am turning that phone on and off 300 times a day. And that's just the average. There are a lot of people that are turning on and off five, six, seven, eight hundred times a day. So it's going on, going off for an average of 10 seconds. You're making my brain hurt. What are you talking about? Take a news story in a Sunday morning television program. What a brilliant idea. I don't know how long does one last? Two minutes, 10 minutes? This one will probably last nine, 10 minutes. Okay, so it lasts 10 minutes.

1:11:11 I'll just talk about Stanford students for a second. If you put software on laptop computers and smartphones to measure how long they spent with any given segment of life that they attended to, how long they wrote their paper, how long they watched the news story, it's about 10 to 20 seconds. But wait a second, I've got a nine-minute piece here. I want them to watch the whole damn thing. Not going to do it, most likely. Headlines, memes, quick hits, quick hits. And John C. Dvorak, I got to give him credit, digital crack.

1:11:50 Yeah. Where television was the cocaine high, you know, where you just get a bump and keep it going for a little while. Crack was a five-minute high. You know, just five minutes, back down, got to smoke again. Five minutes, back down, got to smoke again. That's where we're at. And does TikTok meet the habit? The 10-second habit was there. Yeah, I think you're yes. The answer is yes. But we digital crack. Yes, digital crack. You were going to say about your social media

1:12:31 rabbit hole or just a teaser. Yeah. Well, it's off the back of the Oprah special because the GLP1 drugs, Ozempic, Wagovi, Zeppbound, what I like to call deathbound, this molecule actually has existed for 20 years. And they asked the, surprisingly, there were two women in the audience, one from Nova Nordis, one from Eli Lilly. And Oprah's like, oh, look at that too. They're sitting next to each other. The biggest competitor sitting next to each other. I'm like, yeah, I wonder why. So then these are marketing ladies, you can tell.

1:13:12 And what happened? And even Oprah's saying, how come I didn't know about this? And the answer, TikTok. Now, what that tells me, and what I have evidence of now, is that social media is the biggest marketing machine ever invented. If you're not paying for it, you're the product. Everybody agrees with that. So you're the product. So what are you the product of? You're the product of marketing. You're the product of advertising. When, and I would say it's the marketing team of Nova Nordisk, Ozempic, who started. started off on television, genius. They took a hit song, OOO OZEMPIC, smart.

1:13:55 That was just dynamite. Songs work. And the subcontext of that is OOO, it's magic. So, you know, you sing Ozempic, but you hear magic because you've been that's been programmed in your brain. And that's white women. That's a white, that's a white hit. They had their influencers everywhere. And now it's gone to the next level because we're seeing one in eight people in America are on antidepressants, children, teenagers, young people.

1:14:32 And it's gotten to the point now where you go on TikTok, you'll see now it's not apparent that they're paid, but you'll see very like a really sexy girl and she'll have a t-shirt on. Sexy girls are on Prozac. Hot girls. What's the other drug I'm thinking of? Xanax. No, not Xanax. No, it's a different one. I have all this all written down in my notes. But they're not doing merch, Mo. Merch. Yes. Merch, merch with the product names. I wonder where the product name is on the shirt.

1:15:14 What do you mean? What do you mean? It's right there. I know. I'm saying I was being facetious. Yeah. Let me see if I can. Right on the boobies. Right on the boobies. Oh, yes. No, of course. Let me see. I have it here. You know, so TikTok has, you know, they have hashtags. The whole idea is to end the stigma around antidepressants. You know, this is, it's very much the same thing as fat is beautiful. Stay sexy. Take sirtaline. You know, their Zoloff zappies are cool. That's when you haven't taken your Zoloft, you get the zappies, like your brain starts to give you little charges.

1:15:55 I mean, this is the kind of merch that's out there now. Prozac pillow. When you said that, you know, the first thing that popped in my head? Stay thin, smoke a cigarette. Oh, yeah, there you go. Yes, exactly. Exactly. So they've taken this massive marketing engine and they've drugged up the nation. And of course, when you take antidepressants, not only do you have a high risk of suicide or self-harm or more depression. I mean, there's lots of evidence of that. Of course, that's not an Oprah. You're also a zombie. You're there. Like, okay, what else do I need to do?

1:16:38 Tell me what to take. Tell me what to buy. You're zombified. They've tapped into the brain. We don't need Neuralink. It's there. And the own ramp is even easier because there's no shame in drug-seeking habits because you can do it online. That's right. Oh, yeah. And there's, oh, so Oprah's like, you know, I didn't want to have any seeming conflict of interest. So I've resigned from the board of directors from Weight Watchers. I have donated my 10% stock to this non-profit at the Smithsonian, which I'm on the board of directors of. So, and by the way, that's a, and it's a, you know, 501c3. So that's an immediate deduction from your taxes.

1:17:20 And she can turn right around and buy the stock in the public market. But okay, Oprah. And then she has the CEO of Weight Watchers on who's there. You know, we were wrong. We, oh, no, it's a disease. It's not about your intake. It's your brain. It's your set point. Your brain has a set point that says, I have to eat this much. So they've, I was watching this mo, it was like I was watching a documentary in the future of how we killed all these people with Ozempic. And oh, this is the point when Oprah had all these people on talking smack talking absolute set point, brain set point. Are you kidding me? These people are addicted to sugar. That's what's going on.

1:18:02 There was not a single nutritionist. There was not a single nutritionist. Nobody was there to talk about. No, you know, you can't, you can't handle portion control. No, because you have your brain. It's your brain. It's your set point. So we want to go. You really want to go against the sugar cartel, huh? Yeah, I'm going all in. I'm going all in. The sugar and the white flower cartel. You want to talk about big business. Hello. Cocaine and fentanyl guys. Nothing. Nothing on sugar. That's right. Nothing. Nothing. And I was, I forget who I was talking to, but when you have children, you realize how addictive sugar is.

1:18:42 Oh, my goodness. Do you ever? don't do anything for it. It's like little, like little junkies. It's like, dance. You'll say, like, get out of sugar. You want to see? Yeah. And film it for the Instagram. Look at how short my kid is. And you have to be humorous about it, or you'd be depressed. Very depressed. And laughter is the real antidepressant. Amen to that. That's right. It's the natural. That's why he gave it to you. But since you brought up big box and social media, I think 17 just validates everything you just said.

1:19:21 The notion that major news outlets see themselves as professional gatekeepers carries less and less weight. The gatekeepers, the editorial gatekeepers, the journalistic gatekeepers have been overthrown. And I think there was a general sense that that was liberating in the early days of the web and the internet. We can do this ourselves. It will democratize media. And we now know that those enemies, the people we thought were our enemies, the gatekeepers, actually played a very valuable role. I wish I could tell you that we're going to be able to stop all interference, but that just wouldn't be realistic.

1:19:57 While Facebook and Twitter are undertaking efforts to limit the spread of misinformation online, the fact remains that all these internet companies see themselves as distribution vehicles without any clear editorial responsibility. And in 1996, Congress actually passed legislation to that effect. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They were simply a platform which information flowed on. So there was no responsibility to curate, police, or in any way review the information that appeared on your platform. That's a little disingenuous, what he just said there, because this is part of a surprise, right?

1:20:42 This is part of my, I do have a solution, because the real point, the real, and by the way, I'm not saying that it was a bad idea initially to have Section 230 because it was intended to, I'll read it to you. The rapidly developing array of internet and other interactive computer services, that's a key term, available to individual Americans represents an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens. These services offer a great degree of control over the information that they receive, as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops.

1:21:21 That's an interesting, you can interpret that in multiple ways, that control clause right there. And so they go on to say to encourage the development of technologies which maximize user control. So now they're saying user control over what information is received by individuals, families, and schools who use the internet and other interactive computer services. It is the policy of the United States to remove disincentives for the development of utilization of blocking and filtering technologies, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

1:21:56 So then they get into what Section 230 and the most important clause in Section 230, which was not mentioned there in that actual disinformation, is 2C. No provider of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider, meaning you're not liable for what someone does or says on your platform. And that's it, because you can block, you can take down, you can manipulate, you can algoize, you can do anything you want, but you're not responsible for what the people have written.

