Topic: 9 11

Adam Curry and Mo Facts open the 100th and final episode of their five-year podcast series from the Texas Hill Country. The hosts reflect on their history, noting they first connected via Twitter DM regarding the term "ADOS" (African Descendants of Slavery) five years prior. Mo Facts introduces the final topic as the "N-word," describing it as the ultimate rabbit hole that has remained unspoken throughout the previous 99 episodes.

Details emerge regarding Shahed Hussein, an FBI informant on the lamb from fraud charges who was tasked with recruiting "terrorists" in Newburgh, New York. Hussein targeted a destitute community with 30% unemployment, offering massive financial incentives to individuals who had no prior history of radicalism. The hosts reflect on the post-9/11 era where questioning such government tactics was branded as unpatriotic.

A former FBI executive describes the post-9/11 bureau culture as one where "the rules don't apply anymore" in the pursuit of preventing another attack. The hosts discuss a 2009 Time Magazine article claiming that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller had his own office inside the Facebook building. They argue that the internet has become a tool for government propaganda rather than a bastion of free speech.

The hosts discuss the historical claim that the CIA coined the term "conspiracy theory" to discredit skeptics of the JFK assassination. They warn against the "overdose of truth" (OD), where inundating people with too much counter-narrative information causes their brains to shut down and retreat to the safety of mainstream media. They reflect on how 9/11 and the "fake news" era have permanently damaged public trust in traditional journalism.

The discussion shifts to the constitutional process of the Electoral College and the official certification date of December 14. One host describes a "9/11 feeling" regarding the election results, where the official narrative contradicts what is being observed. They argue that the American public lacks a fundamental understanding of civics, leading to confusion over how presidents are actually elected.

Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney discusses her 2002 loss in Georgia, which she attributes to the introduction of Diebold electronic voting machines. McKinney, a six-term incumbent, was defeated after questioning the 9/11 narrative and the role of intelligence agencies. The hosts note that Diebold machines lacked paper backups, allowing for "vote flipping" without an audit trail.

The controversy surrounding Reverend Jeremiah Wright's sermons is revisited. While the media focused on the "God Damn America" soundbite, the full context of the sermon addressed the historical mistreatment of Native Americans, Japanese Americans, and African Americans. The hosts suggest Wright was an asset who became a liability once the footage went viral.

The discussion centers on the psychological impact of media coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic, comparing the current atmosphere to the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Reference is made to Reverend TD Jakes regarding the power of a changed mind. The hosts examine statements by Governor Gavin Newsom regarding martial law and Bill Gates' proposals for digital vaccination certificates, suggesting these events are shaping a new societal framework of surveillance and control.

General Wesley Clark’s revelation regarding a Pentagon memo post-9/11 is highlighted, detailing a plan to "take out" seven countries in five years. The list included Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. The discussion notes that many of these countries have since been destabilized, suggesting a long-term strategic roadmap for the global empire.

The HR 40 bill proposes a commission to study the implementation of reparations, which proponents view as payment for services rendered rather than financial assistance. While some comparisons are made to the multi-billion dollar 9-11 reparations bill, ADOS advocates suggest the actual debt for 250 years of slavery and subsequent domestic terrorism reaches into the trillions. The discussion centers on whether the government will ever move toward a concrete number for repayment.