6 chapters across the catalog
Reporter Jacob Engels claims that the 2018 Florida gubernatorial recount in Broward County served as a "primer" for the events of the 2020 presidential election. Engels asserts that he reported on Andrew Gillum's private life and ties to lobbyists long before the federal indictment. The discussion considers whether Gillum's legal troubles are an "inside job" intended to silence someone with knowledge of election irregularities.
The discussion shifts to the constitutional process of the Electoral College and the official certification date of December 14. One host describes a "9/11 feeling" regarding the election results, where the official narrative contradicts what is being observed. They argue that the American public lacks a fundamental understanding of civics, leading to confusion over how presidents are actually elected.
Continuing the Nashon Garrett story, the hosts examine how a mail-in ballot could be cast from an old address without the voter's knowledge. They criticize the lack of transparency in the counting process and the conflicting reports regarding audits and recounts in Arizona. The segment emphasizes the general uncertainty and "flux" surrounding the official results.
The hosts propose a theory that Stacey Abrams is being set up as a "fall guy" by the Democratic establishment. They compare her situation to Loretta Lynch and the Clinton tarmac meeting, suggesting that if widespread fraud is discovered in Georgia, the blame will be placed on Abrams's independent infrastructure. They note that the DNC and Wall Street donors originally preferred Kamala Harris over Abrams.
The hosts argue that if Democrats truly believe black voters are the most "oppressed" and "disenfranchised," they should welcome a full audit of every vote to ensure accuracy. They criticize the media for previously worrying about foreign hacking while now dismissing all concerns about voting machine integrity. They call for complete transparency in the Georgia recount process.
The case of Crystal Mason is discussed; she was sentenced to five years in prison for voting in 2016 while on supervised release for a federal tax crime. The hosts argue that once a debt to society is paid, all rights should be automatically reinstated. They contrast her harsh sentence with the light punishment given to celebrities in the college admissions scandal.