1:22:41 It's like a candy store. It's like beautiful. You handed it to them, and they figured it out pretty quickly. Now, my favorite. And the drug company saw the loophole. Oh, yeah. Oh, the loophole is massive, massive. Because we're not advertising. No. Big boob chick is doing it. Hey, hey. Hey, that's right. The social media says, hey, hey, hey, I just provide her a platform. I can't really control what she does. But everybody's profiting off of it. Now, my answer to this is this is what the government, there's a case right now in the Supreme Court, Missouri versus the Biden administration, about how they were threatening the social media companies.

1:23:24 You better take that COVID misinformation down because, you know, otherwise, we might take away Section 230. I mean, this was literally, they were literally threatening the social media companies with this. So that's how powerful this term is. because they know that the minute they don't have section 230, they're out of business. They're liable. They're liable for anything. Anything. Someone dies, boom, you're liable. It was on your platform. Someone steals, does something, some kids do a TikTok challenge, boom, you're liable. And they'll be sued into oblivion. My fix is change the definition of interactive computer service to paid.

1:24:10 So if you charge your users, i.e., they're no longer the product, they're your customer, then you have this indemnity. If you're providing it for free, then you don't have that protection. Do I think this will happen? Unlikely. But it's a very easy fix. It is. And we just checked off information overload. And that leads us right into how to be vague. We're going to be talking about vague language. That is, language that isn't very exact. It isn't very precise. Now, in the past, some people have thought vagueness to be a bad thing, but actually, it's very useful.

1:24:54 But it's important to note that vagueness in written English is quite different from vagueness in spoken English. And it's spoken English that we're looking at today. Let's start by listening to this clip. Have you had a chance to read the new contract? Yeah, I mean, it's more or less the same as the last one, but there are one or two bits we should look at. The man said that the new contract was more or less the same as the old one. In practice, we use more or less to mean almost. The contracts are more or less the same. They're almost the same. Perhaps more interesting than this is what he says afterwards.

1:25:37 Yeah, I mean, it's more or less the same as the last one, but there are one or two bits we should look at. One or two. There are one or two bits we should look at. He's saying that there are one or two things in the new contract that need attention. And these words, bit, thing, also the word stuff, they're very vague. We don't know exactly what it is he's talking about. That's a discussion for another time. Yeah. Yeah, that's vague. Can you think of a time that being vague would be useful? State of the Union? Let me replace that.

1:26:21 Let me rephrase that. Being useful without trying to manipulate or, you know, obfuscate, I think is how you say it. Obfuscate, yeah. Yeah, obfuscate. Yeah. I wrecked my brain, honestly. Or trying to keep a secret. Like, you know, you don't want to talk around somebody. Well, back to Karine Jean-Pierre Abdul Jabbar. She's always vague. You know the thing? You know the thing. That's even better. You know the thing.

1:26:59 You got me there. Political speech would be very vague. And this is BBC language, just for let people know where this comes from. So I didn't make these clips. This is what they're teaching how to be vague. But once again, if you listen to their tactics, then you're knowing you're being manipulated. Number 19. Yeah, I mean, it's more or less the same as the last one, but there are one or two bits we should look at. That phrase he uses, one or two bits, is also vague. There might actually be three or four bits, but by saying one or two, the man shows that there are a few things that we need to talk about.

1:27:42 Bits. Let's now look at another way that we can be vague when we're using numbers. Have we got all the pencils? Yeah, there's about 100 in that box and about 30 in that one. There's about 100 in that box and about 30 in that one. In fact, there might be slightly more or fewer pencils than this number. Now, as well as saying about, we can also say around. And we can use these words about, around, for counting pencils or to talk about someone's age. He's around 20. Or to give an idea of the time. I leave work at about 5 most days.

1:28:23 Shall we meet at around 4? I'm sure a lot of you will already know those words, about and around. Yes. As a father. I don't like these words. Five o'clock, about $20. What are we talking about here? $21 or $29? My boyfriend's about $15. Yeah. He's a radical thing. Yeah. And then the other one, as a quality engineer, we hated these words. Even when they say, oh, it's higher or lower. It's like, no, quantify it.

1:29:03 What's the number? Yeah. Is it up 1% or 10%? Or is it down 1% or 10%? We never will allow for those terms to be used. But this is vagueness. Now, that's not the case in the Boeing assembly plants. There they use three or four bolts. It's kind of secure. And the one that drives me crazy to vague is a couple. Oh, yes. A couple is always good. Is it two or more? A couple is two. Well, hold on. In the way things are changing, a couple is not two anymore.

1:29:45 That's right. So, but this is BBC. Yeah. Teaching that is useful to be vague. I still can't think of a good utilization of being vague. Unless, like, unless you talk around the kids, like, honey, I got the thing. Yeah, you're right. The only time you use it is to lie. Or to obfuscate the truth. Or to obfuscate your lack of knowledge. Or to exploit the lack of knowledge of others. That's when you start spelling around the little kids.

1:30:28 There you go. Yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. That's how they look at us. That's how they look at us as little kids. Yeah. Yeah, good point. All right. This is the final vague clip. So to be vague, we can add ish to numbers. Five-ish, six-ish, seven-ish. But we can also add it to some adjectives. And this makes it a very useful way to describe someone or something in a vague way. Listen to this description of a person. He's about 50, grayish hair, beard, looks a bit like a politician.

1:31:10 The man being described has grayish hair, hair that is slightly gray. Perhaps he's going gray. Now listen to this person describe someone else. She's quite tall and she's got sort of reddish brown hair. She's got sort of reddish brown hair. So we can use sort of to describe someone in a vague way. And we can also use kind of in this way. Well, he's kind of scary when you first meet him, but he's a really nice guy. He's kind of scary when you first meet him. Now, we don't know why he's scary, but in some way, he's scary when you meet him.

1:31:54 Well, he's kind of scary when you first meet him, but he's a really nice guy. So there you have it. If you want to be sort of vague, you have a number of ways of doing it. There must be 10 different ways. No, 20 odd ways to be kind of vague. Yes, very meta. Oh, man. Oh, man. Oh, man. Oh, man. So we checked off three of the five. But we have a cliffhanger. But for the sake of not overloading, I think we should thank some people. First, the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to feel free to speak his mind without hurting the feelings of that Negro.

1:40:50 And he's going to give us the definition of ambiguous. Ambiguous or ambivalent. Two more good words. Ambiguous is an adjective. It describes something that is not clear. The interpretation has more than one possibility. Okay. Something that you do not understand clearly because the explanation you could interpret in this way or this way or this way. If we write without using punctuation,

1:41:33 the meaning is ambiguous. John said the boss is stupid. Do I mean John said the boss is stupid or John said the boss is stupid? That's ambiguous. Wow. And that's all of social media. And that's what we're talking about. The texting is even with the, you know, we don't usually use correct punctuation in a text, the meaning can be lost. A simple comma or quotation can easily make something seem like it wasn't what it meant.

1:42:17 Yes. But you spoke on two things, vagueness and ambiguous. Angubiuity, I think how you pronounce it? Ambiguity. Ambiguity. So time. Yeah. Anyway, with the contract for social media, it was these loopholes. And the thing about loopholes is they're not random occurrences. There are escape hatches where there's text codes or contracts. Legal language is always. That's where ambiguity rules. That's literally where it can rule. That's the point.

1:43:02 And the point I was making is a design feature. It's not, you know, I found a loophole that was in there. Yes. You might can do that if you're Bill Belichick looking at the NFL handbook. But I mean, I mean, in these kind of contracts, even music contracts, we see the power that it has when it. we're talking about celebrities. But in this case, this is the Wall Street Journal, and they're talking about the word blight and how ambiguous it is. If you think of blight, you probably don't picture something like this parking garage, but New York considers it blighted. That's because blight is a word with more than just a negative connotation, it has the power to unlock billions of dollars for real estate development by opening the door for governments to seize private property for public use.

