Sunday, 15 February 2026

Terry Liberty Parker(Classic 1996 Very Rare) Interview With Jeff Davis Alex Jones Terrorism [42AXBw9g0K0]

A rare 1996 broadcast captures the early friction between independent media and federal agencies as the domestic terrorism label begins to target political dissidents.

By Mike Hanson Archives | 27m listen | 12 chapters
Terry Liberty Parker(Classic 1996  Very Rare) Interview With Jeff Davis Alex Jones Terrorism [42AXBw9g0K0] cover

About this episode

Terry Liberty Parker and Jeff Davis confront the 1996 expansion of the domestic terrorism label, arguing that federal agencies are rebranding political dissidents to justify a burgeoning police state. The broadcast centers on a major retraction from Channel 24 News, which falsely linked an independent producer to out-of-state militia groups and the Republic of Texas. This incident serves as a catalyst for a broader indictment of state-sponsored intimidation tactics and the erosion of constitutional protections in the mid-nineties.

Specific reports of law enforcement harassment include an Austin woman being intercepted twice by police to be interrogated about her husband’s political affiliations without any traffic violation. The Clinton administration faces sharp criticism for proposing mandatory biometric data collection, including thumb scans and blood testing for driver's licenses, while the IRS and FBI are accused of prioritizing the surveillance of public access television hosts over missing Russian nuclear assets. Further claims suggest insurance conglomerates are collaborating with the government to centralize private consumer data, a partnership Davis and Parker define as a modern iteration of historical fascism.

Alex Jones joins the program to provide local public access schedules for Cable Channels 10 and 16, urging listeners to utilize the Liberty BBS computer system for uncensored information. The dialogue takes a sharp turn into the ethics of drug prohibition, with guests alleging CIA complicity in narcotics trafficking and advocating for individual bodily autonomy. The broadcast concludes with a call to action at the Hickory Street Bar and Grill, where libertarian organizers gather to discuss asset forfeiture and the perceived divorce between the American government and the Constitution.


CHAPTER 01 / 12 Discussion

Domestic Terrorism Labeling and Police State Expansion

The term domestic terrorism is being utilized by government agencies to justify the expansion of a police state and increased coordination between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Critics argue that this new classification replaces older labels like anti-government extremist to target political dissidents. The discussion highlights how these labels are used to facilitate intelligence gathering on citizens.

domestic terrorism· police state· alex jones· mike hanson· law enforcement

00:00 I love Mike Hanson Arcaus. He used to be anti-government extremist, right wing... There's actually Alex settle down. There's actually a new term in town the anti-government thing didn't go over too Well because the way the government's been behaving Anti-government describes away most people feel right, but now there's a new term in town It's called domestic terrorism now we're gonna when we get to these news clips you'll see it I'm just wondering where they're going to go from here is there going to be the

00:46 But most people, when you see a black helicopter fly by on the news... We used to shoot bottle rockets up at them but never mind. But the thing that we have to understand now here's now that I know we have to be serious now Here's the thing domestic terrorism folks this is a new term in town Now i submit to you that yes there are domestic terrorists in this country. If it's not Jeff Davis, if it's not Alex Jones... Wait! Before you identify him... Not Terry Liberty Park Don't identify him yet we're going to have a little dramatic build up for that because this term domestic terrorism is being used to justify building the police state

01:27 matter of fact the news clip you're gonna show has uh... it was uh... channel twenty four are relying reporting on how the police apparatus at the state federal local level is learning how to communicate and all that kind of stuff and not i know but with dot they'll actually work uh... the the and the reason that they're having to do all this coordination is domestic terrorists like jeb davis yeah well let's take a look at the news clip and again it is 472-CALL call in and we'll take your calls here pretty soon

CHAPTER 02 / 12 Discussion

Channel 24 News Retractions Regarding Militia Affiliation

Channel 24 issued multiple retractions after unintentionally airing footage of an independent TV producer during a report on domestic terrorism and out-of-state militia groups. The station clarified that the producer, associated with the Jeff Davis show, has no affiliation with militia groups or the Republic of Texas. Despite the apology, the subjects argue the initial broadcast served to unfairly label independent media creators as dangerous extremists.

