Topic: Stephen Dunifer

3 chapters across the catalog

Jeff Davis(Classic 1998) 3 Hour Special W⧸ George Humphrey, Steve Lane, Rob Patterson [Pl9yC0kotOY]
1:26:27 - 1:30:05

Jeff Davis(Classic 1998) 3 Hour Special W⧸ George Humphrey, Steve Lane, Rob Patterson [Pl9yC0kotOY]

Keith Perry, North Austin Clandestine Radio Signal

The discussion focuses on Keith Perry, a micro-broadcaster operating a 90-watt station at 95.9 FM in North Austin. Perry uses a 70-foot tower and professional engineering to ensure his signal does not drift or interfere with other stations. The panel also references Stephen Dunifer of Free Radio Berkeley, who successfully challenged FCC injunctions in federal court on First Amendment grounds.

Jeff Davis(Classic 1998) 3 Hour Special W⧸ George Humphrey, Steve Lane, Rob Patterson [Pl9yC0kotOY]
1:34:42 - 1:39:05

Jeff Davis(Classic 1998) 3 Hour Special W⧸ George Humphrey, Steve Lane, Rob Patterson [Pl9yC0kotOY]

San Marcos KIND Radio, Supreme Court Free Speech Case

Jim Ellinger highlights KIND Radio in San Marcos, an unlicensed station run by activists who previously won a Supreme Court case regarding the distribution of the Hayes County Guardian. The station operates as a non-commercial community resource, featuring local officials and Congressman Ron Paul. The panel notes that the FCC's inability to stop the spread of these stations, fueled by Stephen Dunifer's transmitter kits, resembles a civil rights movement.

Jeff Davis(Classic 1998) 3 Hour Special W⧸ George Humphrey, Steve Lane, Rob Patterson [Pl9yC0kotOY]
1:48:18 - 1:52:35

Jeff Davis(Classic 1998) 3 Hour Special W⧸ George Humphrey, Steve Lane, Rob Patterson [Pl9yC0kotOY]

Radio Caroline, International Pirate Ships and Legal Stays

The panel discusses the history of offshore pirate radio, including Radio Caroline in England and Abbie Nathan's "Peace Ship" off the coast of Israel. They return to the legal battle of Stephen Dunifer, noting that Judge Claudia Wilkin in San Francisco refused to grant the FCC an injunction to shut him down. This legal "stay" is seen as a significant victory for the micro-broadcasting movement's First Amendment claims.