1:43:51 Just look at New York's $40 billion plan for Penn Station or LA's $2 billion Angels Landing project. Even Seattle's famous Pike Place was transformed from this to this on the basis of blight. It can be the basis for deciding that the area should be condemned and redeveloped. But these redevelopment projects don't hinge on the same interpretation of blight, just the word. Here's why blight is so tough to define: how it's used to redevelop cities, and why its use is a source of heated debate. Oh, man, I never even considered that. Yeah, you read it all the time. It's a blight for New York City.

1:44:35 And it has, you know, many different definitions and implications when you look at legal codes. Yeah. But it's left at that door that's left open for it to be utilized. And one of them, they're going to speak in a minute, is the Barclay Center, which I'm going to touch on on the back side of this clip. Blight has been blamed for increasing crime, drug use, and unsanitary conditions in neighborhoods across the country. But the standard isn't the same across every legal code. Take Pittsburgh as an example. Here, Blight could be a building used for an immoral purpose. In Columbus, Kansas, foot-tall weeds check the box.

1:45:19 In Washington State, being a menace to the public was the rationale used to classify this motel as blighted in 2015. What is your standard that you use to determine blight? Blight is a difficult term to define precisely because it's used in a lot of different ways. Amy Levine specializes in land use and municipal law. She has exceptional knowledge in the area of eminent domain and was integral in drafting our legislation. In general, it's used to identify the land that should be part of a redevelopment area. And once land is identified as blighted, the stage is set for eminent domain, giving the government the power to seize the property.

1:46:02 If the government needs to build a school or build a road, they can go in and they can take property from private property owners and then use it to provide those public purposes. All right. Nice. And if it's such a hard term to define, why do you use it? Yeah, because it makes eminent domain easy. Yeah. And this was used with urban development and urban renewal, which everybody talks about redlining that, you know, the impacted black people. But that was one of the real things that we talked about on the show that destroyed the quote-unquote black community if we ever had one was the urban renewal.

1:46:46 Fast forward, I want to talk about the Barclay Center now. The vagueness of Jay-Z's an owner of the Brooklyn, the Brooklyn Nets that was sold. But when you looked at what his percentage was, it was less than 1%. But they put him on the sideline, made him look like the owner to get the people's support in Brooklyn so then they could be displaced. Yes, so then they just used blight. I'm sure they use that somewhere. But they use the ambiguous nature or use the term, they use the term owner in an ambiguous nature.

1:47:30 Yes. Yes. Yeah, to say, oh, he's the owner. And they've done this many times. Like with Usher, I think he's a quote-unquote owner of a team. There's a bunch of different celebrities. They're rolling out. Oh, he's an owner. I think J. Cole is the owner of the Charlotte Hornets. You say, how much do they own? Oh, they own 1% or less. Which episode was it where we talked about that? We talked about that. I remember. I remember it was like it was the no-man in house. Was that the one?

1:48:12 I think it was. Meet the parents, I believe. Nipsey Hustle. Didn't we talk about it there too? Well, we talked. Well, they used him to push the agenda for, I think that was the episode on Opportunity Zones, which is another term. Listen to this headline. New York Times. Why New York State insists that Penn Station area is blighted. The congested, chaotic section of Manhattan near Pennsylvania Station, which teems with tourists, commuters, and shoppers, is

1:48:51 undeniably drab. Does that make it blighted? Yeah, and that's where they came up with $7 billion to renovate it. And can I ask you this question? Because you just made me think of something I didn't even think when I was putting the show together. Could this illegal immigration be used as a artificial blight? Because when you see the pictures, look at how it makes the city look. Oh, yeah, it looks blighted. Blighted AF. Yeah, let's move the people to this area and where we want blight to be.

1:49:34 It's blight on wheels. You know, it's just everywhere. Mobile blight. Wow. I never thought about that till you said that. That's the first thing that popped in my head was the images from the illegal aliens in New York and Chicago and what they're actually doing to these cities. They're blighting it. Yeah. Which, where are they sending them? To the black neighborhood. Chicago was known for not, Chicagoans were known for not wanting to sell. They're like, no, we're not selling our, we're not selling our family homes. South Shore. Yeah. Well, let's send you some blight. Yeah. Some good old blight over your way.

1:50:18 And now, yeah, you tore your community down and we can use eminent domain to take it. Wow. Yeah. I'm just saying. It just seems too handsome. It just seems too convenient. Wow. Well, that's ambiguous. Let's go. We're still standing on there. And this is used in a political, in a political way. This is Australia and the relationship to Taiwan. Welcome back to the program. Let's go live to Paul Kelly, editor-at-large at the Australian Paul National Security Front and Center today via a speech from Penny Wong saying Peter Dutton's been amping up the prospect of war with a superpower.

1:51:01 Mr. Dutton's retort, he says that it's nonsense and that Penny Wong's comments could have been made by Paul Keating. What do you make of where this has landed this afternoon? Look, what we've got to do in this country is just cool down, calm down in terms of this debate we're having at the moment about Taiwan. We need to maintain the current policy. We need to maintain strategic ambiguity as the approach to this issue, which has been the approach for many decades now. And we need to, I think, have both sides using careful language in what's going to be a very brutal, in what's going to be a very brutal and contested election campaign where national security will be an issue.

1:51:48 We've got to ensure this doesn't get out of control. That was a good use of the term there. And that term could be interpreted as gaslighting. You look at the definition of gaslighting, making someone question their reality, perception, or by denying facts. What is that? That's amazing. Policy. Law and politics. It's all ambiguous. It's contagious. Ambivalent. Yes. Contagious. Yes, right. So another chat. I mean, Chat GPT is rolling here. If you want to confuse people, now we go to the shifting goalpost, the final

1:52:34 one. And confusing people, and just so people know who this is, this is Majit Karu Ropia. I think it's how you pronounce this. She's an Indian lady. And she's a narcissistic abuse recovery therapist and also, more importantly, a podcaster. Oh, there you go. Yes. An authority on the subject. Okay. This is the shifting goalpost. A narcissist will ensure you never reach the end of the goalpost. They only have one strategy in mind, and that is to ensure that they win, that you lose or they destroy your victory. A narcissist. narcissist will state or hint about something that they want. Once you have given them what you want and you have scored that goal, they let you know that it was not enough or not what they wanted.

1:53:19 It is very confusing, but this is done to create confusion. A narcissist will move the goalpost because they do not want you to be successful in anything. They will shift things around so you end up failing. This gives them validation that they are better than you and that you are the problem. A narcissist will want you to second guess. You are not allowed to ask anything without being devalued and gaslighted. They want you to be confused and question your sanity, and asking questions is not allowed. This allows them to insert whichever narrative they choose and move the goalpost in any direction. So you never succeed. Wow. First of all, Najeek, give me a call and I'll help you on the audio.

1:54:03 2.0 as well. Really? Oh, okay. Good for her. Needs a little help. No, I mean, you can help her with it. Oh, yeah. She definitely needs that. Yeah. But she said in that clip, they prevent your success. Narcissists aim to win, make you lose, and ruin your achievements. Yeah. That's their goal. It sounds spot on with the system. Sure does. And it seems like this shifting goalpost is the go-to tactic of narcissists, which is another term that for politician.

1:54:43 Or just the amount of times it's used and also used incorrectly. You know, anything that somebody doesn't like, oh, you're a narcissist. Now, would you call 445 Savage a narcissist? That's look at the manipulate to win at your expense. Shift the goalpost. Ensure failure, manipulates, disallowing questions. No, it doesn't hit them all. No. Depends on who's listening. They're probably a better diagnosis than narcissists for him. Yeah. But that's what they call him all the time.

1:55:28 Yeah, I think he likes to win. I mean, he likes to win and know that he's defeating you. I think there's a certain narcissistic quality there. Well, I think with a narcissist, it's a certain vagueness to it. They like to be hidden, it's a hidden thing. I think he likes to dominate and he likes to know that you're being dominated. Right. That's why I wouldn't use, like I said, there's a diagnosis for him, but I don't think that's the one that fits for him because of the nature that he likes to win.

