29:14 Alright, here. Okay we're going to implement a new system here of bringing collars to the air and I appreciate you folks have been holding for awhile We've got a new system that were going with here Okay line one we got Paul. Paul are you with us? Hello slaves. Hi, Slade! Yes I was wondering in the interest of not being overtaxed wouldn't it be better if we did turn over the parks that way we wouldn't have to pay to maintain them? Oh yeah turn them over and you know what we paid the UN. Why don't just give him the parks I see no big deal with him taking them over Well let me ask you then who do you think financed them for free to begin with
29:52 Did we have to pay for the land? Hey, we're giving the Chinese our naval bases! I agree. Let's give them our military bases too! Shut up! No no no... Yeah yeah who do you think paid for it to preserve the national parks to begin with? Uh did we? The slaves! American taxpayers. It was promised to us if we payed the taxes one of the things that they'll that don't pay off the National Parks and Preserve this land for the slaves to go and have recreation right okay OK. Now, yes I have a problem after the slaves pay for it to turn it over to an unelected body called the United Nations that are totally unelected by us. They're a fist of international banks? Yes! I have a problem with them. So you don't want to give them the parts? No, I don't want to give an unelected body the parts
30:37 that I've fallen body sir what's the difference between giving the parks to the UN and just or letting this evil so-called government keep them if they're both as bad as you say okay let me answer that I want we give them to the new world order whatever at least we won't have to pay to maintain them or anything well first off, we do pay the U.N., in fact where did we pay? We pay dues right now for $2 billion a year but let me just ask a question To answer your question, specifically I don't believe that we should be forced through coercive measures. Listen to this guy! Let me answer the question! He's willing to give it up for foreign partners. Don't interrupt him. Yeah but he has a valid point. Now to answer your question specifically...I do not believe
31:19 that American people should have their house stolen away from by the IRS, uh...should have their cars seized and taken from them. People should be put in jail for refusing to pay taxes to pay for any part. But they won't take crap dealers off the streets? Whether it's under UN, American or what? Shut up! Go ahead Jeff I'm sorry No that-that's my answer. I agree with you. Okay. I don't believe we should have a coercive government that forces us through coercive means, meaning sending people in with men and with guns to enforce IRS taxes to pay for any parks. And rightfully so! If people want to have parks they can set up parks and pay for them voluntarily Right but see what I'm trying to say is that we need to realize that maybe parks were a bad investment We're not making money off of them and if someone's willing to take those off our hands then we no longer have to pay to maintain whatever... We're still paying for em? Let them have it
32:11 no let me make that the first point is we should not have been forced to pay for it period. at least on the surface, we were promised that if we participate coercively and pay these taxes. We would have these lands for our use in our recreation protected by the so-called US Congress and our national government Never was it told to us when they were stealing from us to pay for the National Parks That one day they would be turned over to an international body not elected by us So it's a fraud either way you look at
32:48 Yes. It's unconstitutional, but at least if it's under our U.S. Congress and at least on the premise that our congress is a legitimate congress that has our best interests at heart maybe they will protect the parks and let the slaves go and use that park Yeah Clinton shut down the parks already now Let me give you an example like say we got in like a bad car when making payments And then someone offered to just basically take over the payments when the car was already a piece of crap I mean, wouldn't that sound like a good deal? No but there's a fallacy in that thought and the fact is you volunteered to go pay for that car. I didn't volunteer to pay for this park! This park has been bought off the golf course. Well, the caller's missing it though Jeff. No you gotta understand... You're missing it! Is it hard to talk? I've been sitting here for five minutes. Well, you got to understand the basic premise. The premise is that- We're still paying for the parks Jeff Yes that too also we do pay a fund in United Nations. No, the United Nation isn't paying for these either they just get to run them because its for global goodness. I know but we still do pay a fee It's like paying your house payment and somebody dropping by an running your house Here my point How are they running them
33:51 They've got them under the UNESCO. Forget it, just forget it! I'm asking you a question how are they running them? They have U.N. troops there Through the U.N. charter they have now taken control of these national parks that at one time were promised to the American slaves So if they had U.N. troops as opposed to American troops there, did they used to have American troops in these parks No, no they used to have regular National Park Rangers Ok so we're not having to pay for park rangers anymore then that's not the point. We've already paid for it. We're paying for the UN, sir! See you have to understand the first premise is that this whole idea is a scam I understand but what I'm trying to say...
34:32 the premise that initially we should not lose our house to pay for any part. Right, and maybe if we didn't have to pay for the parks we wouldn't have to pay so many taxes because we'd live in our homes! No but one of the reasons why it was fed to us why were paying taxes... It is given to the bankers and they'll pay all their taxes! Let me answer the question The reason why it was fed to the public and sold to the public was that these parks, if you pay your taxes we would have these parks to enjoy for us. Never was it sold to us when they were selling this that it was going to be turned over to an international body not elected by us So its a scam on every front That's the point It is part of the hope...that's about the best I can answer Hello?
35:24 I guess we lost him. Alright, did you want to respond? John, you're on line too. Hello! Is this John? Hi John. How are ya doing? Good and you? If Hillary Clinton gets prosecuted can Bill Clinton give her a president pardon? I have no idea. To me that's part of the bread and circus issue, that I don't think really amounts to anything