channel 24· jeff davis· militia· republic of texas· news retraction

02:08 And let's go with the three little news clips we have and then I'll define, all of us here. The news story, the retraction and the retraction...and I feel that these retractions are even more attacks that they will be dangerous, that they have a different political philosophy. It says that law enforcement in the state of Texas or in the United States is not legal and they cannot be legally stopped. Durham is a member of a national task force on domestic terrorism A crime no longer limited to the federal level Now all officers face the challenge it can happen during routine traffic stops When I see that paper tag or front tag

02:48 on the vehicle or they go in and see a militia sticker, they must exercise all caution in approaching those vehicles. Texas has just recently set up an intelligence gathering system which collects info on possible acts of domestic terrorism that information is then shared with all law enforcement agencies experts say militiamovements are usually led by charismatic leaders Militia members make use of the internet and other public access to argue their case, and to gather support. Often that support comes from other out-of-state militia groups. Despite the end of the siege, arrest, and recent conviction of Richard McLaren, Republican Texas members are still active. We blacked out a picture of the producers they showed a picture of... And there's been a lot of news stories about how it was unsolicited. The important point is we'll get into this later is the day after this

03:41 this story saying we gotta watch out for these people. They're dangerous Mike, Jess Perdue's wife was pulled over she wasn't given a ticket because her car was all in order and asked about where she worked or her husband worked if they had family and law enforcement yes they do uh... they were asked about firearms they were asked about militias they were intimidated like nazis would intimidate jews on the side of the- where she has to show her papers uh... much and i've ever liked his inspection sticker at the end of your involvement in order to have a quiet that so now uh... mike you're producer on your show ran up to the station again what for instance you better do retraction because you just labeled us as the kind of domestic terrorist but the government is now cranking out

04:25 to be the police in order to secure protect us from that basically slap the violent label on a bike and we've discussed this before it's a very good piece actually bother me so much like what we we said it was probably the sloppy journalism wasn't at the level of the yeah okay but that doesn't look but the point is visit to make just a story in its guest what does this what is this thing about collecting information i don't understand what that may you get one term let's see let's see the retraction Yeah. Roll that sucker! Here we go guys... ...how law enforcement is dealing with domestic terrorism In the story, we unintentionally showed video of an independent TV producer while he talked about out-of-state militia groups This producer tells us he is not affiliated with any militia groups and we regret any confusion this may have caused Now that retraction does nothing... We can just go to the second one Gary To what they show in the photographs? Yeah here's the second retraction

05:24 If we could just go to the second one here. I don't know if they're set up for that, but basically... Yeah he is, he's all ready to go with it This was the one that was done the next day before The incident took place uh..that Alex was talking about 432 call We ran a story in our 6 o'clock newscast yesterday. The story showed how law enforcement is dealing with domestic terrorism In that story we unintentionally showed video of producer with the Jeff Davis show while we talked about out-of-state militia groups This producer is not affiliated with any militia groups or the Republic of Texas and we regret any confusion this may have caused

CHAPTER 03 / 12 Discussion

Law Enforcement Harassment and Nazi Germany Comparisons

A woman was reportedly pulled over twice by police within two miles of her home and questioned about her husband's work and militia involvement despite having no traffic violations. The incident is characterized as a form of domestic terrorism carried out by those operating under the color of law to intimidate ordinary citizens. Such tactics are compared to Nazi Germany, where state agents used routine stops to harass and gather intelligence on the population.

police harassment· civil liberties· nazi germany· traffic stops· intimidation

06:05 Keeping kids safer, that's exactly it. Keeping kids safe! You know that's always the next story everything for the children air is in the atmosphere because we're helping the children and government is helping the children Okay so before I want to make sure that I get my point and tell the story And 472-CALL let the phone ring will answer you on here This really all I've got say about it They now gone from anti government extremist they are not going a new phrase Terry It's now called domestic terrorist and that's going to be justification for violating a lot of the Constitution, setting up a lot of police state measures... Because it is an emergency. Let me just submit one thing to the viewers of this program We do have domestic terrorists right here in America! We're gonna identify them right here on this show It's people who go in and murder

