5 chapters across the catalog
Antonio Moore discusses the political strategy of the ADOS movement, emphasizing the need to vote "down ballot Democrat" to avoid being labeled as a right-wing propaganda tool. The hosts strongly disagree with this approach, arguing that herding voters back into the Democratic Party "sucks the air out of the movement." They view the insistence on party loyalty as a failure of the "litmus test" for true independent political power.
A New York Times article by Farah Stockman titled "We're Self-Interested: The Growing Identity Debate in Black America" is introduced as a potential tool for dissension. The discussion suggests the article's framing of the American Descendants of Slavery (ADOS) movement mirrors COINTELPRO tactics designed to cause internal group conflict.
The New York Times article is criticized for featuring Tariq Nasheed prominently while downplaying the actual founders of the ADOS movement, Yvette Carnell and Antonio Moore. This is viewed as a strategic move to associate the movement with a more controversial figure rather than its intellectual architects.
The hosts compare the debate over student loan forgiveness to reparations, labeling debt as a form of modern slavery. They critique Marianne Williamson for couching her reparations proposal in "politically feasible" terms while other candidates promise massive debt cancellation. Williamson's connection to ADOS advocate Antonio Moore is noted as a sign of her being better coached than her peers.
Affirmative action programs, originally intended for descendants of American slavery, have expanded to include women and immigrants of various backgrounds. This expansion has led to the overrepresentation of African and Caribbean immigrants in universities and professional spaces at the expense of the ADOS population. Critics argue that these programs no longer function as the repayment for slavery they were initially designed to be.
