Topic: Debate

9 chapters across the catalog

100: Hard R
• 22:48 - 26:19

100: Hard R

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris Debate Performance

The 2024 presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris is analyzed through the lens of "trolling" and emotional triggers. Harris successfully provoked Trump by mentioning his rally crowd sizes, while Trump managed to ignore other baits regarding the military. The hosts also discuss the Democratic strategy of labeling Trump and JD Vance as "weird," describing it as a modern attempt at a linguistic spell.

76: Third Rail
• 3:43:06 - 3:58:07

76: Third Rail

Transactional Solutions for Media Representation

The discussion focuses on how to handle media offenses through a transactional lens rather than an emotional one. Mo Facts suggests that instead of demanding an apology, activists should have leveraged the moment to get better representation of ADOS (American Descendants of Slavery) voices on Rogan's massive platform to counter negative stereotypes.

73: Justice 4 Juicy
• 2:33:34 - 2:41:33

73: Justice 4 Juicy

The Great Debaters and Communist Ties to Civil Rights

The film The Great Debaters, starring Jurnee Smollett and Denzel Washington, is used to illustrate the historical link between the Communist Party and early civil rights organizing in the South. The hosts discuss how the Communist-led Sharecroppers Union in the 1930s provided a blueprint for later movements, a history often suppressed in mainstream narratives.

59: Restoring Justice
• 1:08:19 - 1:13:06

59: Restoring Justice

Fox News Debate and the Dehumanization of Black Conservatives

A heated exchange on Fox News between Horace Cooper and Scotty Smart is analyzed, where Smart refers to Cooper as a "token." The hosts criticize this as a dehumanizing tactic used to nullify Black individuals who do not adhere to liberal narratives. They argue that the 2020 election saw a significant number of Black men seeking to speak for themselves, only to be silenced or dismissed by the mainstream media.

46: Kamala Kanye King
• 2:23:08 - 2:30:30

46: Kamala Kanye King

Democratic Strategy and the 2012 Election Mirror

The hosts compare the 2020 election to 2012, suggesting that Trump is successfully using the "moral card" via Kanye West to reach Black voters. They speculate that Kamala Harris was selected to secure funding from donors like George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The segment ends with skepticism about whether Joe Biden will actually participate in a live debate against Trump.

46: Kamala Kanye King
• 3:06:37 - 3:10:12

46: Kamala Kanye King

Donny Deutsch and the Gender War Narrative

Donny Deutsch describes the 2016 election as a "gender war," claiming that Donald Trump's behavior during debates galvanized women to revolt. The hosts discuss whether the "Karen" phenomenon is a byproduct of this gender war rather than a purely racial one. They suggest that people often identify more strongly with their gender than their race when feeling threatened.

27: Lift-Gate
• 11:03 - 13:05

27: Lift-Gate

Donald Trump Nicknames and Michael Bloomberg Debate Performance

Donald Trump utilizes derogatory nicknames like "Minnie Mike" and "No Boxes" to attack Michael Bloomberg's physical stature and debate performance. Trump highlights Bloomberg's $500 million campaign expenditure in relation to his relatively low polling numbers compared to Bernie Sanders. The hosts observe that the 2020 election has devolved into billionaires trading insults via social media.

18: Shero to Zero
• 1:24:14 - 1:26:59

18: Shero to Zero

Washington Post on the Lack of Diversity in Debates

Chelsea Janes of the Washington Post discusses the upcoming Democratic debate, which featured an all-white lineup following Harris's exit. The segment explains that DNC debate requirements are based on polling and fundraising, effectively cutting out candidates who lack corporate or grassroots financial backing.

01: Black Bots
• 9:25 - 12:17

01: Black Bots

Marianne Williamson on Reparations at the Democratic Debate

During the July 2019 Democratic primary debate, candidate Marianne Williamson argued that reparations are a debt owed rather than financial assistance. Williamson proposed a payment of $200 to $500 billion, citing the unfulfilled promise of 40 acres and a mule for the four to five million slaves freed after the Civil War. She corrected moderator Don Lemon on the terminology, insisting that anything less than $100 billion would be an insult to the descendants of slaves.