Topic: Misinformation

9 chapters across the catalog

91: Scott Free
• 47:06 - 51:16

91: Scott Free

Definitions of Disinformation, Misinformation, and Malinformation

The hosts review the technical definitions of information disorder as categorized by the organization First Draft. They debate whether Scott Adams' actions constitute disinformation (intentionally false), misinformation (unintentionally false), or malinformation (true information used to cause harm). The conclusion reached is that Adams' behavior is best described as pure manipulation to prove a point about free speech.

89: Mass Confusion
• 31:51 - 34:37

89: Mass Confusion

Justice as the Counter to White Supremacy

Justice is defined as the uniform application of rules and norms, serving as the only true counter to white supremacy. The hosts criticize the double standards applied to medical professionals, noting that Anthony Fauci can change his stance without consequence while other doctors lose their licenses. They specifically mention a California law that penalizes doctors for deviating from approved COVID-19 medical advice.

82: High Value Target
• 1:43:43 - 1:47:58

82: High Value Target

Information Disorder: Dis, Mis, and Malinformation

The podcast examines the definitions of "information disorder" as categorized by the organization First Draft: disinformation (intentionally false), misinformation (unintentionally false), and malinformation (true information used to cause harm). The hosts argue that the term "malinformation" is particularly dangerous as it allows for the censorship of factual data if it is deemed "hurtful." This framework is seen as a tool to target the Manosphere and other dissident voices.

73: Justice 4 Juicy
• 50:12 - 55:27

73: Justice 4 Juicy

Mass Formation Theory and Information Vetting

The hosts discuss the concept of "mass formation" and how false information is often planted within real analysis to discredit researchers. They emphasize the importance of vetting clips and information, noting that independent media must be more rigorous than mainstream outlets that often rely on out-of-context soundbites.

61: Mark My Words
• 42:57 - 45:54

61: Mark My Words

TikTok Karen and the Stanford Internet Observatory

Rene DeResta of the Stanford Internet Observatory discusses the "harassment campaigns" faced by doctors like Nicole Baldwin when they post pro-vaccine content. The hosts label Baldwin a "TikTok Karen" for playing the victim after receiving public pushback on a public platform. They criticize the role of social media companies and Congress in defining "misinformation" to silence dissenting voices.

53: 2020 Vision
• 1:05:47 - 1:09:18

53: 2020 Vision

Tactical Misinformation Campaigns and Celebrity Antidotes

MSNBC's Nicole Wallace describes LeBron James' efforts as "tactical" compared to the "noise" made by Ice Cube and 50 Cent. The hosts argue that the establishment is attempting to use James as an "antidote" to independent-thinking Black celebrities who have questioned the Democratic platform.

53: 2020 Vision
• 1:51:29 - 1:56:36

53: 2020 Vision

Independent Media and the "Proof in the Potato Salad"

The hosts praise independent voices like Boyce Watkins for challenging the mainstream narrative on YouTube. They discuss the "proof in the potato salad"—the lack of economic progress in urban centers—and how this reality makes it difficult for Democrats to sell the same platform to Black voters after 12 years of stagnation.

32: Nocebo
• 24:14 - 27:47

32: Nocebo

Corona Beer Association and the Pearl Harbor Meme

A news report highlights a spike in Google searches linking the coronavirus to Corona beer, illustrating the prevalence of public misinformation. The hosts discuss how word association and lack of research lead to irrational consumer behavior, such as the halting of beer production. They also critique the emergence of the "Pearl Harbor" meme used by officials to describe the pandemic's peak week, characterizing it as a manipulative psychological tactic.