06:55 eighty some people away go back fifteen at sixty the seven of jill went and shoot a thirteen-year-old kidnap back that ruby ridge i think we were uh... you know the loving our assets he's diseases over three hundred thousand houses for you got it taxes for children we do have domestic terrorist in this country Unfortunately, they've been improperly identified. It's not Jeff Davis or anybody sitting here We do have domestic terrorism going on right here. They have uniforms they have badges They operate under color of law and in the case of that TV producers what? That TV producer were just talking about his wife was stopped by one of these domestic terrorists love it was so effective in his terrorism that she Was too scared to even get his badge number. She was shaken I

07:43 She was shaking out in the rain because the ordinary person when they pulled her over twice, it was two miles from her home. They were waiting for...they knew that she had family and law enforcement. They knew that she...they knew her whole history where she worked. They were only asking to harass her and then they let her go followed or another mile closer to her house a mile from our home pulled her over the second time this is akin to Nazi Germany 472 call and lest anybody be uncertain about this You don't defend good law enforcement by protecting bad policy. And folks, when the ordinary citizen... and think about this yourself if you're stopped by a cop do you feel

08:23 secure reassured or in today's environment intimidated do you feel intimidated if that the case you feel intimidated guess what yours you're being subjected to domestic terrorism are let me look at this for a one-hour hero four seven two call well i can't hear it and now like that there somebody thereto that way maybe i don't understand something about what i want to make they admitted that they are now gathering they have an information use of the is the term information gathering system and i want to know in america where ideas and opinions are supposed to be express freely what that may well it means the government uh... see when you and i try to get information we don't have the uh... authority nor do would do we wanted intimidated somebody scare them with with possibility of put them in jail or physical coercion to extract a little bit but the government does have that uses that

CHAPTER 04 / 12 Discussion

Government Surveillance Priorities and Personal Privacy

Government agencies are accused of prioritizing the surveillance of independent media hosts over significant national security threats such as missing Russian nuclear weapons or Chinese espionage. While the IRS and other bureaus monitor private citizens, critics point out the absurdity of labeling individuals as domestic threats based on their access to FM radio or public access television.

surveillance· irs· national security· russian nuclear weapons· chinese espionage

09:19 to extract information and now they're sharing this information that they acquired coercively. They're not telemarketers calling you and asking you up, when the government does it they get the information or you go to jail And now they are going to be sharing this information state federal local why? For domestic terrorists who were supposed to be somebody other than them Well Jeff, Terry & Jeff The thing we are talking about here is the atmosphere that we are in We're now in an atmosphere where they're not worried about 120 nuclear weapons missing from Russia. They are not worried about Chinese spies under the behest of the president being let into our national security computers, they are not concerned with IRS violating people. They are concerned with Jeff Davis and others having access to TV shows, FM radio shows

10:07 It's very... that's who they're worried about. You know, Jeff doesn't even own a firearm! He has two chihuahuas, a lovely wife and two children And I heard you may have a butter knife or two and you may even have a carving knife for turkey For cutting meat Yeah So subverted in control I think this domestic terror term is probably the most blighted of any Next it'll be blood-drinking Satan worshipper 472 call Alright we're gonna try to roll through these tests then We'll try to be quick on our responses here Yes caller Yes, hello? Yes. Uh yes I don't know what it is but i really seem to enjoy masturbating to your show. You're gonna do well in the police state! Alright now... That's what the public school has done. Public schools have done that he's gone. No kidding Saturday night and the guy is masturbating to our show Now you know I had to stop you guys from going out to bars and stuff to be here alright okay all right yes caller

