Topic: Information War

4 chapters across the catalog

97: Flowers for Fuller
• 14:49 - 20:31

97: Flowers for Fuller

Neuro-Linguistic Programming and the Power of Conscious Language

A segment from the YouTube channel Memento Mori explores how ancient civilizations viewed words as creative tools capable of shaping reality. Modern neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is identified as a method to rewire the mind, though it is often used for manipulation in the current "information war." The hosts reflect on how intelligence can increase susceptibility to bias and note that their personal social media algorithms are beginning to synchronize.

79: Pizza Party
• 33:43 - 37:52

79: Pizza Party

Joy Reid, Clarence Thomas, and the "Pizza Playbook" Strategy

MSNBC host Joy Reid criticized Republican opposition to Jackson, comparing it to the "Dixiecrats" of the 1960s while labeling Justice Clarence Thomas's wife an insurrectionist. The hosts argue that Republicans utilized a "Pizza Playbook"—referencing the themes of the Pizzagate conspiracy—to attack Jackson's sentencing record regarding child pornography cases without explicitly mentioning the discredited theory.

79: Pizza Party
• 57:15 - 1:02:12

79: Pizza Party

Josh Hawley and the Pedophile Judge Narrative

Senator Josh Hawley questioned Jackson on her sentencing of an 18-year-old offender, highlighting her comments regarding the "collateral consequences" of convictions. The hosts predict that Jackson will be branded as the "pedophile judge" in future political memes, similar to how Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh were labeled during their respective confirmations. They credit the Republican strategy for successfully creating "clippable nuggets" for the midterms.

79: Pizza Party
• 1:05:43 - 1:08:35

79: Pizza Party

Sentencing Discrepancies and the "Peers" Argument

The hosts analyze Jackson's defense of her sentencing record, specifically her response to Josh Hawley regarding whether an 18-year-old and an 8-year-old are "peers." They argue that her failure to definitively extinguish the "peers" argument in the moment allowed for damaging political optics. They emphasize that in the court of public opinion, nuanced legal explanations are often lost to simple, provocative soundbites.