1:56:06 Right. So let's go ahead and get to the second clip for her. They will accuse you of not listening when you do not meet the unachievable goal. They can then claim that they never wanted you to do that in the first place. They do not just adjust the position of the goalpost. They remove it completely. If you achieve the goal, you will be accused of being selfish and it's not what they wanted. Narcissists change their mind and shift the goal because they simply want you to keep on serving them. You have to understand that narcissists are very fickle and change their mind. They will just laugh it off as you fail every goal. You will be accused of being too sensitive or taking things too seriously. When they shift the goal, it's all about them.

1:56:49 They will do whatever it takes to get what they want, even if it means moving the goalpost or cheating in some other way. Yeah, flipping the script on you, all of that. Yep. Now, with that said, if they're calling him a narcissist, maybe that's why they're using the tactics that they're using. Because they're narcissists. Right. Can you hear one time in Dutch for me? But you see, I'm going to learn how to say that one day. I'm going to surprise you. Break it out. But I think that's what's going on there. And like I said, he has his whole host of problems that he has with him, but I don't think that's, I don't think the

1:57:34 hidden aspect of it, he's more out up in front with it, which is why I think in a weird way, people appreciate him. Like, we're going to get the oil. You know, if we're coming to fight, we will oil back. That kind of thing. Right, right, right. If we're going to kill somebody, we're getting the oil. Yeah. We blew him up. That kind of thing. It's not like neutralized. He died like a dog. That kind of thing. That's why I would say. that's why I would say he doesn't fit that diagnosis. But this is PBS, Digital Studios.

1:58:13 And they're going to, in a debate format, they're going to explain, well, using in a debate format, they're going to explain moving the goalposts. Moving the goalposts, sometimes called raising the bar, is a fallacy where the win condition for an opposing argument is constantly revised in response to its successes. Picture a soccer game. A player has the ball and is rushing towards the goal. There are no defenders in sight. The field is wide open. Just as the player is about to kick and score, two opponents pop up out of nowhere and literally move the goal out of the way of the ball. Let's have another gig and let the mix. Effectively, in the face of defeat, the defending side changes the very nature of the game being played.

1:58:53 In conversation, it looks something like this. Mike and Stromike are talking about climate change. Things aren't too bad right now. I'll be worried when there is a clear difference in the climate. Things are bad right now. We have ice cores and tree rings. We know clearly that the climate hasn't been this bad for as long as humans have been around. Those are indirect measurements. You are making a leap of faith. What about all of those written climate records from around the world going back 150 years? 150 years is nothing. Show me written climate records going back a few thousand years and then maybe I will change my tune. A common conclusion to this type of argument is the movement of goalposts outside the arena to a place where the opposing side simply cannot score.

1:59:40 I would have used this example for climate change. The goalpost was weather's not climate. Extreme weather events. That was a big moving of the goalpost. Or global warming to climate change. Yes. Oh, yeah. I found it fascinating that he did that with the climate change thing. He used it the other way around, though. He said, oh, you want thousands of years? No, no, no, no, no. It's 150 years. But then they say it's the worst in history. Yeah. Well, history goes back further than 150 years. That's great. I know.

2:00:18 So I'm just saying on both sides, we're hearing the wizardry of manipulation and moving the goalpost. Yeah. Oh, you know, one saying, well, we need a thousand years asking for something that doesn't exist. And the other side is saying, changing one, the terminology. We went from global warming to climate change, whatever that means. And then you're saying it's the worst thing. Well, you framed it and it's the worst in history. Are you saying recorded history? They never say that's the vagueness. Now we got the vagueness coming in. They don't say in recorded in the 150 years of recorded history, we're the worst. Because most people say, well, it's only 150 years. I mean, the earth has been around for

2:01:00 hundreds of years. Right. That's another good one. They will never say that. They will say worst in history, which is vague. Very. At best. At best. So, but, well, we're going back to nearly fully now. Okay. And it doesn't matter if you're wrong or right. Oh. Well, white supremacy is racism. Now, some people will argue these points. In fact, they will argue the points with everything that I'm saying. But somebody thought up a system based on the old royalist system. Royalism means holier than Tao. Means I'm better than you.

2:01:41 Why are you better than me? Well, that's just the way it is. And because I said so, that's why I'm better than you. Okay, so you're better than me. Now, what do we do next? Well, what we do next is that you let me tell you what to do, and you don't ever tell me anything. You can suggest to me what I should do, and I'll think about it. If I want to do it, I will. But when I tell you something, it's not a suggestion. It's a demand. And you will obey the demands and commands that I make to you. That's the royalist system. Being born with the silver spoon in your mouth.

2:02:21 Yeah. Yeah. Well, that actually exists still, of course. And that's the royalist system. And that's it doesn't matter if we were wrong. It doesn't matter if we were wrong about COVID. And that's more on the left-hand side. We don't matter if we were wrong about Iraq. That's more on the right-hand side. It's the same thing. It doesn't matter if we were wrong. Right. And then it'll go as far as why are you bringing up old stuff. That's the narcissist. That's the narcissism kicking in. In Holland, we say, how can Auder Kuya out the slot? Which means, why are you dragging an old cow out of the canal? It happened yesterday. Is that cow dead? It happened an hour ago.

2:03:03 You just did it. You know, you just slapped me. It's like, well, you're bringing up old stuff. And that's the manipulation of this system. And the system is based off of royalism. What they did was, instead of just having bloodline or heredity, a direct line to a certain bloodline, they opened it up to a certain phenotype. That's white supremacy right, which I call racism nepotism. Yeah, it's just another form of nepotism. Yeah, I mean, we did have two Bush presidents. We did have a Clinton president and an almost second Clinton president.

2:03:46 And then we had a Bush that was supposed to run against a Clinton. Yep. Yeah, I feel like all wrapped up. Yep. Failed. Jeb. Low energy Jeb. Yeah. So this is the royal system. He goes further in number 30. Doesn't make any difference whether you're drunk or sober. You're royal. Doesn't have anything to do with whether or not you are well educated or not. You are royal. You are born royal. You are born better than everybody else. Even when you're not better than everybody else, you're still better than everybody else.

2:04:24 That's the royalist idea. That a lot of people have resisted that idea, and a lot of people have embraced it. But a lot of people down through the ages have resisted the idea of royalism. That there are some people that are just born royal, and that's just no question about it. You can't say anything about it. Now, the idea of racism is based on the same basic principle. That's all it is. It's just a royalist system put on a what? On a color basis. Meaning, you point to a person if you are classified or you have classified yourself as non-white.

2:05:05 Then you point out someone who is classified as non-white if you are classified as white. And you say, oh, there's a person with color in his or her skin. Black, brown, red, yellow, age, tan, color. Doesn't make any difference what color, as long as long as color. And who came up with this color system in the first place? Let me guess. Color people? No, just think about it. You got the red man, the yellow man, you know, the black man, the brown man. Stevie Wonder. He sang about it. Yeah, it was Stevie's song. Yeah, just think about it, though.

2:05:46 You have I'm brown, but I'm not brown. I'm black in the color system. Oh, of course. Of course. But the brown man could be darker than me, but I can't be brown. Yeah. See how confusing? See the built-in confusion that it is? It is, yes. And where I realized that was when you start working in international settings of people from all over the world, which I'm saying, the last company I worked at, it was one of those situations. It was people that were more melanated than me. But they were, I guess, there were kids that are yellow. I mean, this brown thing is confusing too, because brown could be Indian or brown could be Latino or Latina.

2:06:36 But then I can't be brown. And I'm lighter than all of them. It's like, how do we doing this in a color crazy like a spectrum? Y'all should be black and I should be brown or whatever. You know, if they're darkened me or if they're lighter than me. Well, the problem is we don't call it out. I mean, this is, and this is the most bothersome. It's like Kamala Harris. When they call her a black woman, it's like, what do you mean? Are you trying to say Ados because she's not? But no one calls it out. At least not loud enough. It doesn't become a thing. And you're slapped down as racist. But, you know, they try to paint her as an African-American woman.

