8 chapters across the catalog
Adam Curry and Mo Facts return for episode 92 of the podcast after a brief hiatus. Mo Facts introduces the central theme of the episode, "Terror Alert Orange," which serves as a metaphor for a new minority class. He posits that a specific group of people is being demoted from "whiteness" to "orange," creating a new social separation.
Mo Facts introduces clips from Neely Fuller Jr. explaining how white supremacy strategically takes all sides of an argument to maintain power. The hosts apply this concept to the current political landscape, suggesting that "orange people" are being pushed into the "people of color" category by the establishment. They argue that Big Tech and intelligence agencies co-opt both sides of the conservative and liberal media to prevent true independence.
The hosts discuss the Democratic Party's perceived failure to replicate the Black voting model within the Hispanic community. They argue that the "people of color" label is losing its effectiveness as a unified political tool and that Hispanic men are increasingly resistant to the "everlasting guilt trip" often used in political messaging.
The term "people of color" is analyzed as a potential social dog whistle used by affluent individuals to distance themselves from the label "black." This terminology is compared to the South African apartheid-era caste system. Figures like Kamala Harris are mentioned as using the term to navigate diverse political identities.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is criticized for her response to questions about reparations, which the hosts characterize as a "word salad" that avoids a direct answer. They argue that she is attempting to "hijack" the reparations conversation by framing COVID-19 relief through a "lens of reparations" for both black and brown communities. The hosts contend that this dilutes the specific claim of the descendants of American slaves to include other groups who did not experience the same historical tragedy.
Sadhguru discusses the "technology of dominance," explaining how conquering forces strip people of their original names to destroy their cultural identity. He cites the renaming of Indian cities and the historical renaming of enslaved Africans as primary examples. The hosts critique the modern shift from "black" to "people of color," arguing that such vague terminology is a linguistic tool used to dilute specific group identities and maintain control.
The term "people of color" is criticized as a tool to lump non-white groups together into a manageable, less important ball. Radio host Russ Parr is highlighted for his use of a stereotypical Asian character named Mei Ling, which is presented as an example of hypocrisy regarding racial sensitivity in media. The discussion explores how terminology like "colored people" versus "people of color" is used to maintain specific political structures.
The term "people of color" (POC) is analyzed as a political designation rather than a biological one, originating from 1970s activism to foster solidarity among non-white groups. One host expresses a strong personal distaste for the phrase, arguing it is a linguistic rearrangement of the offensive term "colored people." The conversation references J. Edgar Hoover as an example of racial ambiguity and critiques the lumping of diverse ethnic identities into a single "non-white" box for political utility.