CHAPTER 05 / 12 Discussion

Libertarian Principles and Diverse Political Seminars

The core principle of freedom is defined as the right to do anything as long as one does not initiate physical force against others or their property. Monthly seminars held at the Chariot are described as highly diverse events involving people of all races and backgrounds discussing government overreach. A caller's attempt to compare modern issues to Civil War-era slavery is dismissed as government programming.

libertarianism· physical force· free seminars· diversity· civil war

11:06 You disconnected me, okay. I'm glad you got it back. I didn't do it! Alright, alright...I saw ya. Hey, I've got television. No, you saw my hand over here and I didn't do it. We're bad. Yeah, I just want to know the difference between the Civil War days when it was your choice to own a human being? The difference between that and what we're talking about? Sure! You got it! Did you hear the premise that I talked about at the beginning of this show here? No, I didn't. All right let me put it out there again You're free to do anything you want so long as you don't initiate or do a credible threat to initiate Physical force against the person or justly acquired possessions of another let me that's it you're free to do anything you want Let me say one thing real fast We have these open-to-the public free seminars last sunny every month in the chariot and you speak there And you have very good audience here see what we talk about

12:06 is freedom. Freedom to do what you wish to as long as it doesn't violate somebody else, just like Terry just said. They're African-Americans they're Hispanics they are Asians they are whites there old people young people there short haired crew cut military people their people with nose rings there are tapas dancers there. There's...they're not tapas when they're unfortunately but everybody is there! Everybody this is the most diverse crowd you could create domestic terrorist. I mean, these are very evil people and they're there talking about government systems being involved not being apathetic? Very dangerous! I think that you mentioned it earlier Terry when we talked to you that this government now has become so abusive and then its... So intrusive It's such a debt now to collect its uh..to pay for its operations

12:50 that's my point, the pro-choice people were evil they had slavery back then and now the pro choice people run roughshod over everybody else. The pro choice people? What are you talking about man? You're really on top of things I see you've been programmed by the government. Is that your issue? I watched what they do Well, Terry's pro-choice. I didn't do that. Yeah people are sick of you. Terry is pro choice! I don't know what you're talking about. Thank...uh thank you caller. You're all going to prison!

13:28 That was a domestic terrorist that was a domestic I missed one. Sorry, I'll get back Are you there uh... this is a good relationship all we can all i have a bad idea because but it's going to say some of you allows uh... one person or group of people to be external next year the bell may call for you one day they don't think that part of future yes thank god are you out by your area craig caller or are you actually gonna talk about the issue

CHAPTER 06 / 12 Discussion

Insurance Companies and Private Information Gathering

Insurance companies are identified as massive entities that control trillions of dollars and gather vast amounts of confidential personal data. While this information is technically provided voluntarily by consumers, the government increasingly extracts this data by force to share across state and federal levels. This collaboration between corporations and the state is described as a form of modern fascism.

insurance companies· data privacy· fascism· propaganda· information sharing

14:16 You know you forgot one entity that really has a lot of control over the information The loving universities? No, well that's the insurance companies. $12.2 trillion in 1996 just in life insurance and people would argue that most of that money is being paid out on claims Well we all know if we're onboard a ship, Lusitania or Titanic whichever you choose, the main It's not who is on board the ship, it's who sails the ship. It's the captain So yes they pirate and control this money and they always cycle it back into more fascism More control, more government control Well I'm not talking about the money, I am talking about information Oh its a very great gathering You got to understand that first off you have government licensed media Bureaus of propaganda Plus

15:14 of many of the huge corporations that buy advertising, it's kind of a little network between the government licensing and the corporation. It's meant to keep small people out of business but they tell you what they want you to hear and that is what is interesting about all this. Well I think the caller's point is that insurance companies have a lot of confidential information that they've been already started confidential though terry it's not complicated sell that information i don't know if you're a little bit of a problem with the color of the differences that you volunteered to give me information insurance company when the government gets information about you you didn't volunteer he sang now there are three between information that will take

15:53 but i think or he's going to be insurance companies now some of the biggest ones are unrecognizable from the government and that they both share it will make me made right at what point should be made a bet the government courses insurance companies falling in line ralph did not allowed operate so what started as a private entrepreneurial venture things like insurance company which should have been probably product enterprise and have no proper to get information from you and certainly should be able to protect that information. Now the government takes the position that it can extract by force any information that it decides it wants, and now its going to share at a state and federal local level? Why? Because there's domestic terrorists! But somehow thats not the government!