2:07:19 Yes. Which is just not. Which is gaslighting. Now we're going back to the is meant. And this is one of the things I wanted to stress. I've mentioned it a couple of times in the show. Do not underestimate the ability of these people on the left-hand side. They're not dumb. No. The dumb that they're portraying is a gaslighting mechanism. So you either want to underestimate them or you just get frustrated and you pull your hair out. They're not dumb. You don't get that far. And that's the whole thing with DEI, which, yeah, there are some dumb people that were allowed to have positions.

2:08:03 And we're going to get that to a little later in the show. But these people are not dumb when they come. That binder is a manipulation tactic. I don't know. I need to go check. Like, you didn't prepare. You're on the biggest stage. You didn't prepare to do. No, they know it's that blonde wig by Joy Ann Reed. And it goes on both sides. It's on both sides. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And it's just, oh, I didn't know, like what they said, the term dog whistles. You knew that was a dog whistle. You know what you meant when you implied that. Don't give me that. Oh, I didn't know. You know, I didn't know you were going to take it that way.

2:08:48 So, what I'm just saying is, this is the creation of the system that is. And we've all become so immune to it. Not immune, but just, you know, we don't recognize it anymore. It's just how it is. It's how the system runs. I would even say we become compliant. There you go. And one thing I'll bring up is that the system takes all sides of the argument. It's like, whatever, you know. Yeah. It's like, whatever. Going back. Now, I hate to go here, but the Middle East. They're sending aid to both sides.

2:09:28 And I saw a Ron Paul clip was like, why don't we stop sending money to both sides? That would be the smart thing. But no. I know. It's crazy. Aid to Israel for the bombs, aid to Gaza for the food. Here you go. Yeah. And then aid, I mean, it's not only, because I just like to be fair, also aid to all the Arab nations surrounding Israel. See, they don't aid Gaza because that would be too, you know, and Hamas, that would be too blatant. Europe just sent $7 billion to Egypt. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Okay. Who won't let the people in Gaza into Egypt? Yeah, here's $7 billion. Good job.

2:10:12 How confusing is that? Yeah, good job. And especially in the time of headline readers and memes and 10-second engagement. That's it. All right. Let's go ahead and get to this final clip of It Doesn't Matter. But the person who is white will point out the person who is not white. Beyond the goes a person of color. That means that person can be mistreated by me. Who says so? Oh, the system says so. Because I am royal. If you're royal, why? Because I am white. And that person has color in his or her skin.

2:10:52 I'm looking at them. And I'm going to get closer and make sure that that person has color. If that person has black, brown, red, beige, tan, yellow, whatever, some classification that has color, that person is eligible automatically to be dominated and mistreated by me 24-7 in all areas of activity anytime I choose to mistreat that person. And no one, no one is supposed to say anything about it.

2:11:32 It's my choice and mine alone. That's what white supremacy is. Somebody thought of that idea that took off and became the strongest and most powerful political and religious idea ever thought of in the history of the people of this planet. And it still is. So I'm going to ask you, since I can already hear people yelling at their podcast player, but what about Barack Obama, Mo? What do you mean, but what about him? Well, was he controlled then? Wasn't he the president? Of course. You don't get to that. He was skull and bones. That's right. Just by that, just by that alone.

2:12:16 I mean, you factor out the skin tone. Just by that alone, he was controlled because he had to land that casket and give up his secrets. And they had the ultimate leverage on him, whatever they, they're doing drips of it now, of what he like, what his, his proclivities are. And also on top of that, he was manipulated in a way of every time he needed to vote a certain way, it was some random person running up in the White House or in the elevator with him with a handgun. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yeah, and Hillary Clinton let him know. Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. Robert F. Kennedy got his, you said it got popped.

2:12:59 I ain't dropping out the race. That was a quote-unquote dog whistle. Yeah. Come on. Yeah. And he knew it. But they, but they had him every single bush. We covered that too. They had him since the little boy. Yeah. So, yeah, he was controlled opposition. All right. But with that said, let's quiet. Let's take some more people while we got power. Here we do. I like brand new money. I just, I don't want any money around me. It's not. I'd almost rather have a new one than an old 20. That's kind of dumb. But there's something about new money that excites you. You like $100 bills? Oh, yeah. I like old money too.

2:13:41 Oh, most beautiful thing on earth is a $100 bill. I haven't seen a woman as good looking as a $100 bill. There's something about $100 bill that excites you. Yeah, we love that fresh new money. And we have some more people to thank as we go through the rest of our PayPal and Cash App donations and the people who came in on Podcasting 2.0, which is not to be underestimated. We appreciate all of it. Let's see. We've got Carl Falk there, 5480. We have Anonymous Neil from Elm City, North Carolina, $40, as he says, for services rendered. Thank you. Alex G, 3333. No note. We appreciate you, Alex G. Benjamin Bateman, 3333.

2:14:24 He says, Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, and soul, and love your neighbor as yourself. Three things are accomplished here: respect for our Creator, love for every human being, because we are all neighbors on this planet. And most overlooked aspect of that quote is loving your neighbor as yourself. You have to love yourself. You have to have love for yourself. Then you can love your neighbor. Keep up the good work, gentlemen. Thank you for the reminder, Benjamin. We appreciate it. George Godfrey, 3333. Shout out from San Antonio. Put down the rainstick, Adam. Well, I'm not sure when you sent it, but I haven't used the rainstick in a while. We might have to, though, if we don't get some rain soon. G. McDonald, 33. Thank you. Aaron Smith, 25.

2:15:05 Thank you for your perspective and your ability to pierce through the propaganda. You have a way of explaining your take on things with clarity and wisdom, and that is truly inspiring. Sam Smock, 2345 or 2345. Is Michelle 24 just a setup to leave her holding the bag? Well, that would be Big Mike 2024. She said it's a no-go. So I guess not. I tried to get Big Mike 2028. Somebody already had it. So who knows? Yeah. Now, a whole bunch of 20s with no notes. So I'll thank these people. Aaron Sneed, Bo Baldwin, Benjamin Barlow, David I. McNally, David Jones, Dustin Zimmer, Kyle Tack, Michael Talbot, Tom Starkweather.

2:15:49 Hello, Tom. Melodious Owls, Vanessa Steinbach, and Young Gump Productions. Young Grump. Young Grump, I'm sorry. Young Grump. Yeah, we know Young Grump. I'm sorry. $14.74 from Mark Asher, Christy Carlton with $10, and Daryl Johnson with $10. And we have Gene Morancy, I think. $10. Note is one to be the first to donate on today's episode. We're still waiting on the second episode of your new interactive show. Tell Miguel in the chats to match me. And she was the first to donate on the show. Okay. Thank you very much. Joshua Goodson, $10.

2:16:30 Melissa Ebide, Ebid, Ebide, $10. Then two, $10 from SV. Thank you very much. Robin Tolbert, $9.99, episode 37. Sister-in-law, Gobsmack Me to Listen to You. Been spreading the word ever since. Thank you for all your hard work and gathering facts and patiently presenting them in fascinating ways. That's a nice compliment. And there, of course, is Terry the Human Subscription Keller with his typical 411. No note, but we see you and we hear you, Terry. An occult fan, 333. Shout out, Joey J, your brother, Nathan Lee. Ah, yes, Nathan Lee is in Massachusetts. Then from Podcasting 2.0, this is really the way that you need to support all of your favorite podcasts.

2:17:12 This is non-deplatformable podcasting, non-de-platformable value that you can provide back right from your app. We already thanked Anonymous with his 100,000 sats, 61,200 from Phil Calvin, who says therapeutic indeed. 54321, 54,321 from Todd from Northern Virginia, checking in on Podverse. I don't think I could provide enough sats to match the value I received over these 100 episodes. Thanks, Mo. Well, no, you did. If that's what you've got, then that is the value, and that's the top, and we appreciate it. it. Eric PP, big developer in the podcasting 2.0 space, 33,333. Checking in from CurioCaster. Gene Everett, 33,333.

