Topic: Law

42 chapters across the catalog

100: Hard R
• 1:56:12 - 2:01:50

100: Hard R

Teacher Suspended for Using Slang in Classroom

A Kentucky teacher, Bennett Dawson, was suspended after using a version of the N-word while telling a student to sit down. Dawson argued he was using the "slang" version ending in 'a' to build rapport with students, rather than the "hard R" slur. The hosts discuss the confusion caused by these linguistic variations and the risks of non-black individuals attempting to use black vernacular.

95: IDK
• 2:10 - 4:14

95: IDK

Robert Greene, The 33 Strategies of War Book Overview

The discussion centers on Robert Greene's 2006 book, The 33 Strategies of War. Mo describes the 27-hour audiobook and a condensed video version that outlines strategic principles derived from historical military leaders. The hosts plan to apply these strategies to modern psychological warfare and current global events, noting Greene's previous success with The 48 Laws of Power.

91: Scott Free
• 1:04:56 - 1:07:40

91: Scott Free

Rasmussen Reports Poll Data Analysis

A breakdown of the actual Rasmussen poll numbers reveals that 72% of American adults agree with the statement "It's okay to be white." The hosts highlight the discrepancy between the poll results and the media narrative. They also critique the Southern Poverty Law Center for labeling the phrase as hate speech, which influenced the public's refusal to answer the survey.

89: Mass Confusion
• 36:39 - 40:06

89: Mass Confusion

Private Law and the Rescinding of Privileges

The word "privilege" is broken down into its Latin roots, *privus* and *lex*, meaning "private law." The hosts discuss how privileges are granted for good behavior and rescinded for bad behavior, using the Hasidic Jewish community's experience with vaccine mandates as a case study. They argue that modern identity "badges" (race, gender, orientation) are used to protect the loudest voices for the system.

89: Mass Confusion
• 40:06 - 44:47

89: Mass Confusion

Distinction Between Supremacy and Privilege

The hosts attempt to clarify the confusing overlap between "supremacy" and "privilege." They argue that supremacy involves inherent rights, while privilege is something granted by a higher power. They use the Second Amendment as an example, stating that the right to self-defense is God-given, whereas the government attempts to rebrand it as a privilege they can regulate.

89: Mass Confusion
• 53:25 - 59:04

89: Mass Confusion

Jordan Maxwell on Maritime Law and Corporations

Jordan Maxwell's theories on the "law of the high seas" are used to explain how commercial systems govern human bodies as corporations. The hosts discuss how birth certificates and social security numbers turn individuals into business entities subject to government regulation. This systemic control extends to homeschooling, where parents must seek state permission to educate their own children.

89: Mass Confusion
• 59:04 - 1:03:22

89: Mass Confusion

Control of Information and the Digital Ocean

The concept of maritime law is applied to the "digital ocean" of the internet. The hosts argue that whoever controls the flow of information, currency, and goods controls the world. They criticize the "uniparty" in Washington for its unquestioning support of Ukraine and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, viewing the conflict as a means to maintain control over global logistics and finance.

89: Mass Confusion
• 1:15:59 - 1:18:54

89: Mass Confusion

Legal Systems and Maritime Terminology

The hosts connect the American legal system to maritime law through its terminology, such as "courts," "flooding the gates," and "bailing out." They question the role of the Supreme Court and the Department of Justice in maintaining this commercial legal structure. They argue that the system is designed to prevent individuals from speaking for themselves, requiring "elite" advocates like barristers.

89: Mass Confusion
• 1:23:50 - 1:26:38

89: Mass Confusion

Marriage Licenses and the Salt Covenant

The hosts discuss the religious and legal nature of marriage, noting that the government treats it as a "corporate merger" through the requirement of a license. One host describes performing a "salt covenant" at his wedding as a permanent, non-governmental bond. They argue that the Bill of Rights was intended to restrict the government, not grant permissions to citizens.

84: More or Less
• 7:19 - 11:29

84: More or Less

Analysis of Justice Alito's Draft Opinion and the Politico Leak

The leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion via Politico is analyzed, focusing on his argument that the Constitution makes no reference to abortion. The hosts discuss the lack of political resistance to the Texas "heartbeat law" as a precursor to the national ruling. They suggest the media used distractions like the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial to mask the inevitable overturning of Roe v. Wade following Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation.

