The terminology used in the debate over reparations is analyzed, specifically contrasting the word "reparations" with "atonement." Citing Herschel Walker's testimony during HR 40 hearings, the argument is made that "atonement" implies a voluntary act by an offending party, whereas "reparations" is often perceived as forced retribution. Media framing by figures like Laura Ingraham is criticized for potentially alienating audiences through inflammatory editorializing.