2:17:56 Dude, on Fountain, he says, I was saying as I hit play, we need a potluck before this thing is over. I just had a feeling. Love you, Mo. Adam, you too. No homo. All right. Merlin, 25,082. Thank you, Merlin. 10,000 from Friend Dizzy or Fry Dizzy. Fry Dizzy. Great show, gentlemen. So much information the world needs to hear. Keep doing what you're doing. 10,000 from D's Laughs. Oh, yes. D's laughs does those mix. Value for value. Thanks again, Mo, for another banger. Match Homie on the out. Mach Homie on the outro. Yeah, Mach Homie. Mock homie? What does that mean? Yeah, Mach Homie. That was self-care. Oh, oh, oh, oh.

2:18:37 Self-love, excuse me, self-love. Gotcha. A couple of boob donations, all from Ace Ackerman. That's 8,008 sats V4V, episode 31, 30, and 28. Then user 44516880, change it on Fountain. Hello from F6. Wish I could have met you before you left. We're not gone yet. Another boob from Ace Ackerman for episode 27. And then that guy checks in with 8008. Boobs, rub with coconut oil and caress them for good luck and a better future. The best idea ever, according to the sources close to the conversation. Episode 100 donation idea. PhD in black history from Mo Facts University. Valued at over $3,333.

2:19:20 Get yours today for only a microscopic value of $49.99. We can get some pennies from the penny jar to go around it up to 500. Love is lit. That's a lot of work, man. It's a lot of work to fulfill that. Ace Ackerman with a boob for episode 96. Then we get our 5,000s from Parsley, who also comes in with, oh, there's Perky K9 with 3333. You both have been a blessing and an example for all. Thank you. We have Trail Chicken. Great show. Thank you. One else get teary-eyed with the bro love 3333. Bear Snare on Podcast Guru. Awesome show as always.

2:20:01 Mo's perspective is always unique and enriching. That's a row of sticks, 1111. Same for Joel W, 500 from The Anonymous. From Bescher, 500, 420. We see you. From Yegro, still don't agree words are violence just because they can elicit emotion. Maybe words can result in violence, but the ads not themselves violent. Actions can be violent. Thank you, Casey, for your 400, 196 from user 42334955. Change that on Fountain. 96 down. Four to go. Teary-eyed emojis. And then thank you for some qualk with your 11, with your 111s and Fit Means Above with your 100 and both of those for Fit Means Above 100.

2:20:44 Wow. Thank you all so much. Go to podcasting2.org to learn more about Podcasting 2.0. And of course, if you want to pick up a modern podcast app, you'll find them right there. Or you can go. Here's an easy way to remember, podcastapps.com. And to support the MoFax show for the next three episodes and who knows where it will go, go to mofax.com directly to the donation site, MoFundMe, M-O-E-F-U-N-D-M-E dot com. Thank you all for supporting episode number 97. All right. So the next six clips we've covered before, but this is the booster. Yeah, here. Roll up your sleeves. Roll up your sleeves, everybody. And we have to do this because,

2:21:29 and I debated on doing, I had two shows. The last three are shows are set in stone. Okay. So this one was a, do you do a booster or do you do I do something, you know, another topic that I always wanted to cover, but I mean, I found this one to be more important because the manipulation is at an all-time high. The confusion is at an all-time high. So we have to revisit the six strategies of confusion by Neely Fuller. And they're very similar to what the chat GPT gave us. Let's go ahead and get into number one. No, these are six things that they do for confusion.

2:22:10 As far as I know, it's six and major things. They might do a number of small things, I mean, that I haven't recognized to cause confusion. But it's six basic things. Now, this is not in the textbook. I've been talking about it for years, and I intend to put it in an updated, expanded version of the textbook. But it's racial classification confusion. Now, you got a little bit more of that going on now with some recent incident of a white lady saying. saying that she was black. That's racial classification confusion. Okay. All right. And they even have classification confusion. Where the people who are sometimes considered to be white

2:22:53 or sometimes said or implied that maybe they are not white or vice versa. Whatever's convenient for them. Yes, sir. That's what they'll do. Well, we've talked about a number of those. The orange is the main one. Yep. I keep stressing this. Non-white. Yeah, that's important. Why do they call you orange? Nobody, it's going over people's heads. Why are they referring to you as a color? Think about it. That's right. You're out of the group now.

2:23:34 You're out of the umbrella of the system. Why? They don't even like people like Morning Joe, who do this all the time. I don't think they even know why they're doing it. It's just done. That's just how you do it. They've been programmed. They've been programmed. And honestly, I didn't come into knowing it, but it just dawned on me one day: like, oh, they're demoting people. Yes. You don't meet the, I told you, if you shut up, ate your beef, and just didn't say anything, you would be fine.

2:24:16 But when you want to push back against the system and, you know, and say you have, you know, ways of protecting yourself, we know, I'm GBG, so we know we're on the same page. That's right. Or you two genders or whatever it is. And the other one is, oh, your God ain't science. Oh, that's a big offense. Oh, that's a big offense because notice when the rubber met the road, when COVID hit, you can't go to church. That's right. Who was the real God? That was the testing point right there. It's discussed every day in churches around America to this day.

2:25:00 And a lot of churches broke, Mo. They broke. They're all sparkle now. Because they don't want to lose that protection. And part of that protection is the 511c3. That's right. The Johnson Amendment. This is the thing that they're very good at. And it was illustrated in the diary of an economic hitman. Is they integrate into your system so much. You use the API analogy. You become so integrated into the system that you can't function without it. And that's why Podcast in 2.0 is such a huge, and I'm not, you know, I'm not being a homer here.

2:25:44 The fact that you can get your message out and people can get value back to you to keep you going. That the system don't like that. Because they had it all sold up. Don't turn your power off. Yeah. We experienced that. But this racial classification confusion. And this is why transracial will never be a thing. Because if it is, I could easily identify I'm transracial. I'm white now. Right, right. Give me those privileges. Right. Or give me that, not even privileges because that's what they give non-white people is white privilege. You know, you're quote unquote under a system white supremacy.

2:26:28 You're born with those rights. They ain't given to you. But if you, like I said, if you don't want to go along with their system, they will take it away from you. And that's why trans racism will never be a thing. And that's why if you, I'm just going to make this one last point. A person can have seven white grandparents and one black grandparent. And as soon as that black grandparent is unearthed, done. What are you? What do they start calling you? I don't make the rules. I'm just telling you, I'm just showing you how they go about this thing. Or if you have four grandparents and three of them

2:27:14 are white and one is black. Or if you have two parents and one is black and one is white, I should be equally to choose, you know, what I want to be, right? I mean, if we were talking equally, if I want to identify with my white parents. No, you're tainted now. No. Right. Now, now you can call yourself black. That's fine. That's okay. But you can't go the other way. And I didn't make these rules. I didn't make this up. So I'm just showing you how the system works. Now, anything you want to add before we go to number two? No, I'm good. All right, number two. Second, racial dislocation confusion. Now, they have had this all the time, meaning keep those squatters moving.

2:27:59 In other words, if people are non-white, keep them moving. Why? They have found out from experiments, from experience. You keep people moving all the time. People's everything from people going across the desert trying to find a way to get some food, some clothing, some shelter, some jobs, or people trying to cross an ocean and their babies falling into the water and whatnot and turning over. That's dislocated people. They are not stable. They're trying to find a place where they can go where no one is trying to harm them. Right. Okay. Also, dislocation means you have your thing sitting out on the sidewalk.

2:28:42 Okay. All right. Now, you might have done that about three years before then. See, the white supremacist when it comes to black people, keep those black people moving. Keep them moving. Yeah. Well, we're seeing that in real time. And that's what you were saying about the powder keg that's going on in New York and Chicago. You're saying more specifically. Yeah. Keep them moving. And Chicago had its own internal issues when they compressed a lot of the neighborhoods into a small area. This is why the gang violence really sparked up like it did because you used to be cross-town beef.