16:45 It's just to help us. It's always in our best interest. Terry, when I'm talking about the insurance companies and you talk about it they're not getting it through commission yes it's voluntary I mean when you sign up for automobile or health or life insurance there are specific questions that have to be answered and those answers are given somewhat inconfidentially whether to either an insurance agent for auto Doctor that that information is contained in your file for life Let me ask you did you happen to see the the news clips we ran earlier? Oh, yeah Okay. Did you do you happened if you know those little kids catch a little those little catchy phrases that they use? Oh like domestic terrorist or yeah for anybody leader Dangerous doesn't like big brother go out of state militia. You're out of state Yeah

CHAPTER 07 / 12 Discussion

Biometric Surveillance and Mandatory Medical Testing

Texas and other states have implemented thumb scanning for government identification since 1993 following executive orders. There are growing concerns regarding federal proposals by the Clinton administration to require urine and blood testing as a condition for obtaining a driver's license. These measures are viewed as severe invasions of privacy and the transformation of citizens into "puppets" of the state.

thumb scanning· biometric data· bill clinton· privacy invasion· driver's licenses

17:40 I want to ask the caller, and I want to ask both y'all a question. By the way callers if you don't get it said here there's gonna be a show are you still going to be on Bo Henry? Yep 10-1130 and which channel? 10 or 16 I'm not sure. Okay cable channel ten or sixteen it's also called he's doing it as a calling right I guess, I don't know. Paul Henry's show is called Semantics so if you don't get it in here... This is actually the wrong folder. And also, you guys both have shows so they can call you. Hey Alex, you don't have my father there, do ya?

18:21 Yes I do. I'm not like the government. No, but did you give it to them voluntarily? Let me ask the Colorado County Office what do you think about how they started thumb scanning in 93 and it was an executive order from 92 and now in late 98 supposedly if states with their highway funds are able start... Your removable thumb just for that reason. What about urine blood testing they're going to start that soon for everybody is that no invasion of privacy Well you talk about thumb scanning, or like when you go get your checks now if your not a member of the bank. I don't even mean that with a private interest, I'm not a bank! The government has been thumb scanning since 93 in Texas most states are doing it and now Clinton wants urine and blood testing to get a drivers license. Soon they'll want to stick their hand up our ass. They're already doing that. That's what makes the puppets the puppets

CHAPTER 08 / 12 Discussion

Evolution of Police Philosophy and Public Reaction

The philosophy of law enforcement is shifting from "serve and protect" to mindless enforcement, which critics describe as a hallmark of a fascist police state. Public reaction to these changes typically follows a pattern of initial denial, followed by a sense of being overwhelmed, and finally a resolve to fight back. The discussion emphasizes that while the system is becoming more intrusive, organized resistance can still turn the tide.

police department· fascist state· serve and protect· social psychology· law enforcement

19:08 I submit that we're in very dangerous times right now. What's your first name? He'd rather not know. I agree with you and it is funny because, I feel sorry for the producer's wife who was pulled over. their reason for pulling her over. The policeman said that she didn't come to a full stop at her address. Now wait a minute, in the course of investigating that she didn't come to a full stop he wanted to know where did her husband work? well you know that she part of a militia and this was the day after that news piece saying watch out these people are dangerous. Was it Austin Police Department who pulled her over or was it the sheriff? Yes, it was. And I will say there are people who try to be good cops they're being edged out by the thugs and bullies that will apply for these jobs when the definition of badge is no longer

