Topic: Malcolm X

87 chapters across the catalog

99: Devil in the Details
• 2:17:41 - 2:23:18

99: Devil in the Details

Malcolm X, Elijah Muhammad and H.L. Hunt

Malcolm X's rift with Elijah Muhammad is linked to H.L. Hunt, who was reportedly the Nation of Islam's biggest benefactor. Hunt also funded the KKK, playing both sides of the racial divide to cause confusion. Malcolm X's "chickens coming home to roost" comment about JFK's death frightened Elijah Muhammad because of the potential exposure of their financial ties to Hunt.

99: Devil in the Details
• 2:33:49 - 2:37:20

99: Devil in the Details

Shaheed Bolson, Gaza and Western Brutality

Shaheed Bolson, a Western convert to Islam, criticizes modern Westerners for watching "genocide in Gaza" on television while eating pizza, comparing them to past generations who held picnics at lynchings. He argues that Western civilization is toxic and gaslit, with a moral compass that has been robbed by degeneracy and hypocrisy.

98: Mixed Up
• 59:05 - 1:05:29

98: Mixed Up

Malcolm X, House Negro versus Field Negro Dynamics

A classic Malcolm X speech is used to explain the historical divide between the "house negro" and the "field negro." The hosts apply this framework to modern structures like the "Bule," where educated black elites are used by the system to keep the masses in check. They link this dynamic back to the Drake and Kendrick Lamar beef, positioning Drake as the "house negro" receiving industry privileges.

98: Mixed Up
• 2:45:04 - 2:54:08

98: Mixed Up

Internalized Racism, White Mothers and Hair Politics

The discussion explores the "hang-ups" of mixed children with white mothers, who may experience internalized racism or feel "not black enough." The hosts touch on the politics of black hair, from the "wig snatching" trend on social media to Colin Kaepernick's adoption of an afro. They suggest that the system uses hair texture as a primary "telltale sign" of blackness.

94: Helping Our People
• 2:20:03 - 2:28:50

94: Helping Our People

Assassinations of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.

The hosts examine the psychological impact of the 1960s assassinations, noting the strategic order in which Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were killed. They play clips of King's reaction to Malcolm's death and the subsequent news reports of King's own murder in 1968. Dr. Cornel West comments on how "something died" in the black community following these events, leading to a shift toward more radicalized anger among the youth.

93: Higher Infinite Power
• 36:27 - 39:55

93: Higher Infinite Power

Cultural Timing and the Commercialization of Music

Mo Facts and Adam Curry discuss how different cultures operate on unique time signatures and rhythms, from Thai hill tribes to South American Samba. They explore "Blue Eyed Soul" and artists like Justin Timberlake or the Rolling Stones who learned from black musical traditions. Mo cites Malcolm X's metaphor about putting too much milk in coffee to describe how mainstream commercialization washes out original cultural expressions.

93: Higher Infinite Power
• 2:30:50 - 2:34:23

93: Higher Infinite Power

Sam Cooke, Malcolm X, and Muhammad Ali Trifecta

Mo Facts discusses the "trifecta" of Sam Cooke, Malcolm X, and Muhammad Ali hanging out together in 1964. This alliance of the heavyweight champion, a civil rights leader, and a pop superstar made the establishment nervous. Mo notes that the "do-for-self" mentality of the Nation of Islam was particularly disruptive to the economic status quo.

92: White Lies
• 32:42 - 38:31

92: White Lies

Malcolm Nance, Orange Jihad and Information Warfare

Malcolm Nance, described as the "Neil deGrasse Tyson of counterintelligence," is featured discussing his book "They Want to Kill Americans." Nance uses the term "Orange Jihad" to describe Trump supporters and domestic militias. Mo Facts compares this rhetoric to the "Black Identity Extremist" label used by the FBI, suggesting the same playbook is being used to criminalize a new segment of the population.

92: White Lies
• 49:15 - 55:01

92: White Lies

Zionist Occupation Government and 1930s Madison Square Garden Rally

Malcolm Nance references the "Zionist Occupation Government" (ZOG) and historical Nazi rallies in the United States, specifically a 1939 event at Madison Square Garden. The hosts compare the current political climate to 1930s Berlin, suggesting that the Democratic Party is adopting authoritarian tactics while accusing their opponents of being Nazis. They discuss the "Friends of New Germany" and the roots of the eugenics movement in America.

89: Mass Confusion
• 1:32:48 - 1:36:05

89: Mass Confusion

Malcolm X on Media and Thought Control

Archival clips of Malcolm X explain how those in power use the press, radio, and television to control the thoughts of the masses. The hosts apply this to modern doctors who are rebranded as "providers" and forced to follow rigid protocols. They discuss the professional consequences for those who dissent, including deplatforming and the loss of medical licenses.