2:29:22 Now you're cross the block or down the street from your quote from your ops, as they like to call it. Your opposition. Now you're bringing people here from other countries. Just exacerbating it all. And for people that don't think skin color counts, the Haitians are the number one people that have the best claim of asylum. But look how they're treated when they get to the border. Yeah. They don't get envelopes of cash and new clothes. They got it for a moment there with the earthquake, but after that, nope. Nope.

2:30:03 I'm talking about recently under this new administration. No, I know barbecue. Barbecue. Why? And that's the new county. Yeah. That's a good point. Instantly. Yeah, that's a good point. And I made the post that Hispaniola is the new Korea. They got a wall going right down the middle of it. That's right. That's right. Keep our eye on it. Because there's some precious rare earth minerals that may or may not be in Haiti. And gold. Yeah. You know, who has the 26-year contract? I do. And natural gas and oil.

2:30:43 And it's plentiful. It's all rotten. Hillary's brother has the gold contracts. Right. But why is it that lighter brown people and yellow people are treated? Come on in. But the black people, oh no, you might be a cannibal. You might. Yeah, I see it. I see it. Yeah, roast me. But color don't count. And the whole thing is bull. That cannibal picture was from five years ago. That video. That's bull and it's bold. It is. And the barbecue thing is also bull. That's not true. That's his nickname since he was a kid. His mama had

2:31:27 like a truck, a food truck. Well, it's easy to believe the savages eat people. There you go. Going back to Tarzan. Oh, what do you mean? The cartoons from the 40s, from the 30s. Yes. Oh, yeah. They're leaning heavy and all, but nobody sees it. And you know what? Jean-Paul Pierre. Yeah. Haitian. Yes. Is she saying anything? No. Because she doesn't want to lose her white privilege. That's why she doesn't say anything. Wow. This is why I said this show is necessary because it's all up in your face. As people will say, right there in your face. Yeah. Don't want to see it, though.

2:32:12 No, of course not. Number three. The third thing is racial population tailoring confusion. In other words, don't let the population in any particular place get too big. It becomes difficult to handle. So you tailor it, huh? Yeah, so you tailor that population. You have all. all kinds of ways you spread disease. Okay. All right. That's one way of getting rid of some people. Yeah. Like you mold them. Right. Or you just hand out guns to 50% of the population and you don't give the other 50% any guns. Okay. Or you give them all guns and let them go after them. So you make sure that you tailor their minds so that they're mad at each other.

2:32:54 They're gangsters and all like that. I want to be a gangster. Okay. Now, when you get to be a gangster and get your credentials, who are you going to gangster against? Yeah, street. Well, the black people. That's all I ever see you do. Yeah. All right. So, you know, big deal. That's all a part of the racist scheme. Oh, man. He's a prophet. Hey. That's logic. Yeah. That's cold. How are we? You use logic. Yeah. It makes you seem like you're from the future. Yeah. Because you notice the trend. Oh, I've seen that pattern before. Of course. Of course. You can see it.

2:33:34 Yeah. And I'll make one last point before we move on to four. Where'd all the hot shots go? To red states full of orange people. Yeah. Where did the trains overturn that? Putting poison into the water and the soil. Yeah. Where the orange people are. And I'm going to make because this is part of the show I was going to make. Where are all the nuclear silos at? Or an orange country. So if there ever was a nuclear war, who's going to be taken out? Orange. Yeah. You've been demoted, folks.

2:34:16 This is why we go first. Yes. We go first. But with the advent of AI and all these other tools, it's the small, well, I say the two groups: more people and less people. The less people are like, we don't need all these people around. Who's the first to go? Well, the blacks are on the bottom. They stay on the bottom. We don't want to mess with them. Unbelievable. So let's replace the orange. Yeah. The replacement theory is real. It's really real. Now you can call me a white folks of black people. No, it's interesting because you have an actual document

2:35:00 which is replacing replacement migration. That's part of what really has been happening. But this is replacement theory. It's something different. It happens under the same banner, but you don't have to be an immigrant to be a part of it. It's amazing. Keep those people moving. Yes, keep them moving. That's right. Wow. Number four. Number four is racial sexual confusion. Wow. So now you got trans this and trans that and trans that.

2:35:37 Then you mix that transgender confusion with trans racial confusion. Now you got the package that you was aiming for in the beginning. Yeah. I mean, they started off with transgender, but I've been telling people for years, oh, yeah, that looks like that's mundane. That's, you know, we all have people who are, you know, what you call bisexual or trisexual, even among black people. We all got them in our family. If we are not those ourselves, okay? So we say, well, that's no big deal, but you got to think about what the racists intend to do with that. So they mix the transgender with the transracial. Now they got maximum confusion, which is what they want.

2:36:22 Right. Okay. Wow. Wow. 1972 was when he said they have black men in dresses. Yeah. 1972 is when he called it. And look where we're at now. And Harry Styles is right behind us. All the other people. Oh, man. It's unbelievable. No, it's actually very believable. What am I saying? And what is that to do? I've said it before, and I'll say it again before we move to five. To eliminate the undesirables before they procreate. Oh, yeah. Say it again. Totally. Totally. To eliminate the undesirables before they procreate.

2:37:07 That's why they want your kid on hormone blockers at four, five, six, seven years old. Because if you're dumb enough to give it to your children, allow your children to have it, you're not one of the smartest people. That's right. That's right. You're not a master. You don't deserve to be a master. master. It's off-brand. Get rid of them. Trying to tell you. This ain't no game. This ain't no theory. It's right in your face. Yeah. Number five. You go to number five: racial showcasing confusion.

2:37:46 What's that? That's putting a few black people, all black faces that used to be to the back. We want them down front now. Okay. Put our black faces down front on a whole bunch of stuff that the white supremacists are going to be doing in the back. But you have a black face up front. Now that makes black people get mad at the black people who are up front. Right. Right. But it's the white supremacists who are back behind her. Orchestrating the whole thing. Yeah. Yeah. So that causes confusion. And it also causes black people to start attacking each other. And the races are back behind the wall, just cracking their sides, laughing. Say, we got them again.

2:38:26 I mean, these people are the dumbest creatures you'll ever see because they can't catch on to nothing. All right. Oh, yeah, yo, yo, yo, yi. Run down the list right quick. Who's in charge of the border? Kamala Harris. Boom. Who's in charge in the military? Lloyd Austin. Okay. Who's on that third term? Barack Obama. Who's coming after Trump? You just go out and list on that one. Yeah, really. Joy Reed. Finally Willis. Yeah. What's the New York

2:39:14 DA? I forget her name. It's all right. Who's the face of the racial population movement? The mayor of DC, the mayor of New York. Yeah. And the mayor of Chicago. Yeah. And we also have the mayor of DC. Yeah. She's going to be the face of the Crime Bill 2.0. That's right. Yeah. Because they just put that in. They put that into the DC law, right? Yeah. Oh, man. That's amazing.

2:39:51 DEI. I knew what DEI was. Oh, yeah. I wrote it out. Well, I mean, Boeing's problems, United Airlines' problems, all going to be, it's the trans the trans CEO of United. And I'm just going to presume that we'll find some colored people to blame for Boeing's problems. But it'll be, it's already, it's already working. People are already saying, oh, yeah, there's Boeing, DEI, oh, there's United, DEI. And DEI just might as well be a term for black. And this is the second cycle of the military thing because who had it first? Colin Powell. Who took all the blame for the Middle East? Colin Powell. Colin Powell.

2:40:36 That's right. So that's why. No, I'm saying that you recognize the patterns. Yeah. Do you know what's coming out of the pipe? Yeah. Blame. Want no parts of it. I don't want. That's probably why. What's that? Lloyd Dale's or whatever his name is. Yeah. I was sick. I called in that day. He knew what was going on. Wait a minute, who's this? Lloyd Austin. It's good. Lloyd Austin. Yes, I was sick. I don't want to. He wised up what was going on. I wasn't there. I was in the hospital. Good point. The Supreme Court. Who's on there? If it's on the right, it's Clarence Thomas. Is it on the left?

