11 chapters across the catalog
Malcolm Nance characterizes Trump voters as a "very large militia movement" and references the "Koreans on the roof" icon from the LA riots as a white supremacist symbol. The discussion covers the 2020 protests in Louisville and the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. The hosts argue that the term "Trump voter" is being codified by the Department of Homeland Security as a terrorist designation.
The donation segment continues with thanks to associate executive producers. A listener from Istanbul, Turkey, is acknowledged, leading to a brief discussion about the country's rebranding to "Türkiye." The hosts also clarify the gender of a regular donor named Kyle and acknowledge various "boob donations" and recurring monthly subscriptions via PayPal.
The discussion centers on the 2006 Duke Lacrosse case as a historical predecessor to the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. Similarities are drawn between the two cases regarding prosecutorial conduct, racial tensions, and the influence of the court of public opinion. The segment frames the Duke incident as an early manifestation of woke culture and academic activism within the university system.
Jalen Rose admits his past jealousy of Grant Hill's upbringing and "polished" image. The hosts argue that modern woke culture attacks sports because they are meritocracies that produce clear winners and losers, which conflicts with the goal of "equity." They link the Duke Lacrosse case to a broader ideological effort to dismantle patriarchal systems and traditional masculine discipline.
Adam Curry and Mo Facts introduce the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, framing it as a media psychological operation designed to incite fear and division. They discuss the abundance of opinions surrounding the case and the starkly different coverage provided by networks like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News depending on whether the prosecution or defense was presenting. The hosts argue that the trial highlights a justice system where outcomes are heavily influenced by the financial resources available for a legal defense.
The Kenosha District Attorney announces that no charges will be filed against the officers who shot Jacob Blake, leading to localized protests. The hosts suggest that the legal system and media pivoted their focus to Kyle Rittenhouse as a "consolation prize" for activists when the police shooting case proved legally indefensible. They frame the timing of these legal developments as a masking mechanism for other news.
An ABC News report provides a detailed timeline of the events on August 25, 2020, in Kenosha, involving Kyle Rittenhouse. The report covers the initial interaction at a car shop, the shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum, and the subsequent confrontation with Anthony Huber and Gage Grosskreutz. The hosts critique the report for its dramatic sound editing and for glossing over key details like the physical attacks on Rittenhouse before he fired.
The hosts deconstruct the media narrative that portrayed Kyle Rittenhouse as a white supremacist who traveled across state lines to hunt black protesters. They note that all three individuals shot were white, a fact that many people—including media figures like Anna Kasparian—only realized during the trial. They compare the media's treatment of Rittenhouse to figures like Dylan Roof and George Zimmerman to maximize public outrage.
Using summaries from Nate the Lawyer, the hosts highlight how the prosecution's own witnesses provided testimony that supported Rittenhouse's self-defense claim. Witness Gaige Grosskreutz admitted he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse before being shot, and others testified to Rosenbaum's death threats. The hosts also question why the FBI was flying drones over the scene and why that footage was not more transparently utilized.
The hosts analyze Kyle Rittenhouse's emotional testimony on the stand, debating whether his crying was genuine or a coached defense strategy. They discuss the "mass formation" effect where 30% of the population is hypnotized by the narrative and cannot be convinced by facts. They also critique the defense attorney's style and the polarizing reaction to Rittenhouse's display of emotion on social media.
The hosts discuss why fans haven't abandoned sports despite the mandates, citing the "communal aspect" of fantasy leagues and gambling. They suggest the leagues are picking "anti-hero" targets like Aaron Rodgers and Kyrie Irving to beat up on. They note that despite the controversy, jersey sales for these players often remain high, indicating a groundswell of public support.