89: Mass Confusion
• 1:40:21 - 1:43:49

89: Mass Confusion

The BIPOC Label and Indigenous Identity

The hosts critique the emergence of the term "BIPOC" (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color), arguing it is a confusing label that dilutes the specific history of American descendants of slavery. They trace the term's rise to the inclusion of Pacific Islanders in minority categories. Malcolm X is quoted regarding the unique status of the "Afro-American" compared to other minority groups.

89: Mass Confusion
• 1:43:49 - 1:46:40

89: Mass Confusion

Poverty of Spirit and Sanctioned Riots

Malcolm X distinguishes between financial poverty and "poverty of spirit" or human dignity. The hosts discuss how modern riots, such as those during the Black Lives Matter movement, are often "sanctioned" or granted the "privilege" to occur because they serve a larger political initiative. They contrast this with organic protests that are met with immediate state suppression.

89: Mass Confusion
• 2:33:11 - 2:39:05

89: Mass Confusion

Malcolm X on Integration and Human Dignity

Archival audio of Malcolm X critiques the goal of integration, arguing that Black Americans should focus on building their own economy and institutions rather than "begging" to participate in white society. The hosts apply this to modern college campuses, questioning why students demand "safe spaces" in environments where they feel unwanted instead of attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).

88: Business Decision
• 52:26 - 57:21

88: Business Decision

Jared Taylor and Malcolm X on Racial Disparities

The debate between nature and nurture regarding racial disparities is examined through the lens of Jared Taylor's genetic arguments and Malcolm X's environmental critiques. Taylor's views on evolutionary differences are contrasted with Malcolm X's assertion that "intellectual sluggishness" in black communities is a direct result of systemic exploitation and the legacy of slavery. The segment explores how these competing ideologies have shaped American social policy for decades.

88: Business Decision
• 1:23:18 - 1:32:48

88: Business Decision

Educational Vetting Systems and the White Savior Complex

A personal anecdote describes the vetting process for "academically gifted" black students in the late 1980s and early 1990s, which the speaker intentionally avoided to remain with his peers. The discussion explores how these programs, along with media figures like Tyler Perry, are used to push specific agendas—such as vaccination or reproductive behaviors—within the black community. The hosts argue that these efforts are often intentional psychological operations designed to maintain control.

88: Business Decision
• 1:32:49 - 1:37:40

88: Business Decision

Malcolm X on Racial Dignity and Open Conversation

Malcolm X's views on the necessity of racial dignity and independent education are highlighted as a model for honest communication between races. He argues that true progress requires both white and black individuals to speak their minds without fear of causing offense. The hosts apply this philosophy to their "value for value" podcast model, emphasizing the importance of independent media in facilitating these difficult conversations.

84: More or Less
• 54:24 - 1:02:10

84: More or Less

Malcolm X on White Liberals and the Deception of Paternalism

A 1960s clip of Malcolm X is played, where he describes white liberals as more deceitful than conservatives, using black Americans as "pawns" in a political game. Mo Facts reflects on his time in corporate America, noting how liberal colleagues often used "tricks" or a "moral high ground" to persuade him. The hosts compare the "white coat" humanitarian approach of American supremacists to the more overt tactics of historical European regimes.

82: High Value Target
• 1:04:17 - 1:08:44

82: High Value Target

Political Shifts and the Black Male Vote

Karen Hunter and Luther "Uncle Luke" Campbell are featured in a discussion about the shifting political allegiances of Black voters. Campbell's questioning of what the Democratic Party has specifically done for Black people is highlighted as a sign of growing dissatisfaction. Hunter expresses a refusal to take political direction from Black male celebrities, preferring the strategic "ballot or the bullet" approach of Malcolm X.

80: Barry's Back
• 57:57 - 1:06:27

80: Barry's Back

Black Twitter Inc vs Organic Communication

The concept of "Black Twitter Inc" is introduced to describe the politically sanitized version of blackness accepted by the tech industry. This version is contrasted with organic black communication found on YouTube, which offers a broader ideological spectrum including views often suppressed by mainstream Twitter algorithms.

77: No Hugs Needed
• 2:14:02 - 2:18:05

77: No Hugs Needed

Malcolm X on the House Negro and Field Negro

A classic clip of Malcolm X describes the difference between the "House Negro," who identifies with the master's interests, and the "Field Negro." The hosts apply this analogy to modern figures like Charlamagne tha God and the Boule, who they argue protect the Democratic Party despite a lack of tangible results. They suggest that these figures fear being ostracized from their social and economic positions.