Topic: Projection

The discussion incorporates Carl Jung's concept of the "shadow," arguing that those in power project their repressed darkness onto scapegoats like racial minorities or political enemies. This psychological projection is amplified by mass media to justify violence and control. The hosts suggest that the N-word serves as a vessel for everything the "master" class refuses to acknowledge in themselves.

The discussion turns to modern genetic technologies like CRISPR and mRNA, which the hosts link to the legacy of Madison Grant and Joseph Mengele. A clip of Bill Gates discusses using "reproductive health tools" to moderate population growth by 2050. Yuval Noah Harari is featured claiming that humans are now "hackable animals" and that the era of free will is over.

The hosts discuss the ethics of Steven Crowder surreptitiously recording a phone call with Jeremy Boring to expose the "wage slave" nature of the proposed contract. They compare these media deals to 360 deals in the music industry and venture capital structures used in early podcasting networks like Pod Show. The discussion highlights the tension between independent creators and large media organizations regarding ownership of intellectual property and documentaries.

Mofax critiques the corporate funding of mainstream podcasts, using a Macy's-sponsored show as an example of "mind-numbing mind control." Macy's partnership with the Trevor Project and its promotion of LGBTQ-owned brands during Pride Month is discussed in the context of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) scores. The hosts argue that corporations benefit from "retail therapy" sought by unhappy, single consumers.

A clip from a previous *No Agenda* episode details how welfare rules in the 1960s required men to leave the home for women to receive aid. Mo Facts warns that Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) will give the government ultimate control to reward or punish behavior. He recalls seeing men run out the back door of rent-controlled apartments when inspectors arrived to check for "able-bodied men."

The discussion shifts to the political motivations behind the sudden prominence of CRT, suggesting it replaced the "1619 Project" after that narrative faced significant pushback. The hosts critique Kimberly Crenshaw's direct call-outs of Senator Ted Cruz, labeling her a political operative rather than a pure academic. They argue that the academic definition of CRT is being used as a shield for broader social changes being pushed in K-12 schools.

The segment critiques the Black Male Voter Project's approach, which uses behavioral psychology and Maslow's hierarchy of needs to "change the psyche" of Black men regarding voting. The hosts argue that political consultants are out of touch, and that Donald Trump's "What do you have to lose?" pitch effectively reframed the choice for those who felt ignored by the Democratic establishment.

The discussion frames episode 50 as a chronological primer for new listeners, focusing on the American Descendants of Slavery (ADOS) narrative. The timeline begins in 1619 and moves toward the civil rights movement to explain the legal basis for reparations. The goal is to distinguish these claims from social welfare programs by examining the historical narrative of the ADOS lineage.

Historian Khalil Jibran Mohammed explains how "white gold" (sugar) and later cotton fueled the rise of American capitalism. The production of these crops created a competitive advantage for the U.S. and generated wealth for Northern banks through investments mortgaged on enslaved people. The hosts argue that the United States as a corporation owes a debt for these state-sanctioned practices, independent of individual white citizens.

Mondale Robinson introduces the Black Male Voter Project, which aims to create "super voters" among black men using behavioral psychology. The project utilizes a proprietary "BMEP Additory Approach" based on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs to change the psyche of black men regarding electoral participation. The hosts express skepticism, viewing the use of psychological frameworks as a form of "deep programming" or mind control.

Corey Brooks, executive director of Project Hood, argues against federal police intervention in Chicago, advocating instead for job creation and vocational training. He emphasizes that sustainable communities are built through employment rather than government assistance. The hosts critique the media's framing of these issues, specifically citing deceptive questioning by British outlets.

The hosts return to their Saturday recording cycle for episode 37, noting the short five-day gap since the previous release. They briefly discuss the weather in Texas before introducing the main subject of the day, the New York Times 1619 Project. One host explains his preference for letting major media narratives play out for a year before analyzing them to see the full story.

The 1619 Project is described as a multi-part New York Times presentation intended to reframe American history by placing slavery at the center of the national narrative. Media coverage from MSNBC's Morning Joe highlights the intense public demand for the physical magazine issue. The hosts identify "reframing" as the central theme of the project and question whether it serves as a political tool to "blackivate" voters ahead of the 2020 election.

Black conservative activist Robert Woodson launched the 1776 Project to counter what he termed the "anti-America propaganda" of the 1619 Project. Woodson argues the Times' endeavor defines America as incurably racist and promotes a victimization mentality. In response, Nicole Hannah-Jones defends the project as a patriotic tribute to Black Americans who fought to realize the country's founding ideals despite systemic oppression.

The hosts conclude the episode by emphasizing the importance of having accurate historical information heading into the 2020 election. They argue that as people become more educated, traditional propaganda becomes less effective. The show closes with a musical track about freedom, reinforcing the theme of mental liberation from media-driven narratives.

Sociologist Harry Edwards, a professor emeritus at Cal Berkeley, served as a mentor and advisor to Colin Kaepernick. Edwards has a long history of sports activism, having organized the 1968 Olympic protest involving John Carlos and Tommy Smith. Edwards describes his role as helping Kaepernick frame his movement and prepare for the personal and professional costs of his activism.

A series of clips and personal anecdotes illustrate the invasive nature of welfare enforcement, where state agents conducted night searches to ensure no able-bodied men were present in recipient homes. One speaker recalls being coached as a child to lie to white welfare officials about his father's presence. These policies positioned the state as the surrogate husband, displacing black men from their households.