84: More or Less
• 16:30 - 22:23

84: More or Less

Hillary Clinton's Criticism of Clarence Thomas and State Political Borders

Hillary Clinton’s comments describing Clarence Thomas as a "person of grievance" are examined, with the hosts characterizing her remarks as racially charged. The conversation explores the idea that overturning Roe v. Wade allows red states to build "political borders" to discourage migration from liberal states. A tangent regarding unusual Texas laws, such as restrictions on the number of personal adult devices, is used to illustrate state-level legislative control.

84: More or Less
• 22:25 - 28:37

84: More or Less

Racial Dynamics in Academia and the Supreme Court as a Referee

The hosts discuss the use of black female professors in media to criticize Clarence Thomas, framing it as a racial undertaking. They argue that the Supreme Court should function as an unbiased referee between the executive and legislative branches. The integrity of the court is compared to sports officiating, where public intimidation of the "referee" ruins the game's legitimacy.

84: More or Less
• 38:03 - 45:12

84: More or Less

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legal Critique of the Roe v. Wade Decision

Archival audio features Ruth Bader Ginsburg explaining that she did not 100% support the Roe v. Wade decision because of its legal reasoning. She argued that the court should have struck down specific extreme laws rather than making all restrictions illegal in "one fell swoop." The hosts highlight her perspective that the ruling operated outside the court's traditional incremental process, effectively acting as a constitutional amendment.

83: Sources and Methods
• 1:06:09 - 1:10:51

83: Sources and Methods

Global Systems of Abuse and the "Instant Boulet" Moment

The discussion touches on global systems of child abuse, referencing the Catholic Church and the Dutch Justice Department. An "Instant Boulet" moment is identified when a speaker at a press conference abruptly shifts from criticizing politicians to praising law enforcement partners like the FBI and DEA. This sudden reversal is framed as evidence of the "cult-like" nature of political and institutional loyalty.

79: Pizza Party
• 1:11:55 - 1:17:09

79: Pizza Party

Ted Cruz on Sex Offender Statutes and Harvard Law Review

Senator Ted Cruz questioned Jackson on her Harvard Law Review note, where she argued that certain sex offender registration laws could be viewed as unconstitutional punitive measures. One host shares a personal history of investigating elite pedophilia in the Netherlands and Belgium, including the Dutroux case. They discuss the trauma-based origins of many offenders and the distinction between medical treatment and occult-related power abuse among elites.

78: Hiding in the Fuzz
• 2:07:53 - 2:12:56

78: Hiding in the Fuzz

Heritage Foundation and the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund

Jason Johnson of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund discusses a report on "prosecutorial malpractice" in six cities with progressive DAs. The hosts point out that the Heritage Foundation is also a donor-funded organization, suggesting that both sides of the political aisle are looking for their own "billionaire daddy" to fund their agendas. They predict the next phase of policing will involve surveillance algorithms rather than more officers on the street.

77: No Hugs Needed
• 29:44 - 33:59

77: No Hugs Needed

Joe Biden Legislative History and Black Community Impact

Charlamagne tha God asserts that Joe Biden has caused more harm to Black people than Donald Trump, citing the 1988 crack laws and the 1994 Crime Bill. The discussion highlights Biden's past collaboration with segregationist Strom Thurmond. Despite these criticisms, the hosts note the cognitive dissonance of public figures who continue to advocate for voting Democrat.

74: Silly Mode
• 0:11 - 10:33

74: Silly Mode

Mo Facts Fired for Non-Compliance with Corporate Vaccine Mandates

Mo Facts announces his termination after 15 years of service following his refusal to comply with a corporate vaccine mandate. He describes the timing of his firing as evidence of collusion between the United States government and corporations, noting his dismissal occurred just before OSHA mandates were dropped. Mo declares his transition to full-time independent media production and entrepreneurship, emphasizing the importance of listener support for non-corporate voices.

74: Silly Mode
• 46:52 - 55:50

74: Silly Mode

The Bloody Code and the History of Hanging in England

A historical overview of capital punishment in England describes the "Bloody Code," where over 220 crimes—including stealing a rabbit or blackening one's face at night—were punishable by death. The segment details how children as young as eleven were sent to the gallows to maintain social order. This English tradition of "perfecting" execution is identified as the precursor to the American mindset regarding law and order.

73: Justice 4 Juicy
• 2:21:26 - 2:29:53

73: Justice 4 Juicy

Time's Up Legal Defense Fund and Corporate Funding

Tina Tchen appeared on CBS This Morning to discuss her new role at Time's Up and the success of its Legal Defense Fund, which raised $21 million in 100 days. The hosts question the transparency of the fund, noting it is housed within the National Women's Law Center and receives significant corporate donations, including $20 million from CBS.