20:08 to serve and protect, but to enforce the law mindlessly with no conscience of your own. There is a difference there are two types of law people one is consistent with the American spirit of freedom the other one is the representation of a fascist police state and they are deserving just ten years ago most police cars in most counties had protect and serve now it's blue line is government against the people and that's where i look at a record will put that off it's loving secretary agree with your europe correct definition of freedom unfortunately if people have woken up but me but that's been long gone we live in a socialist capitalist capitol state their socialism for the elite it's my socialism for everybody else much worse than that uh... color let me know some of the others which are going to go over there were not

21:00 thank everybody uh... i want to know what it is a rat but one of the that we want to look at a fight with things that are wrong and bad some other things that we can see uh... dot make them a state following naively the master's agenda of being so immobilized and paralyzed by fear. You know, the first reaction that most people have to being told about stuff like this is, ah! No! Can't be! Denial. Second reaction is oh my god it's true it's overwhelming there is nothing we can do about it no, we can work together and then the third reaction of course is I don't know what could be done but by golly I'm not going to take this territory without a fight well here's the thing though Terry. I think its proper to believe that we can win turn this thing around we are winning if you underestimate the enemy then you could fall into a trap

CHAPTER 09 / 12 Discussion

Independent Media Schedules and Community Resources

Local public access television schedules are provided for programs on Cable Channels 10 and 16, including shows hosted by Alex and Jeff. Listeners are encouraged to access the Liberty BBS computer system for information or attend informal libertarian discussions held Sunday evenings at the Hickory Street Bar and Grill. A free newsletter is also offered to those seeking information on upcoming seminars and news stories.

cable channel 10· liberty bbs· hickory street bar· public access· newsletters

21:54 uh... plus the enemy again the enemy can try to be pragmatic and make sure you know the bunch of lies in my that's why i have been used a little bit to deal with we could work in this system without totally revamp and and tear down the system and and get us back to representative democracy uh... before i got onto some more these colors again uh... the you guys are gonna be on the agenda eleven thirty ten eleven thirty tonight uh... tell ten or sixteen hundred sixteen is also calling when is your show alex tuesday night eight thirty two eleven And people can call in there too. Channel 10, Tuesday night 830 to 11. And people go call in on it. It's live and Jeff is... Monday channel ten seven eight eight thirty p.m.. Alright so basically people... Can I put out my comment line about any of this? Okay folks let me just quickly say

22:39 If you have any information, news stories... if you want a copy of our free newsletter 370-9558. That's also linked in with the seminars. So if they want any information on the seminars they can do that as well and of course uh... if you've got a computer in a modem liberty bbs has been operating for years uh... four six two seventeen seventy-six it's free force to seventeen seventy six user computer modem the call there uh... you get all kinds information about all kinds of things uh... erratic activity yet they're at the fact that i am down also if you actually want physical warm body face to look at

23:20 uh... every sunday evening at uh... patient eighth in congress hickory street bar grill uh... we have informal discussion down there that it's a little libertarian informal discussion but you don't have to be a libertarian i want to hear about that they could be safe to say that your bps is now part of that domestic terrorism information and yes caller quickly or well that's what i know what he said global on the air are you there you know i think that one that line was a bad idea of a better way to correct okay yes caller yeah or not legalization marijuana repeal all drug prohibition the government has no business

CHAPTER 10 / 12 Discussion

Drug Prohibition and CIA Involvement Claims

The debate over drug prohibition centers on the right of individuals to control their own bodies without government interference. Claims are made that federal agencies, including the CIA and FBI, are complicit in the trafficking of illegal drugs into the country. While some argue for absolute legalization, others suggest decriminalization is the necessary path to end the violence associated with modern prohibition.

drug prohibition· marijuana legalization· cia· fbi· decriminalization

24:02 telling you what you can do with your body. It's your body! It doesn't belong to the government! Hold on, hold on... They also have no business shipping it in and bringing it all in here I am for decriminalization not absolute legalization and its a fact that the CIA and FBI and BATF and the Drug Enforcement Agency they are all involved bringing these drugs in police officers, CIA agents have all told me this it's out of control eyes look what prohibition created in the twenties a creative giant alcohol prohibition uh... gangs fighting each other on the streets bottom line is before they tell us what we can put our bodies and you know that businesses right here to wrap up if you want jack the price of them that's that's what about all of me some more people yet

