Topic: Mehdi Hassan

4 chapters across the catalog

78: Hiding in the Fuzz
• 3:15 - 6:38

78: Hiding in the Fuzz

Right-Wing Perspectives on George Soros as a Political Boogeyman

Media clips featuring Mehdi Hassan and Emily Tamkin explore how the American right wing views George Soros as an existential threat. Critics attribute rising crime, migrant caravans, and the "defund the police" movement to Soros's institutional funding. The discussion highlights how Soros's public image has taken on mythical proportions, often being framed as a villainous character seeking to dismantle Western civilization.

78: Hiding in the Fuzz
• 56:36 - 59:28

78: Hiding in the Fuzz

Tucker Carlson and the Character Assassination of Soros

Mehdi Hassan criticizes Tucker Carlson for his "Hungary vs. Soros" special, accusing him of fueling "Great Replacement" theories. The segment mentions the 2018 mail bombing attempt by Cesar Sayoc as a consequence of this rhetoric. The hosts analyze how media figures like Hassan emphasize Soros's Jewish identity to frame all opposition to his policies as inherently bigoted.

68: Lizard Lounge
• 3:45 - 8:44

68: Lizard Lounge

Kimberly Crenshaw Defines Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality

Kimberly Crenshaw, executive director of the African American Policy Forum and a law professor at Columbia and UCLA, defines Critical Race Theory as the study of how law has historically sustained racial inequality. Appearing on MSNBC with Mehdi Hassan, she explains that the framework originated in law schools to examine the infrastructure from slavery to the present. The discussion also revisits Crenshaw's coining of the term "intersectionality" as a prism for understanding compounding forms of disadvantage.

68: Lizard Lounge
• 22:43 - 31:17

68: Lizard Lounge

Statistical Manipulation and The Economist Polling Data

Mehdi Hassan presents polling data from The Economist regarding American awareness and favorability of Critical Race Theory. The hosts deconstruct the presentation of these statistics, arguing that the "subset of a subset" delivery is designed to confuse listeners and make the narrative sound more official. They reference Matthias De Smet’s observation that during crises, even highly intelligent people will believe absurd numbers due to the impact of mass formation on cognitive functioning.