Topic: Tiananmen Square

Alex Jones critiques President Clinton's praise for "freedom" in China, citing the Tiananmen Square massacre and forced labor camps as evidence of the contrary. Jones argues that Clinton's rhetoric about "managed global growth" and "managed change" is doublespeak for moving away from free markets toward a command-and-control global economy.

The FBI's decision to move reporters two miles away from the Mount Carmel compound is compared to the Chinese government's actions before the Tiananmen Square massacre. Critics argue that the "safety" excuse was a pretext to remove witnesses to the impending assault. The segment highlights how governments use media exclusion to control the narrative and prevent the public from seeing the reality of state violence.

Madeline Albright and Bill Clinton are accused of hypocrisy for condemning human rights violations in China while the U.S. government has committed similar acts. The host cites the deaths at Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the case of tax protester Gordon Kahl as examples of domestic human rights abuses. He suggests the focus on China and Taiwan is a diversion to distract Americans from the enemy within Washington D.C. and New York City.

The Clinton administration is accused of hypocrisy for criticizing China's human rights record while overseeing domestic incidents like Waco and Ruby Ridge. The host argues that international conflicts in China, Taiwan, and Bosnia are diversions intended to distract Americans from the erosion of their rights at home. He cites the scrambling of communication lines in Bosnia as evidence of globalist censorship.

The hosts criticize President Clinton's planned visit to Tiananmen Square, arguing that the Monica Lewinsky scandal is a distraction from the transfer of nuclear missile guidance systems to the Chinese military.

A news report covers the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and President Clinton's decision to renew China's Most Favored Nation trade status. Exiled dissident Harry Wu criticizes the administration's policy of engagement as a form of appeasement.