CHAPTER 11 / 12 Discussion

Constitutional Divorce and Historical Fascism

The current relationship between the government and the people is likened to a divorce, where the state has abandoned Constitutional ideals and responded with controlling behavior. Critics of the Constitution who call it an "old document" are reminded that the alternative being implemented is an even older form of "thug rule" and fascism dating back to Ancient Rome.

constitution· ancient rome· fascism· government overreach· political theory

24:43 alright thanks uh... and if they want to think that we got our half-shut me forty five forty five that would be a little i don't know how you're going to look like the government is acting like uh... like a jealous lover who's losing who's losing their lover uh... here's what happened government has divorced itself from the constitution and the ideals from which it sprung in the process guess what else got divorced? The people, from the government. The government is complaining that the people are like disaffected and losing their their identity with the government while the government continues to divorce itself from the constitution so what happens they've got a lot like that just like it insecure lover they start getting controlling in an effort to get the people back to ask what the people are doing very exactly what you do when you crack crack down on the domestic terror terry although the governments to carry out that you may just want to be carried away as he met us was a little ten second comment quickly

25:38 People will then counter the people that have been brainwashed by UT professors and people they will then counter that well You know, the Constitution's an old document. 220 plus years. I would counter to them... That's why I said the ideals had sprung from it. Hold on! I would counter this What we're following now is Rome or Babylon It's old fascism 2000 years ago It's thug rule So what we were following was a lot newer idea than what we are following Alright let me try it. Ah, lost my place. I'm glad too. Yeah. Oh really? You there? Quick I just want to tell you a little story about me and APD. I was making delivery... We've only got a few seconds, so do it fast! Well my car got searched because i had $200 in my pocket and the cop told me that's why they searched my car Did they seize your cash? That's going on now. Asset forfeiture seizure You're no longer innocent until proven guilty If you have money they will take it It's for the government They're loving it's for your... I'm sorry Yes call her quick! You are all going to prison

CHAPTER 12 / 12 Discussion

Asset Forfeiture and Final Program Announcements

A caller shares a story of being searched by the Austin Police Department because he was carrying $200 in cash, highlighting the rise of asset forfeiture where citizens are no longer treated as innocent until proven guilty. The program concludes with a recap of upcoming broadcast times on cable channel 10 and a final call to protect the Republic against the "New World Order."

asset forfeiture· police search· new world order· republic· public access

25:38 People will then counter the people that have been brainwashed by UT professors and people they will then counter that well You know, the Constitution's an old document. 220 plus years. I would counter to them... That's why I said the ideals had sprung from it. Hold on! I would counter this What we're following now is Rome or Babylon It's old fascism 2000 years ago It's thug rule So what we were following was a lot newer idea than what we are following Alright let me try it. Ah, lost my place. I'm glad too. Yeah. Oh really? You there? Quick I just want to tell you a little story about me and APD. I was making delivery... We've only got a few seconds, so do it fast! Well my car got searched because i had $200 in my pocket and the cop told me that's why they searched my car Did they seize your cash? That's going on now. Asset forfeiture seizure You're no longer innocent until proven guilty If you have money they will take it It's for the government They're loving it's for your... I'm sorry Yes call her quick! You are all going to prison

26:38 You probably are. YOU'RE ALL GONNA DIE! sometime alright so you guys are gonna be on both every show uh... semantics later on tonight eleven or ten o'clock to eleven thirty on cable channel ten or a four sixteen well i'm not sure my prayers uh... he'll got it he's not produce read right now the jury informal discussion group at hickory street bar grill eighth in congress uh... sunday evenings from about seven ish onward uh... people come and go different times it's an informal this but i want nice people quickly when is your when you're sure i want to show on yes uh... it is on tuesday night eight thirty two eleven and my show is monday night on channel ten seventy thirty p m dot like that they were there are a lot of the constitution in depth with the world or not don't if you know take control your life something else will throughout the year

27:35 God bless the Republic, get the new world order!