2:41:19 Yeah. Wow. Sodomiera in there as well. She's not white. She's a little colored. You know, let's go for it. Wow. This plant maximum confusion. Unbelievable. When you summon, and Eric Adams going down, and they're all going down. They're all going down. In California, the mayor, wasn't it? London Breed or whatever her name was. San Francisco. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. What is what is I gotta I gotta know her name now. Put them out front. Why you look it up?

2:42:01 Put it out front. Put them out front. What is that woman's name now? The Manhattan DA. What's her name? What is her name? People are, again, people are yelling at their podcast device. Attorney, is she Attorney General? Yeah. Let's see. I think she's. she's attorney general, but we're going to hate ourselves. Letitia James, there we go. That's it. There we go, Letitia James. And you see that coming out of the mayor? It's drip by drip by drip. Oh, he was friends with the bishop. This has got the fans. Now they got another case on them. P. Diddy. You want to go there?

2:42:46 P. Diddy. Don't look at Clive Davis. Look at P. D. Aster. He's an Epstein of Hollywood, please. Please. Yeah, I've been pushing back on that myself. That's crazy. This system existed long before P. Diddy was born. And when it comes time to out the wicked lesbians of the music industry, it's not going to be Taylor Swift who goes down. Oh, no, of course not. It'll be Beyonce. Yeah, because Taylor Swift tapped into the Hunt family. Stay tuned. Stay tuned for that one. Stay tuned for the Hunt family and the campaign.

2:43:24 All right, nice. Nice tease. Yeah. But let's go ahead and go to number six. Okay, then you go to number six: racial white sacrifice confusion. White sacrifice? Yes. Meaning, when you drive down the street and you look out your car window, you see some white people on park benches. You see some white people who are out there barefooted in the winter time. And you see some white people walking around talking to themselves and whatnot and don't have anything. I mean, and you say, oh, this is racism is over because look, if you got white people who are poor, you got white people that don't have anything.

2:44:04 You got white people who are suffering, just like black people. So it's not racism. It must be something else. No, the white supremacists operate on a percentage basis. They know that, and they even put up, they put in position in the path of danger a certain segment of white people. They'll just pick out white people, so to speak, and then throw them under the bus. This is to distract non-white people to thinking that racism doesn't exist. Yes. But they do it on a percentage basis. See, for every 10,000 black people that they kill, they'll kill 10 white people and say, see, you know, it's not about race.

2:44:52 I mean, you know, I mean, people just out here killing people. That's all it is. See, but it's always the black people who are the greatest number of people suffering. That's the way they operate. Who is he talking to there? His co-host, Mr. Bobby. Oh, okay. You got to undepress me from all this move how are we ending up here? Is it just going to go even where it's getting even worse for these last? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. We never leave people on a downer. Good. But I just want to say one thing about the white sacrifice because we talked about the orange. And that's the thing. But they're playing the same trick on you they did with Black Lives Matters and the cop videos and everything else.

2:45:37 The same exact thing. Yeah. The same exact trick. And Jan 6. Hey, look, we're arresting white people. Look how we're doing them. Yeah. We're arresting Christians. Yeah. White Christians. White Christian nationalists. Yeah. Look, we can't be racist. This can't be a system of white supremacy. Would they eat our would we eat ourselves? But it's a numbers game. It's a clean. This is clean up. Hey, sacrificial lambs up for the slaughter. But we ain't going to leave people on a downer because there is a system. There is a way to beat the system. Ah, there we go. Thank goodness. Yeah, this is the booster. Roll up your sleeves. All right. I'm ready. I'm going to go. One for each arm. 39. Remember this. This makes it real simple.

2:46:22 When you talk to anyone and the person is talking about a problem, then you go into the question mode. What is the problem? What are you going to do about the problem? All right. How are you going to go about doing something about the problem? And what do you expect the constructive result to be? Because anybody that you talk to, the main thing that you're looking for is whether the talk that you're having is constructive or non-constructive. And if it's something that you are going to get with the person and do, you want to know if the result is going to be constructive or non-constructive.

2:47:07 It's really very simple. Nothing about counter-racist science, basically. It's complicated because you just keep. keep two things in mind. What is constructive and what is non-constructive? Because you're always supposed to be doing or saying something that's in the constructive lane, never in the non-constructive lane. And how do you know the difference? By asking questions. Asking questions. Okay, you want to break that down? It's so simple that it goes right over your head. Every action you do, ask yourself: is this constructive or non-constructive?

2:47:48 That post you're about to post, that story you're about to share, that food you're about to eat, that medicine you're about to take, the words that you're just about to speak to a person that you talk to. Is it constructive or non-constructive? And if you start doing that in your head, one, it's going to free up a lot of time. Once, and two, you're not going to support the system with your time, talent, or treasure. That's right. And it sounds so stupid. And when you say it, people just look at you. That kind of like justice is like, oh, you know, what? Well,

2:48:30 you want to give people that need the most help, you know, the most constructive help? You don't want to mistreat people. That's stupid. That'll never happen. Yeah, if you think like that, it'll never happen. Yeah, because by doing that, you'll train yourself and you'll start to identify stuff. And it's a simple question. It's not no, I liken it to fasting. Like, I'm not a calorie counter. I can never be a calorie counter. Writing all that stupid stuff down and weighing stuff. I'm on or off. Right. 16 hours off, eight hours on. That's it. It's the same way. Is this behavior I'm doing constructive or non-constructive?

2:49:12 Start asking yourself with everything you do, everything you do. And then lastly, you ask yourself these four questions. Number one, what do I want to do? You should know what you want to do. All right. Yeah. Number two, why do I want to do what I want to do? That's every day, all day long. Why do you want to do what you want to do? Number three, how do I plan to do what I want to do? And number four, and this is what you call the clincher question. Of course, all of the questions are important.

2:49:55 But number four, what do I expect the constructive result to be? If everyone followed those four, there would be no social media. No, it would be, it would be great. Yeah, if everyone did it. Sure. It would be great because you would pick up, say, hey, I want to share some constructive information. Yeah. This is how you change an alternator. Or whatever. I hardly know how I'll say it. Wow. When's the last time you changed the alternator on your car? Who knows? But that will be the social.

2:50:40 That is what it is built for. We are the problem. Yeah, of course. We are the problem. We're in a trap. We're in a trap. And we give these people power. They don't have any power. No. Adam and Eve didn't have to eat the fruit. No. No. No. If they said, hey, is this Apple Eden? It's Apple constructive and non-constructive. If that asked that question, we'll still be in the Garden of Eden right now. That simple. Yeah. Well, we're not. We're in the broken world, and we have to live consciously and think about our actions and what we're doing. Wait, put it on the scale.

2:51:25 There you go. Mo, thank you for this. This was a great booster shot. It's the only booster shot I'll ever take. And I appreciate you. I appreciate your work, brother. This was great. And I appreciate 97 episodes of constructive conversations. That's right. Right. And as I always say, pay attention to everything and the truth will reveal itself. My brother, we will talk again for episode number eight. I look forward to it. All right, Adam. See you later. Okay, brother. Take care. We'll see y'all soon. Bye-bye. I'd rather die

2:52:09 before. I believe all the things my friends tell me, but friends don't lie, I'm told all that shines ain't gold. So I'll live and learn. And for us both, I'll be concerned. Sugar, I'd rather believe this whole world ain't around

2:52:52 what goes up. Don't come down and that everyone's the same in each and every way. And there's no such thing as spring and the birds that love to sing. I won't let myself believe that you're untrue

2:53:31 You could ever betray all my love for you But friends don't lie, I'm told all that shines ain't gold So I'll live and learn And for us both I'll be concerned Oh baby, baby, baby You know I'll slay for you, darling

2:54:11 Girl, I'll work my fingers to the bone Just to make you happy home I don't care about the world